HPV ctDNA Response-Adapted Chemoradiation +/- Retifanlimab Treatment in Advanced-Stage Anal Cancer

February 13, 2026 updated by: Jennifer Dorth

ctHPVDNA Adapted ChemoRadiation +/- Retifanlimab Treatment in Locally-Advanced Anal Cancer (CHART-AC)

This study is for people who have anal cancer and have not yet had treatment. The regular treatment for people who have anal cancer is chemoradiation therapy (CRT). CRT is when chemotherapy and radiation therapy are given at the same time. Studies show that CRT works well to treat anal cancer and prevents many people from needing surgery which may require a colostomy bag. Doctors know that CRT is an effective way to treat anal cancer. But, they are doing studies to find out how much dose of radiation and chemotherapy should be given during the CRT. Higher doses of chemotherapy and radiation could increase the risk of side effects, but lowering the dose of chemoradiation has the risk of not being as effective to treat the cancer. One way to predict whether participants need higher or lower doses of radiation therapy is to do a blood test called ctDNA (circulating tumor DNA) to test for the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV). This test is done at certain times while participants are getting CRT. This has been shown to be a marker for the presence of anal cancer.

In this study, doctors will tailor lower versus higher doses of CRT based on the tumor response that is measured by ctDNA. The purpose of this study is to see if customizing the dose of chemoradiation based on the amount of ctDNA will increase survival in participants with anal cancer and/or decrease the risk of side effects. Some participants in this study whose cancer does not respond as well to the CRT may have the opportunity to receive a drug called Retifanlimab that stimulates the body's immune system. Retifanlimab is approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for treating anal cancer that is recurrent or metastatic since there is proven benefit in these situations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For people with advanced-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA), there is a great need to adjust the amount of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) they receive based on how well they are responding to the treatment. This allows doctors to increase the dose for people whose cancer is not getting better or to decrease the dose for people whose cancer is getting better from the treatment. Decreasing the dose for people who don't need it is important so that they might have a lower risk of negative side effects of CRT. Doctors may be able to use HPV ctDNA as a biomarker to figure out how people's cancer is responding to CRT in order to make these changes to dosage.

For this study, investigators will change the dosage of CRT that participants receive based on HPV ctDNA response at various points throughout treatment. People who have a favorable response will have their CRT dosage decreased. Participants who have an intermediate response will have their CRT dosage unchanged. Participants who have an unfavorable response will have their CRT dosage increased and receive Retifanlimab after CRT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

33

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contact:
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joel Saltzman, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must have histologically proven stage T1-4N+M0 or T3-T4N0M0 anal canal or anal margin squamous cell carcinoma. This may include tumors of non-keratinizing histology such as basaloid, transitional cell or cloacogenic histology. Special considerations include the following:

    • Participants with excision of the primary tumor but with node positive disease or residual disease at the primary if T3-T4N0 will be eligible.
  • Age ≥18 years
  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Creatinine clearance >30 ml/min by Cockcroft-Gault Equation.
  • HIV-infected participants are eligible if they meet the following eligibility criteria:

    • A CD4 T-cell count >= 200/mm3 and a viral load < 200 copies/mm3
    • No history of AIDS-related complications within past year other than history of low CD4+ T-cell count (>200/mm3) prior to initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy.
    • Participant must be healthy on the basis of HIV disease with high likelihood of near normal life span were it not for the anal cancer.
    • Participant MUST receive appropriate care and treatment for HIV infection, including antiretroviral medications when clinically indicated, and should be under the care of a physician experienced in HIV management. Participants will be eligible regardless of antiretroviral medication provided the regimen has been stable for at least 4 weeks.
    • Participants must be PPD negative. Alternatively, the QuantiFERON-TB assay can be used. An individual is considered positive for M. tuberculosis infection if the IFN-γ response to TB antigens is above the test cut-off (after subtracting the background IFN-γ response in the negative control). The result must be obtained within 20 weeks prior to enrollment. PPD positive (or Quantiferon assay positive) participants are permitted if prophylaxis has been completed prior to enrollment.
  • Tumor size must be documented based on physical examination including digital rectal exam and/or anoscopy/proctoscopy within 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Staging imaging studies must include a PET scan AND either a CT with contrast of the abdomen/pelvis or an MRI with contrast of the pelvis. It is preferred that participants receive contrast. For participants with an allergy who cannot receive pre-medication, or any other reason they can't receive IV contrast, it is recommended that they undergo an MRI of the pelvis.
  • Participant must have no history of prior chemotherapy for anal cancer.
  • Participant must not have had prior potentially curative surgery (i.e. abdominal-perineal resection) for carcinoma of the anus. However, participants who undergo local excision or excisional biopsy are eligible provided there was tumor involvement of the anal canal and/or anal verge prior to the resection, if the margins were positive, and/or if the stage is T2N0 based on tumor size before the procedure. This means that participants with T1N0M0 anal margin squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgical excision with negative margins and no involvement of the anal verge and/or anal canal are not eligible.
  • Participant must not be receiving any other standard anti-cancer therapy or experimental agent.
  • Participant must not have intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection or psychiatric/social situations that, in the judgement of the investigator, would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Participant must not have had significant cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to enrollment that has not been treated/controlled in the opinion of the treating investigators including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack, symptomatic coronary artery disease, symptomatic congestive heart failure, or uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Participant must not have a history of a different malignancy unless they are deemed by the investigator to be at low risk of recurrence.
  • Participants who are on anti-coagulation with warfarin within 2 weeks prior to enrollment must use an alternative anti-coagulant if planned to receive Capecitabine, otherwise, they must receive infusional 5-FU.

