Central Vein Sign in Multiple Sclerosis Extension Study

February 18, 2026 updated by: Daniel Ontaneda, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common disease of the central nervous system that affects almost 1 million people in the United States. However, diagnosing MS can be difficult and often leads to misdiagnosis. More sensitive and specific biomarkers are needed to help with the diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluation of treatment response for MS. The central vein sign (CVS) and the paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL) are two biomarkers that have shown promise in improving diagnostic accuracy for MS.

The goal of this study is to provide pilot information on the long-term performance of the CVS and PRL to help diagnose and follow people with MS. The study will follow 40 participants over 48 months to determine if the CVS and PRL help make a diagnosis of MS and how they can be used to follow people with MS. The study will also examine how PRL and CVS change over 48 months. The results of this pilot study will inform the development of a grant application to extend 5-year follow-up for all 420 participants of the CAVS-MS study. The study will use high-resolution T2*-weighted MRI to detect the CVS and PRLs. An MRI of the brain with contrast will be used to examine CVS, PRL and longitudinal analysis of lesions that slowly grow over time (slowly expanding lesions [SELs]). The results of this study have the potential to improve the accuracy of diagnosing and treating MS.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The goal of this study is to provide pilot information on the long-term diagnostic and prognostic performance of the CVS and PRL. This study will be leveraged on the Central Vein Sign: A Diagnostic Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis (CAVS-MS)" (IRB 20-063) which is an NIH-supported (1U01NS116776-01), 2-year, prospective, international, multicenter study conducted by the North American Imaging in MS Cooperative (NAIMS) to evaluate CVS as an MRI-based diagnostic biomarker for immediate translation into clinical care. This study will extend follow-up in a pilot study of 3 sites to confirm the diagnostic performance of the CVS and PLR at 4-year follow-up and explore the prognostic value of PRLs in those with MS at 4 years.

The CVS is proposed as a diagnostic biomarker with improved sensitivity for a diagnosis of MS, while retaining diagnostic specificity - all in an-easy-to use diagnostic test that can be applied in patients with both typical and atypical disease presentation. There is extensive research demonstrating the ability of the CVS criteria to discriminate MS lesions from common mimickers, such as vascular disease and migraine. However, the CVS has mainly been applied in cross-sectional studies. In addition, the majority of these studies have focused analysis primarily on patients presenting with typical clinical events of demyelination (i.e. a classic CIS). This study will evaluate CVS criteria prospectively in individuals with typical and atypical MS presentations. In Aim 1, we will examine sensitivity and specificity of CVS criteria in conjunction with, and in comparison to, the McDonald Criteria. In Aim 2, we will examine CVS in a population where McDonald criteria explicitly cannot be applied. Because the likelihood of MS is lower in this group, we will focus on specificity, which is where the unmet need exists.

Although current MS diagnostic criteria are sensitive in most typical cases, the use of the CVS may hasten diagnosis in patients with low lesion numbers and those without dissemination in time. In the past, studies that informed revision of the diagnostic criteria used "clinically definite MS" (defined as two separate clinical events) as the definitive determination of a diagnosis. In the current treatment era, however, clinically definite MS is less relevant, since most patients will be diagnosed after a first clinical event (relapse) and will go on to start treatment prior to even having a second relapse. For this reason, we will use the 2017 McDonald Criteria as the "gold standard" for our proposed study.

Importantly, in the current study the CVS will be applied in a population where the McDonald Criteria are not applicable (atypical presentations) and where currently a significant unmet clinical need exists. Because the studies that informed the diagnostic criteria did not include patients presenting with atypical syndromes, such patients are not covered in the McDonald Criteria path, but are frequently given a diagnosis of MS on the basis of MRI findings. To address this limitation, we will examine the presence of CVS as a predictor of development of future clinical events, within a 24-month period, that would satisfy the 2017 McDonald Criteria. Thus, the results of this study will have a significant impact on both improving sensitivity in those presenting with typical presentations and providing a specific test for MS in those with atypical presentations, thereby avoiding unnecessary costs associated with misdiagnosis. We will leverage the NAIMS Cooperative to conduct a multicenter study, based on an initial cross-sectional pilot study using the CVS criteria as a diagnostic biomarker for MS.

