Dose Efficiency of Modern CT Scanners in Oncologic Scans

August 17, 2021 updated by: University Hospital Augsburg

On Dose Efficiency of Modern CT-Scanners in the Staging of Malignancies - a Prospective Randomized Study

CT-Staging is crucial for therapy planning of patients with malignancies. Dose efficiency and image quality are important parameters for these examinations. Up to now, scientific evidence of dose efficiency of modern CT scanners is mostly derived from retrospective analyses. This prospective study systematically analyzes dose efficiency and image quality of three modern CT scanners by randomization of patients who are scheduled for a CT scan to examine the status of malignancies. After giving informed consent and randomization (1:1:1), the CT scan will be performed at one of the modern CT scanners available at our department. This will allow a systematic allocation to the different scanners.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical suspicion of a malignancy or known / confirmed malignancy AND
  • indication for contrast-enhanced CT of the body confirmed by board-certified radiologist ('justifying indication' according to German/European radiation protection law) AND
  • patient (is able to give informed consent and) has given informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age < 18 years
  • known or suspected pregnancy
  • contraindications for contrast agent (renal failure, allergy, hyperthyroidism)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: CT scanner 1
Patients will undergo imaging on scanner 1.
Patients will undergo imaging on a modern CT scanner with spectral imaging capabilities. A dose neutral spectral acquisition mode will routinely be used. Contrast material protocol and scan ranges are similar among all three arms.
Other: CT scanner 2
Patients will undergo imaging on scanner 2.
Patients will undergo imaging on a modern 128 slice CT-scanner without spectral imaging capabilities. A standard acquisition protocol will be used. Contrast material protocol and scan ranges are similar among all three arms.
Other: CT scanner 3
Patients will undergo imaging on scanner 3.
Patients will undergo imaging on a modern 20 slice CT-scanner without spectral imaging capabilities. A standard acquisition protocol will be used. Contrast material protocol and scan ranges are similar among all three arms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Image Quality
Time Frame: 1 year
measured as signal, noise and modulation transfer function equivalent parameters derived from patient scans
1 year
Radiation Dose
Time Frame: 1 year
measured as x-ray tube parameters such as dose length product (DLP)
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Image Quality (entire cohort and for individual disease groups)
Time Frame: 1 year
measured by blinded evaluation by radiologists
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Florian Schwarz, MD, Universitatsklinikum Augsburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 17, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 17, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We plan to share individual participant data upon request (pending final approval by the data protection officer).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Requests for sharing individual participant data will be considered at the time of publication of the first manuscript containing result data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

We plan to share data on request at this point in time.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Scan at CT scanner 1

3
Subscribe