- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07403851
Effect of Scanning Technology on the Accuracy of Digitally Customized Intraradicular Attachments
April 21, 2026 updated by: Afnan Gamal Mohamed Qamar, October 6 University
Effect of Scanning Technology on the Accuracy of Digitally Customized Intraradicular Attachments: A Cross Overstudy
This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of intra-radicular attachments fabricated by direct scanning using three different scanners in vivo.
The primary outcome will be the accuracy of the fabricated attachments, while secondary outcomes will includepatient-reported comfort during procedure of taking intraradicular attachment conventional impression and direct scanning.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
The fabrication of intra-radicular attachments is a critical step in restoring endodontically treated teeth.
The accuracy of these restorations directly impacts their clinical performance, including retention, marginal fit, and long-term success.
With advancements in digital dentistry, intraoral scanners (IOS) have become increasingly popular for direct scanning of intra-radicular preparations.
However, the accuracy of these scanners varies depending on their technology, software, and clinical conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Afnan GM Qamar
- Phone Number: 01158902700
- Email: afnan.gamal98@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18-65 years.
- Endodontically treated teeth requiring intra-radicular attachments.
- Adequate oral hygiene .
- Periodontally Compromised Teeth: When some teeth have reduced bone support but can still be maintained as overdenture abutments with proper treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severely Compromised Remaining Teeth: If the remaining teeth have poor prognosis due to extensive decay or severe periodontal disease.
- Severe Bone Loss Around Abutment Teeth: If the remaining teeth do not provide adequate support, they may fail early, leading to additional complications.
- Severe Malocclusion: Where occlusal discrepancies make overdenture placement difficult.
- Limited inter-arch Space: cann't accommodate the overdenture components. 5 . Poor Oral Hygiene: increase the risk of decay or periodontal issues in retained abutments.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group I
Indirect scanning by desktop scanner (for the conventional impression)
|
Scanning of intra-radicular impression by desktop scanner
|
|
Experimental: Group II
Intraoral scanning by Intraoral scanner A
|
Direct scanning of the intra-radicular canal by Intraoral scanner A
|
|
Experimental: Group III
Intraoral scanning by Intraoral scanner B
|
Direct scanning of the intra-radicular canal by Intraoral scanner B
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy
Time Frame: Immediately after scanning.
|
measure accuracy between the dimension of the prepared canal gained by intra-radicular impression and the dimension of the prepared canal directly by two different types of intraoral scanners
|
Immediately after scanning.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-reported comfort
Time Frame: Immediately after impression taking and scanning.
|
Patient-reported comfort (assessed via a Likert scale questionnaire) Scaled from 0-100 The highest score means excellent The lowest score means unsatisfactory
|
Immediately after impression taking and scanning.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 4, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
February 11, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 24, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2026
Last Verified
April 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Effect of Scanning Technology
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Scanning Devices
-
Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.UnknownCT Scanning PatientsKorea, Republic of
-
Singapore General HospitalSengkang General Hospital; Servo DynamicsCompletedAbdominal Ultrasound ScanningSingapore
-
Philips (China) Investment CO., LTDWest China Hospital; Ruijin Hospital; Shanghai Changzheng HospitalTerminated
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedContrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) ScanningUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingAccuracy of Different Scanning Techniques
-
Duke UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedHealthy | Brain Reactivity of Non-smokers Undergoing fMRI ScanningUnited States
-
Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College, LondonCompletedOrthodontics | Digital | Study Models | Intra-oral Scanning | Measurements | Three DimensionalUnited Kingdom
-
Yonsei UniversityRecruitingHealthy Volunteers | Wearable Devices | Biomechanics | Robotic Exoskeleton | Assistive DevicesSouth Korea
-
Benha UniversityCompletedWearable DevicesEgypt
Clinical Trials on 3 shape desktop scanner
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Technische Universität DresdenNot yet recruiting
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingPrediction of Tooth WearUnited States, Belgium, France, India, Israel
-
Stanford UniversityUnited States Department of Defense; Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University of MiamiRecruitingGlioma | Brain Tumor | Malignant Glioma | Primary Brain Tumor | Malignant Primary Brain TumorUnited States
-
University Hospital AugsburgRecruitingNeoplasms | Neoplasm Metastasis | Metastatic CancerGermany
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationNot yet recruitingStroke | Anosognosia | Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy | Central and Peripheral Neurodegenerative Pathologies | Neuropsychiatric Conditions
-
AHS Cancer Control AlbertaCompleted
-
Legacy Health SystemTotal ContactCompleted
-
Duke UniversityCompletedIntracranial Hypertension | Cerebrovascular AccidentUnited States