    • NOTE: Low molecular weight heparin is permitted provided the participant's PT/INR is < 1.5. Participants who will received capecitabine and are on Dilantin for a seizure disorder must have Dilantin levels checked weekly.
  • Participants must have normal organ and marrow function as defined below:

    • Hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dl
    • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcL
    • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mcL
    • Total bilirubin must be <1.5 X institutional ULN OR conjugated bilirubin <= institutional ULN if total bilirubin > 1.5 X ULN. Note that conjugated bilirubin only needs to be tested if total bilirubin >1.5 X ULN. Participants with a known history of Gilbert's disease are eligible without regard to bilirubin and liver function tests at the discretion of the treating physician.
    • AST/ALT must be </= 2.5 X institutional ULN (participants with a known history of Gilbert's disease are eligible without regard to bilirubin and liver function tests at the discretion of the treating physician).
    • Albumin >/= 3.0 g/dL
  • Women must not be pregnant or breast-feeding because the study treatment may cause harm to an unborn fetus or breastfeeding child. A female of childbearing potential is defined as any woman, regardless of sexual orientation, or whether they have undergone a tubal ligation, who meets the following criteria: 1) has achieved menarche at some point, 2) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or 3) has not been naturally postmenopausal (amenorrhea following cancer therapy does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months). Women of childbearing potential and sexually active males must agree to use accepted and effective method(s) of contraception or to abstain from sexual intercourse for the duration of their participation in the study and for at least six months after the completion of treatment.
  • Participants must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  • Participants must have testing DPYD deficiency per institutional standards and must not be homozygous for DPYD deficiency.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior pelvic radiation or previous radiation that would result in overlapping radiation fields.
  • History of allergic reactions to compounds similar to capecitabine,
  • Participants with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment has the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Participants with inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma, or known homozygosity for DPYD deficiency.
  • Participants with a fistula between the tumor and invaded organ
  • Participant must not have active autoimmune disease or inflammatory bowel disease that has required systemic treatment in past 2 years
  • No prior treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibody)
  • No participants with immunodeficiency or receiving systemic steroid therapy equivalent to > 10 mg prednisone per day or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of study medication. Topical corticosteroid or occasional inhaled corticosteroids are allowed.
  • No live vaccines within 30 days prior to the first dose of trial treatment and while participating in the trial. Examples of live vaccines include, but are not limited to, the following: measles, mumps, rubella, chicken pox, yellow fever, rabies, BCG, and typhoid (oral) vaccine. Seasonal influenza vaccines for injection are generally killed virus vaccines and are allowed; however, intranasal influenza vaccines (e.g., Flu-Mist®) are live attenuated vaccines and are not allowed.
  • Participants must not have known interstitial lung disease that is symptomatic or may interfere with the detection or management of suspected drug-related pulmonary toxicity
  • Participants must not have a history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to retifanlimab.
  • Participants are excluded if known to be homozygous for Dihydropyrimidine Dehydronase

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Chemoradiation based on HPV ctDNA response

All participants will receive CRT for one cycle (4 weeks), while undergoing HPV ctDNA testing. Investigators will then modify the treatment plan based on HPV ctDNA response:

  • Favorable response: Dose reduction (total of 28 fractions of CRT)
  • Intermediate response: Standard dose (total of 30 fractions of CRT)
  • Unfavorable response: Dose-intensification (total of 34 fractions of CRT)

Total radiation doses per response group:

  • Favorable response: 5040 cGy in 28 fractions
  • Intermediate response: 5400 cGy in 30 fractions
  • Unfavorable response: 6120 cGy in 34 fractions
  1. Mitomycin-C(MMC) 12 mg/m2 on day 1

    AND one of the following:

  2. Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily on all days of radiotherapy for all response groups OR 5-Fluorouracil: 1000 mg/m²/day as a continuous infusion for 96 hours on days 1-4 and 29-32

Only participants who have an unfavorable response to treatment (measured on blood tests at Weeks 4 and 5) will be eligible to receive Retifanlimab.

Retifanlimab is a 500 mg infusion administered intravenously (by IV) over 30 minutes and begins two weeks after participants finish chemoradiation therapy (at Weeks 7-9). Retifanlimab will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle (each cycle is 4 weeks) as tolerated for up to 1 year.

