Benefits of Physical Activity During the School Day to Reduce Mental Fatigue and Optimize Cognitive and Psychosocial Processes in Secondary School Students (MENTALFIT)

February 16, 2026 updated by: Inmaculada González Ponce, University of Extremadura
The main aim of the MENTALFIT project is to test the effectiveness of physically active teaching methodologies to reduce mental fatigue and optimize cognitive, emotional, and motivational processes in secondary school students. Specifically, the study aims to examine differences depending on the type of physically active strategy implemented (physically active learning, active breaks, and active recesses) on students' mental fatigue, cognitive function, group dynamics, and motivational processes. Furthermore, the project aims to compare whether learning and academic performance are similar in traditional classes versus classes employing a physically active teaching methodology. Finally, a secondary objective of the project is to create and validate new instruments to assess the different psychobiological and educational processes included in this project.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background and Rationale Mental Fatigue (MF) is a dynamic psychobiological state induced by prolonged cognitive and emotional demands. In educational contexts, particularly in secondary education, it manifests as a cascading deterioration affecting attention, executive function, emotional regulation, and learning capacity. Despite its relevance, MF remains understudied in adolescents. Secondary school students face substantial sedentary demands, spending an average of 78% of the school day in sedentary activities. These schedules, characterized by extended periods of continuous instruction with minimal breaks, create conditions conducive to MF development. The MENTALFIT project aims to address this by reintegrating movement into school routines to counteract MF and its associated cognitive decrements.

Study Design and Methodology This quasi-experimental study (Study 3 of the MENTALFIT overarching protocol) employs a multifactorial design to evaluate the differential effectiveness of three physical activity (PA) interventions. The study is conducted over a full academic year (2024-2025) across several secondary schools in Extremadura, Spain. The sample comprises adolescents in their 3rd and 4th year of secondary education (aged 13-17).

The sample is divided into four groups: one control group ("business as usual") and three experimental groups. To compare the effectiveness of different approaches, each experimental center implements three distinct physically active strategies in a counterbalanced rotation across the three trimesters. This ensures that each experimental group receives every type of intervention while controlling for order effects.

Intervention Components

The multicomponent intervention includes:

Physically Active Lessons (PAL): Integrating motor activities with curriculum content.

Active Breaks (AB): Short bouts of physical activity delivered between or during lessons.

Active Recess (AR): Structured opportunities for physical activity during break times.

Data Collection Data are collected at six measurement points throughout the academic year (at the beginning and end of each trimester). Assessments include standardized self-report measures evaluating mental fatigue perception, academic burnout, school engagement, academic motivation, and well-being. Furthermore, objective measures are collected, including academic grades (GPA), computerised neuropsychological batteries (Stroop, PASAT, PVT-B), continuous heart rate and physical activity monitoring via Fitbit devices, and brain activity via Electroencephalography (EEG) in a selected subsample to capture objective neural correlates of mental fatigue.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

434

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cáceres, Spain, 10003
        • University of Extremadura

