Effect of Scanning Technology on the Accuracy of Digitally Customized Intraradicular Attachments

April 21, 2026 updated by: Afnan Gamal Mohamed Qamar, October 6 University

Effect of Scanning Technology on the Accuracy of Digitally Customized Intraradicular Attachments: A Cross Overstudy

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of intra-radicular attachments fabricated by direct scanning using three different scanners in vivo. The primary outcome will be the accuracy of the fabricated attachments, while secondary outcomes will includepatient-reported comfort during procedure of taking intraradicular attachment conventional impression and direct scanning.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The fabrication of intra-radicular attachments is a critical step in restoring endodontically treated teeth. The accuracy of these restorations directly impacts their clinical performance, including retention, marginal fit, and long-term success. With advancements in digital dentistry, intraoral scanners (IOS) have become increasingly popular for direct scanning of intra-radicular preparations. However, the accuracy of these scanners varies depending on their technology, software, and clinical conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 18-65 years.
  2. Endodontically treated teeth requiring intra-radicular attachments.
  3. Adequate oral hygiene .
  4. Periodontally Compromised Teeth: When some teeth have reduced bone support but can still be maintained as overdenture abutments with proper treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severely Compromised Remaining Teeth: If the remaining teeth have poor prognosis due to extensive decay or severe periodontal disease.
  2. Severe Bone Loss Around Abutment Teeth: If the remaining teeth do not provide adequate support, they may fail early, leading to additional complications.
  3. Severe Malocclusion: Where occlusal discrepancies make overdenture placement difficult.
  4. Limited inter-arch Space: cann't accommodate the overdenture components. 5 . Poor Oral Hygiene: increase the risk of decay or periodontal issues in retained abutments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group I
Indirect scanning by desktop scanner (for the conventional impression)
Scanning of intra-radicular impression by desktop scanner
Experimental: Group II
Intraoral scanning by Intraoral scanner A
Direct scanning of the intra-radicular canal by Intraoral scanner A
Experimental: Group III
Intraoral scanning by Intraoral scanner B
Direct scanning of the intra-radicular canal by Intraoral scanner B

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy
Time Frame: Immediately after scanning.
measure accuracy between the dimension of the prepared canal gained by intra-radicular impression and the dimension of the prepared canal directly by two different types of intraoral scanners
Immediately after scanning.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported comfort
Time Frame: Immediately after impression taking and scanning.
Patient-reported comfort (assessed via a Likert scale questionnaire) Scaled from 0-100 The highest score means excellent The lowest score means unsatisfactory
Immediately after impression taking and scanning.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Effect of Scanning Technology

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Scanning Devices

Clinical Trials on 3 shape desktop scanner

Subscribe