Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF) Application in Management of Periodontal Intrabony Defects (IPRF)

March 6, 2022 updated by: mahmoud eldestawy, Al-Azhar University

Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF Application in Management of Periodontal Intrabony Defects (Randomized Clinical Trial)

One of the main objectives of periodontal therapy is the regeneration of the tooth's supporting periodontal tissue to its original levels. The healing after non-surgical and conventional surgical methods is histologically characterized by a long junctional epithelium along the root surfaces. Therefore, reconstructive techniques are required. Although complete periodontal regeneration is unpredictable with any regenerative therapy currently used, so the objective of our trial is to get complete periodontal regeneration by using Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF) in Management of Periodontal Intrabony Defects.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

32

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Al Azhar University University
  • Phone Number: 0020222628346
  • Email: Azhar@azhar.eun.eg

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 20
        • Mah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • No systemic diseases which could influence the outcome of therapy.
  • Good compliance with plaque control instructions following initial therapy.
  • Teeth involved were all vital with no mobility.
  • Each subject contributed a single predominately 2 or 3-wall intrabony interproximal defect around premolar or molar teeth without furcation involvement
  • Selected intrabony defects (IBD) measured from the alveolar crest to the defect base in diagnostic periapical radiographs of ≥ 3 mm, the width of ≥ 3 mm at its most coronal part, with no cratering that involve both mesial and distal surfaces of adjacent teeth.
  • Selected probing depth (PD) ≥ 6 mm and clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥ 4 mm at the site of intraosseous defects four weeks following initial cause-related therapy.
  • Availability for the follow-up and maintenance program; 8) absence of periodontal treatment during the previous year.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnant females.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF)
The surgical treatment phase was initiated only if the subjects had a full-mouth dental plaque score of less than one and a test site plaque score of 0. Following mucoperiosteal flap reflection for one tooth on either side of the defect, all granulation tissue was removed from the defects by means of Gracey 7/8 metal curettes, and root surfaces were scaled and planed using hand and ultrasonic instruments, then the defect was filled with xenograft mixed with IPRF, Finally, the flap was replaced and closed with crossed horizontal and vertical internal mattress sutures.
The surgical treatment phase was initiated only if the subjects had a full-mouth dental plaque score of less than one and a test site plaque score of 0. Following mucoperiosteal flap reflection for one tooth on either side of the defect, all granulation tissue was removed from the defects by means of Gracey 7/8 metal curettes, and root surfaces were scaled and planed using hand and ultrasonic instruments, then the defect was filled with xenograft mixed with IPRF, Finally, the flap was replaced and closed with crossed horizontal and vertical internal mattress sutures.
Active Comparator: bone substitute
The surgical treatment phase was initiated only if the subjects had a full-mouth dental plaque score of less than one and a test site plaque score of 0. Following mucoperiosteal flap reflection for one tooth on either side of the defect, all granulation tissue was removed from the defects by means of Gracey 7/8 metal curettes, and root surfaces were scaled and planed using hand and ultrasonic instruments, bone graft substitute was heavily condensed into the intra bony defects. The flap was replaced and closed with crossed horizontal and vertical internal mattress sutures.
The surgical treatment phase was initiated only if the subjects had a full-mouth dental plaque score of less than one and a test site plaque score of 0. Following mucoperiosteal flap reflection for one tooth on either side of the defect, all granulation tissue was removed from the defects by means of Gracey 7/8 metal curettes, and root surfaces were scaled and planed using hand and ultrasonic instruments, bone graft substitute was heavily condensed into the intra bony defects. The flap was replaced and closed with crossed horizontal and vertical internal mattress sutures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in clinical attachment level
Time Frame: baseline, 3, and 6 months
change in clinical attachment level
baseline, 3, and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in interseptal bone width
Time Frame: baseline, 3, and 6 months
change in interseptal bone width
baseline, 3, and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: mahmoud eldestawy, associted profissor, Al Azhar Universty

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 25, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 748/2757

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sticky Bone

Clinical Trials on Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF)

Subscribe