Balancing Emotions and Electronics: A Pilot Intervention for Preschoolers (BEE)

March 16, 2026 updated by: Virginia Peisch, Boston Children's Hospital

Brief Tech-Parenting for Regulatory Screen Use in Young Children: A Pilot Study

This study is testing a brief, virtual therapy for caregivers of preschool children. The goal is to reduce use of screen time to regulate young children's emotions and boredom, i.e. "regulatory screen use" (RSU). We expect that RSU negatively impacts young children's ability to cope with emotions and boredom. Thus, reducing RSU should improve children's self-regulation. The intervention will include three, 60-minute group sessions with caregivers, and remote data collection at three time points (pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Project Aims / Hypotheses. This intervention study aims to refine and test a brief, caregiver delivered therapeutic program targeting the problematic use of screen time to regulate young children's emotions and boredom, i.e. "regulatory screen use" (RSU). RSU is a candidate mechanism for the negative impacts of screen time on children's mental health; therefore, this proposal addresses the growing public health concern related to pervasive digital media use. Our group has already developed an effective brief tech-parenting program for school-age children; the current study will expand this intervention to target RSU in young children.

Aim 1: Develop and test the acceptability and feasibility of a brief tech-parenting intervention targeting RSU (Brief-RSU) with caregivers of 30 children ages 30-54 months. Hypothesis 1: We expect that Brief-RSU will be highly acceptable and feasible, as evidenced by high retention rates and positive caregiver feedback.

Aim 2: Determine the efficacy of Brief-RSU on caregiver and child outcomes. We expect that Brief-RSU will increase adaptive caregiving (e.g., emotion coaching; reduction in RSU) from pre to post (Hypothesis 2a) and significantly improve child emotion and behavior regulation (Hypothesis 2b).

Background. Significant concern among scientists and the public has emerged over the last decade regarding the adverse effects of screen media activity on child development, including poor sleep, reduced educational achievement, greater behavior problems, inattention, and anxiety. Despite this widespread concern, clinical recommendations on child digital media management are currently lacking, primarily due to gaps in our knowledge base. Existing research predominantly relies on simplistic screen media measures, such as total screen time, that do not consider the context and function of screen media use. Altogether, there is an urgent need to expand what is known about the mechanisms by which digital media negatively impact child development in order to provide effective and evidence-based recommendations to caregivers, clinicians, and policymakers.

Regulatory screen use (RSU), which describes the use of screen media to calm or occupy children at home and in public, has already been shown to be highly prevalent and associate with poor child outcomes. For example, a longitudinal study of more than 400 preschoolers found that higher RSU at baseline predicted worse executive functioning in girls and more emotional reactivity in boys 6 months later. Further, a study of 200 preschool-age children found concurrent associations between RSU, empathy, and emotional control. We propose that RSU affects psychosocial development by depriving children of critical opportunities to practice self-regulation skills. The proposed study will be the first to test whether a brief, caregiver-focused intervention can reduce RSU, while also strengthening adaptive parenting and child emotional well-being.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Caregiver endorses regulatory screen use
  • Child age 30-54 months at enrollment
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intellectual disability or global developmental delay
  • Autism spectrum disorder
  • Child in the custody of DCF

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
3-session, virtual group therapy
Brief-RSU Intervention: The Brief-RSU intervention consists of three, 60-minute sessions, outlined in Table 1. Brief-RSU aims to reduce RSU while increasing adaptive caregiver tools. Treatment targets include: 1) psychoeducation, 2) scheduling screen time to consistent times, 3) "planning ahead" for times when RSU is likely to occur, and 4) teaching the RULER approach[9, 10] to strengthen caregiver socialization of child emotion regulation (replacement behavior).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Regulatory Screen Use (RSU)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1-month follow up (i.e., 1 month after the last workshop).
Caregiver reported frequency of using screen time and non-screen time strategies to regulate a child's emotions. For example, the caregiver is asked how frequently they use screens (e.g., iPad; smartphone) to help keep their child calm when they are expected to sit still (e.g., at a restaurant). Seven different situations/settings are assessed (e.g., sibling conflict; at church or doctor's office).
Baseline; 1-month follow up (i.e., 1 month after the last workshop).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child self-regulation (BRIEF-Preschool)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1-month follow up (i.e., 1 month after the last workshop).
Caregiver report on an age- and gender-normed questionnaire assessing child emotional and behavioral regulation.
Baseline; 1-month follow up (i.e., 1 month after the last workshop).
Parental Stress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline; 1-month follow up (i.e., 1 month after the last workshop).
Caregiver self-report of confidence and stress related to parenting. The caregiver is asked to select one option (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree) on questions related to their experience parenting. There is a total of 18 questions.
Baseline; 1-month follow up (i.e., 1 month after the last workshop).
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline; 1-month follow up (i.e., 1 month after the last workshop).
Caregiver self-report of general stress and well-being. The caregiver is asked to select one response option (0=never; 4=very often) that best describes their current level of perceived stress. There is a total of 10 questions.
Baseline; 1-month follow up (i.e., 1 month after the last workshop).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of Workshop
Time Frame: Immediately following the 3-session workshop.
After completion of the three workshops on RSU, participant will be asked to provide feedback on how helpful the workshop curriculum was and how much they learned (managing child screen time; regulating their child's emotions).
Immediately following the 3-session workshop.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 26, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P00052998

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Limited IPD will be shared upon reasonable request from the researcher.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Screen Media Use

Clinical Trials on Brief-RSU

Subscribe