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolment in the 3rd or 4th year of compulsory secondary education (Educación Secundaria Obligatoria).
  • Attending one of the participating secondary schools.
  • Providing written informed consent from parents/guardians and verbal assent from the students.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical or physical inability to participate in the physically active interventions.
  • Refusal to participate or lack of parental consent.
  • Schools participating in any other physical activity or health promotion program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Rotation Sequence A
Experimental center 1. Participants will receive all three interventions in a counterbalanced rotation across the academic year (e.g., Physically Active Lessons in Trimester 1, Active Breaks in Trimester 2, and Active Recess in Trimester 3).
AB are implemented three times per week on days without physical education classes, providing a total of six active break sessions weekly (two per day on intervention days). Each session consists of 5 minutes of physical activity scheduled after the second and fifth academic periods to interrupt prolonged sedentary behaviour. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester. A specialised facilitator provides direct support during all intervention sessions to coordinate the timing and implementation of activities.
Other Names:
  • AB
PAL integrates physical movement into academic instruction. Two 55-minute lessons per week are dedicated to integrating motor activities with curriculum content. The intervention is coordinated by a specialised facilitator who co-designs the sessions with subject-matter teachers to maintain academic rigor while promoting physical engagement. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester.
Other Names:
  • PAL
AR provides structured opportunities for physical activity during school breaks. Every day of the week, two activities are offered during recess: one involving moderate physical activity and another involving more vigorous or intense activity (alternative games). The intervention modifies playground spaces and provides diverse sports equipment to encourage movement. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester. A specialised facilitator provides direct support during all intervention sessions to coordinate the implementation of the activities.
Other Names:
  • AR
Experimental: Experimental: Rotation Sequence B
Experimental center 2. Participants will receive all three interventions in a counterbalanced rotation across the academic year (e.g., Active Breaks in Trimester 1, Active Recess in Trimester 2, and Physically Active Lessons in Trimester 3).
AB are implemented three times per week on days without physical education classes, providing a total of six active break sessions weekly (two per day on intervention days). Each session consists of 5 minutes of physical activity scheduled after the second and fifth academic periods to interrupt prolonged sedentary behaviour. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester. A specialised facilitator provides direct support during all intervention sessions to coordinate the timing and implementation of activities.
Other Names:
  • AB
PAL integrates physical movement into academic instruction. Two 55-minute lessons per week are dedicated to integrating motor activities with curriculum content. The intervention is coordinated by a specialised facilitator who co-designs the sessions with subject-matter teachers to maintain academic rigor while promoting physical engagement. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester.
Other Names:
  • PAL
AR provides structured opportunities for physical activity during school breaks. Every day of the week, two activities are offered during recess: one involving moderate physical activity and another involving more vigorous or intense activity (alternative games). The intervention modifies playground spaces and provides diverse sports equipment to encourage movement. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester. A specialised facilitator provides direct support during all intervention sessions to coordinate the implementation of the activities.
Other Names:
  • AR
Experimental: Experimental: Rotation Sequence C
Experimental center 3. Participants will receive all three interventions in a counterbalanced rotation across the academic year (e.g., Active Recess in Trimester 1, Physically Active Lessons in Trimester 2, and Active Breaks in Trimester 3).
AB are implemented three times per week on days without physical education classes, providing a total of six active break sessions weekly (two per day on intervention days). Each session consists of 5 minutes of physical activity scheduled after the second and fifth academic periods to interrupt prolonged sedentary behaviour. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester. A specialised facilitator provides direct support during all intervention sessions to coordinate the timing and implementation of activities.
Other Names:
  • AB
PAL integrates physical movement into academic instruction. Two 55-minute lessons per week are dedicated to integrating motor activities with curriculum content. The intervention is coordinated by a specialised facilitator who co-designs the sessions with subject-matter teachers to maintain academic rigor while promoting physical engagement. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester.
Other Names:
  • PAL
AR provides structured opportunities for physical activity during school breaks. Every day of the week, two activities are offered during recess: one involving moderate physical activity and another involving more vigorous or intense activity (alternative games). The intervention modifies playground spaces and provides diverse sports equipment to encourage movement. Delivered over 9 weeks per trimester. A specialised facilitator provides direct support during all intervention sessions to coordinate the implementation of the activities.
Other Names:
  • AR
No Intervention: No Intervention: Control Group
The control group will maintain their regular academic schedule and usual classroom routines (business as usual) without any additional physically active interventions during the academic year.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Mental Fatigue (VAS-F)
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year: beginning and end of trimesters 1, 2, and 3 (Baseline up to 9 months).
Assessed through the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F; Smith et al., 2019). It is a 100mm single-item measure of overall fatigue intensity. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a higher perception of mental fatigue.
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year: beginning and end of trimesters 1, 2, and 3 (Baseline up to 9 months).
Multidimensional Mental Fatigue (PedsQL MFS)
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (Varni & Limbers, 2008), 9-item Spanish version. It measures general, sleep/rest, and cognitive fatigue. A composite score is calculated as the mean across items. Higher scores indicate greater problems with fatigue.