Other Names:
  • ZYNYZ

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1-year Disease-free survival (DFS) by response subgroup
Time Frame: 1 year
DFS is defined the occurrence of progression of local disease, distant metastases, second primary or death. 1-year DFS, will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and be compared using a 0.05-level one-sided two-proportion test. DFS will be compared among the three subgroups: favorable response subgroup, intermediate response subgroup, unfavorable response subgroup.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-year disease free survival by response subgroup
Time Frame: 2 years
DFS is defined the occurrence of progression of local disease, distant metastases, second primary or death. 2-year DFS, will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and be compared using a 0.05-level one-sided two-proportion test. DFS will be compared among the three subgroups: favorable response subgroup, intermediate response subgroup, unfavorable response subgroup.
2 years
1-year disease control by response subgroup
Time Frame: 1 year

Disease control is defined as a composite endpoint that includes failure to achieve a clinical response or subsequent disease recurrence. Achieving a clinical response includes the proportion of participants who achieve complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

CR is defined as the absence of tumor on re-staging scans and explant or mucosal biopsies (if applicable).

PR is defined as a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD).

PD is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm) or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

Disease control will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and be compared using a 0.05-level one-sided two-proportion test.

1 year
2-year disease control by response subgroup
Time Frame: 2 years

Disease control is defined as a composite endpoint that includes failure to achieve a clinical response or subsequent disease recurrence. Achieving a clinical response includes the proportion of participants who achieve complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

CR is defined as the absence of tumor on re-staging scans and explant or mucosal biopsies (if applicable).

PR is defined as a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD).

PD is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm) or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

Disease control will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and be compared using a 0.05-level one-sided two-proportion test.

2 years
Toxicity Index as assessed by the number of CTCAE events
Time Frame: 3 months post-treatment (up to 2 years)
Events will be graded per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.
3 months post-treatment (up to 2 years)
Change in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) as assessed by FISI (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Year 2

FISI measures fecal incontinence by four types of leakage: gas, mucus, liquid, solid. Participants answer a total of 5 questions ranking the frequency and severity of symptoms on 5-point Likert scale from 0 ("No symptoms" or "Not bothersome") to 5 ("Extremely severe" or "Always") for each type of leakage. Higher scores indicate higher incontinence severity.

Changes in PRO will be summarized, visualized for each response subgroup. A generalized linear mixed model will be fitted to compare the clinically meaningful changes between groups.

Baseline (Day 1), Year 2
Change in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) as assessed by FIQoL (Fecal Incontinence quality of life scale)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Year 2

FIQoL has a total of four questions to assess quality of life related to fecal incontinence. One questions asks participants to rank their general health on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("Excellent") to 5 ("Poor"). One question with a total of 13 sub-questions asks participants to rank their symptom frequency on a 4-point Likert scale from 4 ("Most of the time") to 0 ("None of the time"). One question asks participants to rank their feelings around symptoms according to how much they agree with 14 statements on a Likert scale from 4 ("Strongly agree") to 0 ("Strongly disagree"). One question asks participants to rank negative feelings of well-being on a 6-point Likert scale from 1 ("Extremely so") to 6 ("Not at all"). Higher scores indicate high quality of life.

Changes in PRO will be summarized, visualized for each response subgroup. A generalized linear mixed model will be fitted to compare the clinically meaningful changes between groups.

Baseline (Day 1), Year 2
Change in participant-reported outcomes (PRO) as assessed by PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction (SexFS) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Year 2

SexFS has a total of nine questions that assess for sexual function and satisfaction. Three questions ask participants to rank frequency of sexual interest on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 ("Not at all) to 4 ("Very much"). Two questions ask participants to rank satisfaction on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 ("Very dissatisfied") to 7 ("Very satisfied"). Two additional questions assess sexual desire on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 ("Never") to 4 ("Always"). Two final questions ask participants if they have recently had sexual activity (Yes/No) and, if "No," to list reasons why they have not. Higher scores indicate greater sexual function and satisfaction.

Changes in PRO will be summarized, visualized for each response subgroup. A generalized linear mixed model will be fitted to compare the clinically meaningful changes between groups.

Baseline (Day 1), Year 2
Change in participant-reported outcomes (PRO) as assessed by Sexual Function-Vaginal Changes Questionnaire (SVQ)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Year 2

SVQ is a 27-item questionnaire where participants answer questions about their sexual function and vaginal changes before and after cancer. Twenty questions about current sexual function are answered on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"). Seven additional questions ask about changes that have occurred since having cancer and are answered on a 3-point Likert scale from 1 ("Less now than before") to 3 ("More now than before"). Higher scores indicate greater sexual function.

Changes in PRO will be summarized, visualized for each response subgroup. A generalized linear mixed model will be fitted to compare the clinically meaningful changes between groups.

Baseline (Day 1), Year 2
Change in participant-reported outcomes (PRO) as assessed by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Year 2

IIEF is a 15-item questionnaire that assesses effects of erectile problems on sexual functioning and well-being. All 15 questions are a 6-point Likert scale from 0 ("No/None" or "Very dissatisfied") to 5 ("Almost always or always" or "Very satisfied"). Higher scores indicate greater erectile function.

Changes in PRO will be summarized, visualized for each response subgroup. A generalized linear mixed model will be fitted to compare the clinically meaningful changes between groups.

Baseline (Day 1), Year 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Dorth, MD, MHSc, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospitals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

During the study and for 6 months after the study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anal Cancer

Clinical Trials on HPV ctDNA Response based radiation

Subscribe