Comparison of Mobile Application and Traditional Methods in Classification (CMATMCPP:ACS)

February 22, 2026 updated by: Tuğba ŞAHİN

Comparison of Mobile Application and Traditional Methods in Classification of Periodontitis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

In this study, periodontal disease classifications of patients with periodontitis were performed using a mobile application and conventional methods. A total of 122 patients with periodontitis who presented to the Periodontology Clinic of the Faculty of Dentistry at Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University were included in the study. The classification of periodontitis was carried out according to the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions and the EFP S3-level clinical practice guideline.

In the study, periodontal classification of 122 patients with periodontitis was performed using a mobile application (Peribrain) by a student, a clinical student (manual), and a clinician (manual). In the mobile application, the following parameters were assessed: age, presence of diabetes, smoking status, deepest periodontal pocket depth, interproximal attachment loss, tooth loss, furcation defects, bite collapse, tooth migration, radiographic interproximal bone loss (%), and vertical bone loss.

For classification, plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing, gingival recession, and clinical attachment level were measured in the patients. The results of the three groups were compared with each other.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye), 14030
        • Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversity

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with periodontitis were included in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants aged between 18 and 65 years who were diagnosed with periodontitis
  • Participants did not have any intellectual disabilities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with intellectual disability
  • Individuals with severe suicidal tendency
  • Individuals with dementia
  • Individuals with psychosis
  • Individuals receiving long-term corticosteroid therapy
  • Pregnant or lactating individuals

Individuals who had received periodontal treatment within the past six months

Individuals currently using antibiotics

Individuals with uncontrolled systemic diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
İntern group: Fifth-year dental studentswho performed for classification.
Periobrain: Fifth-year dental students using Periobrain for classification.
Periodontal classifications performed manually and using a mobile application were compared.
Faculty member: Assistant professor who performed the classification.
Periodontal classifications performed manually and using a mobile application were compared.
Periobrain: Fifth-year dental students using Periobrain for classification.
Faculty member: Assistant professor who performed the classification.
Periodontal classifications performed manually and using a mobile application were compared.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Periodontal classification
Time Frame: Baseline
Determination of the stage and grade of periodontitis according to the latest classification.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
periodontal pocket depth (PPD)
Time Frame: Baseline
Periodontal pocket depth measured in millimeters using a Williams periodontal probe. The distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the periodontal pocket was recorded at each site.
Baseline
Bleeding on probing (BOP)
Time Frame: Baseline
Bleeding on probing assessed using a periodontal probe. After gently inserting the probe into the gingival sulcus and moving it laterally along the pocket wall, bleeding was recorded as present (+) or absent (-).pocket and gently moved laterally along the pocket wall. + is maximum and - is minimum. + indicates a worse outcome.
Baseline
Plaque index (PI)
Time Frame: Baseline
Oral hygiene status assessed using the Plaque Index, which measures dental plaque accumulation adjacent to the gingival margin. Scores range from 0 (no plaque) to 3 (abundant plaque), with higher scores indicating poorer oral hygiene.
Baseline
Gingival index (GI)
Time Frame: Baseline
Gingival inflammation assessed using the Löe and Silness Gingival Index. Each site was scored on a 0-3 scale, where 0 = normal gingiva and 3 = severe inflammation with edema, redness, and spontaneous bleeding. Higher scores indicate worsening gingival inflammation.
Baseline
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: Baseline
Clinical attachment level measured in millimeters using a periodontal probe. CAL was calculated as the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket and used to assess periodontal tissue support loss.
Baseline
Gingival recession (GR)
Time Frame: Baseline
Gingival recession is the apical migration of the gingival margin away from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), resulting in the exposure of the root surface of a tooth.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontal Disease (Diagnosis)

Clinical Trials on Classification

Subscribe