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Objective Neurophysiological Mental Fatigue (Brain Activity)
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).
Assessed via EEG recordings using Emotiv EPOC X headsets. Recordings are taken during resting-state and cognitive tasks (Stroop, PASAT, PVT-B) to characterize neural correlates (theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands) of cognitive performance under conditions of mental fatigue.
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).
Objective Cardiovascular Indicators (Heart Rate and HRV)
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).
Fitbit Charge 6 devices worn continuously for one week at each measurement point to provide 24-hour assessments of heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) as indicators of fatigue and autonomic nervous system state.
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Physical Activity and Sleep Patterns
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).
Fitbit Charge 6 devices worn continuously for one week providing assessments of sleep metrics (duration, efficiency) and PA patterns (steps, intensity minutes, sedentary time).
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).
Self-reported Physical Activity Frequency
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Assessed via a single-item question asking participants about their weekly physical activity volume (including PE classes and outside school). Rated on a 5-point scale ranging from "None" to "More than 7 hours".
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Self-reported Sleep Duration
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Assessed via a single-item question asking about the average hours of sleep per day (including night sleep and naps). Responses range from "Less than 3 hours" to "More than 10 hours".
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Self-reported Screen Time
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Assessed separately for weekdays and weekends via a single question about hours spent on screens (TV, mobile, video games, social media). Rated on a 7-point scale ranging from "0 minutes" to "5 hours or more".
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Cognitive Performance (Neuropsychological Battery)
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).
A computerized battery assessing cognitive inhibition, selective attention, working memory, and sustained attention using three specific tasks: the Stroop task, the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), and the Psychomotor Vigilance Task-Brief (PVT-B).
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year in a subsample of 160 students (Baseline up to 9 months).
Perceived Executive Functioning (WEBEX)
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Perceived difficulties and efficacy in everyday executive functioning evaluated using the WEBEX Scale (Morea & Calvete, 2020).
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Academic Performance (GPA)
Time Frame: Assessed at 3 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Grade point average (GPA) obtained from students' official academic records across all compulsory subjects.
Assessed at 3 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Academic Burnout (MBI-SS)
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (12 items). Comprises three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic efficacy. A composite burnout score is calculated.
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
School Engagement (UWES-S)
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Assessed using 3 items from the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students measuring vigor, dedication, and absorption. Items are rated on a 7-point scale (0-6).
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Perceived Mental Load
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Assessed using an adapted 3-item scale (Díaz-García et al., 2018) measuring perceived physical, cognitive, and emotional demands of the school week. Rated on an 11-point scale (0-10).
Assessed at 6 time points across the academic year (Baseline up to 9 months).
Motivation towards Exercise (BREQ-3)
Time Frame: Assessed at 3 time points: beginning, middle, and end of the academic year (Months 0, 4.5, and 9).
Assessed using 6 items representing the six regulation types of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3. Rated on a 5-point scale (0-4).
Assessed at 3 time points: beginning, middle, and end of the academic year (Months 0, 4.5, and 9).
Classroom Social Dynamics (CCQ-SF)
Time Frame: Assessed at 3 time points: at the end of trimesters 1, 2, and 3 (Months 3, 6, and 9).
Class Cohesion Questionnaire Short-Form (Leo et al., 2023) measuring task and social cohesion (6 items total).
Assessed at 3 time points: at the end of trimesters 1, 2, and 3 (Months 3, 6, and 9).
Subjective Happiness (SHS)
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 time points: beginning and end of the academic year (Month 0 and Month 9).
Assessed using the Spanish adaptation of the Subjective Happiness Scale (Extremera & Fernández-Berrocal, 2014).
Assessed at 2 time points: beginning and end of the academic year (Month 0 and Month 9).
Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (KIDMED 2.0)
Time Frame: Assessed at measurement point 5 (approximately Month 7.5 of the academic year).
Assessed using the KIDMED 2.0 questionnaire (Spanish version; López-Gajardo et al., 2022) to evaluate adherence to the Mediterranean diet. Higher scores indicate better adherence to healthy dietary habits.
Assessed at measurement point 5 (approximately Month 7.5 of the academic year).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Inmaculada González-Ponce, PhD, University of Extremadura - Faculty of Teacher Training
  • Principal Investigator: Tomás García-Calvo, PhD, University of Extremadura - Faculty of Sport Science
  • Study Director: Rosa Ayuso-Moreno, MSc, University of Extremadura - Faculty of Sport Science

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the published article will be shared. This includes data regarding self-reported mental fatigue, cognitive performance, psychosocial variables, and objective physical activity metrics, after removing any identifying information to protect the privacy of the adolescent participants.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available beginning 6 months following the publication of the main study findings and will remain accessible for up to 5 years after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to the de-identified IPD will be granted to qualified academic researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals must be directed to the Principal Investigator or the corresponding author of the published manuscript. To gain access, data requestors must sign a formal data access agreement confirming that the data will only be used for the approved research purposes and that no attempts will be made to re-identify the participants.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Fatigue

Clinical Trials on Active breaks

Subscribe