ESTIMATION OF INCREASED SURGICAL DRAINAGE OUTPUT FOLLOWING THORACOLUMBAR SURGERY

January 29, 2026 updated by: AKİF BULUT

ESTIMATION OF INCREASED SURGICAL DRAINAGE OUTPUT FOLLOWING THORACOLUMBAR SURGERY: DRAINAGE VOLUME PREDICTION SCORE

In a study involving neurosurgeons worldwide, it was reported that most surgeons preferred the use of drains (186, 80.5%) and subfascial drains (169, 73.2%), with 52.87% of surgeons discontinuing drains based on time and 27.7% based on drainage volume (Cabrera et al. 2025). While the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol does not recommend routine wound drainage for short-segment lumbar fusion surgery (Evidence Level Moderate, Recommendation Strength), the timing of drainage termination is based on drainage output (if drainage is below 50 ml) or based on postoperative days (day 2) (Han et al., 2024; Smith et al., 2019). We believe that further studies are needed to determine which patient groups require drains preoperatively and how long drains should remain in place postoperatively. This study, which aims to predict the amount of drainage during the perioperative period, will attempt to predict both the selective use of drains and how long to wait before discontinuing drainage in patients with drains. Lumbar subcutaneous fat thickness, previously used as a predictor of surgical site infections, will be tested for the first time in our study to determine whether it is a predictor of drainage output.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

326

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study by Li et al. (2025) titled "Risk factors leading to increased postoperative drainage in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery" (group with excessive drainage output 60%, group with low drainage output 40%) was referenced in calculating the sample size. Using the G-power 3.1.9.7 program, a Z test (Logistic regression) was performed. Assuming a 5% type I error (α), a 95% confidence level (1-α), and 0.95 power (1-β), the total sample size for high drainage output was 325 (Odds ratio (OR): 2.25). To ensure an equal number of patients in each group, 326 patients will be included in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-80 participated in the study.
  • Patients who have undergone long segment spinal surgery (2 or more segments).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with developing dural rupture,
  • Patients under 18 or over 80 years of age,
  • Patients undergoing revision surgery,
  • Patients undergoing short segment spinal fusion,
  • Patients using drains other than standard-volume closed suction drainage,
  • Patients with missing data,
  • Patients experiencing mechanical problems with the drain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Increased total drainage
In the study, increased total drainage is defined as a total drainage amount of 317 ml or more at the end of the drainage termination day.
Decreased total drainage
Decreased total drainage is defined as a total drainage amount of less than 317 ml at the end of the drainage termination day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total drainage volume
Time Frame: 10 days
Total drainage volume until the drain is removed in patients with a thoracolumbar drain following surgery.
10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-24/04

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Drainage

Subscribe