The CVS and PRL have emerged as specific and sensitive biomarkers for MS with pathologic specificity and are posed to improve diagnostic accuracy in MS. The CVS is a radiological sign that demonstrates perivenular demyelination that is specific for MS.39 PRL are a diagnostic biomarker of chronic active lesions, characterized by a core of demyelinated tissue surrounded by activated microglia with iron accumulation, making them visible on high-resolution T2*-weighted imaging.40 The definitions of both CVS and PRL have already been defined and operationalized as published by the North American Imaging in MS Cooperative (NAIMS) in two separate publications38,41 and will be incorporated into the next diagnostic criteria for MS.42 Analysis of the CAVS Pilot Study (funded by the Race to Erase MS foundation) showed that selecting up to 6 CVS+ lesions had a specificity of 98% for a diagnosis of MS,43 and definitive diagnostic performance of both the CVS and PRL is currently under way in the prospective CAVS-MS study to examine the diagnostic performance of the CVS in 420 participants who presented to 11 NAIMS sites for a diagnostic evaluation of MS with both typical and atypical presentations. This study is following patients who presented to MS Centers for a diagnostic evaluation of MS over the course of 24 months. CAVS-MS is also leveraging acquisition of the T2*-weighted segmented echo-planar imaging to extract phase images and test the diagnostic performance of PRLs.

In addition to the use of T2*-weighted images to improve the diagnosis of MS, the identification of PRL lesions in patients with MS may also serve as a prognostic marker of the disease. Studies have found that PRL are radiological biomarkers of chronic active lesions, occur despite the use of disease modifying treatment, and are associated with greater accumulation of disability.44 The slowly expanding lesion (SEL) is another proposed biomarker of chronic active lesion that employs a Jacobian determinant to identify lesions with concentric and constant growth over serial images.45 Current studies demonstrate an imperfect overlap between PRL and SEL,46 and comparative studies of these markers early in the disease are needed.47

The CAVS-MS study, therefore, is an ideal dataset on which to test both the diagnostic and prognostic properties of CVS and PRLS. However, 24-month follow-up may be insufficient time to detect new demyelinating events, especially in individuals with atypical presentations including radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS). 24 months may also be too short to detect worsening disability in those diagnosed with MS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Ontaneda, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of Pennsylvania
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Russell Shinohara
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Schindler

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must be enrolled in and meet all inclusion criteria of the CAVS-MS study.
  • Must have participated in the CAVS-MS study and have completed month 24 visits.
  • Able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to MRI studies; metal or metal implants incompatible with MRI
  • Inability to tolerate MRI due to claustrophobia or known excessive movement (e.g. tremor).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Confirmed diagnosis of MS at the end of the CAVS-MS study
The study will include an MRI
Experimental: Unconfirmed diagnosis of MS (at risk for MS) at the end of the CAVS-MS study
The study will include an MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MRI Outcomes- CVS
Time Frame: Change assessed over 48 months. Scans done in the CAVS-MS core study (Baseline and Month 24) will be compared to scan done at Month 48.
An MRI will be done at the Month 48 visit. Central veins will be counted and lesions will be considered CVS+ using specified criteria. CVS will be determined using Select6, Select3* by already trained raters from the core CAVS-MS study and using automated lesion analysis.
Change assessed over 48 months. Scans done in the CAVS-MS core study (Baseline and Month 24) will be compared to scan done at Month 48.
MRI Outcomes- PRL
Time Frame: Change assessed over 48 months. Scans done in the CAVS-MS core study (Baseline and Month 24) will be compared to scan done at Month 48.
An MRI will be done at the Month 48 visit. Periventricular rim lesions (PRL) will be counted using specified criteria by already trained raters from the CAVS-MS core study and using automated lesion analysis. The automated lesions analysis will also determine lesion volume and RIM volume.
Change assessed over 48 months. Scans done in the CAVS-MS core study (Baseline and Month 24) will be compared to scan done at Month 48.
Clinical Outcomes- Diagnosis of MS by 2017 Diagnostic Criteria
Time Frame: McDonald criteria will be reviewed at Month 48.
Determination of a diagnosis of MS using the McDonald Criteria 2017 will be conducted by a central adjudication committee. McDonald diagnostic criteria for MS are clinical, radiographic, and laboratory criteria used in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Members of the adjudication committee will separately review the clinical data, laboratory testing, and study MRIs of each participant at Month 48.
McDonald criteria will be reviewed at Month 48.
Clinical Outcomes- EDSS
Time Frame: EDSS will be assessed at the Month 48 visit.
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a standardized assessment that will be used to measure the degree of disability due to MS using a 0-10 scale. 0 meaning no disability and 10 meaning death due to MS.
EDSS will be assessed at the Month 48 visit.
Clinical Outcomes- Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC-4)
Time Frame: MSFC-4 will be assessed at the Month 48 visit.

The MSFC-4 is group of standardized assessments that are used to measure the degree of disability due to MS. The z-scores for the tests are averaged to create the final MSFC score. A higher score indicates better function.

These assessments include:

Timed 25 Foot Walk (lower extremity function) 9-Hole Peg Test (upper extremity function) Symbol Digit Modalities Test (processing speed) Low-Contrast Letter Acuity (visual function)

MSFC-4 will be assessed at the Month 48 visit.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Ontaneda, MD, PHD, The Cleveland Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Pascal Sati, PHD, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on MRI Contrast

Subscribe