Comparison of Smartphone and Community-Based Delivery of the Otago Exercise Program for Fall Risk in Older Adults

February 24, 2026 updated by: Vipul Lugade, Binghamton University

Effectiveness of Smartphone-Based Versus Community-Based Otago Exercise Programs for Fall Risk Reduction in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The long-term goal of this project is to effectively bridge the research-clinic-community gap and to foster partnerships that support the implementation, utilization, and advocacy of evidence-based fall prevention programs in the older adult community. The Otago Exercise Program (OEP) is an evidence-based fall prevention program that has been shown to reduce falls and fall-related injuries among older adults. Traditionally, OEP is delivered in the home by a physical therapist and focuses on muscle strengthening and balance training. Despite its proven effectiveness, adherence and compliance rates have been low. The personnel and resource demands of program delivery, along with challenges in monitoring participant adherence, represent significant barriers to broader implementation. Alternative delivery systems using remote and community-based platforms may help address these limitations.

Specific Aim 1: To compare the effectiveness of two delivery modes of the Otago Exercise Program: a remotely delivered, home-based smartphone program and an in-person, community-based program.

Specific Aim 2: To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the Otago Exercise Program delivered through both smartphone-based and in-person formats.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Thirty eligible participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrollment. In accordance with the World Guidelines for Falls Prevention, participants will be stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Following the first visit assessment, older adults classified as intermediate or high risk will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups: (1) a remotely delivered, smartphone- based Otago Exercise Program, or (2) an in-person, community-based Otago Exercise Program.

Participants in both groups will receive individualized 60-minute training sessions, two times per week for eight weeks. Across the sixteen training sessions, participants will receive a progressive balance, mobility, and strengthening program following the structure of the Otago Exercise Program.

Prior to and immediately following the exercise program, participants are asked to complete several surveys and evaluations, including: demographics, STEADI-12, SF-36, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), Four-Square Stepping Test, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Ten-meter Walk Test, Four-Stage Balance Test, 30-second chair stand, and the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA). All outcome measures will be collected at baseline and at the end of the intervention, with testers blinded to participant group allocation, and trainers blinded to baseline outcomes. In addition, gait speed will be assessed weekly using smartphone-based measurements.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Binghamton, New York, United States, 13902
        • Recruiting
        • Binghamton University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-dwelling older adults 55 years of age or older
  • Communicate in English
  • Able to ambulate at least 10 meters with or without an assistive device.
  • Cognitively intact based on scoring 18/22 or greater on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)-Blind during a phone screening process
  • Have access to an Android or iOS smartphone
  • Intermediate or high risk of falling, based on World Guidelines for Falls Prevention (Montero-Odasso et al, 2022)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lower limb amputation
  • Visual impairment uncorrectable with lenses
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, neurological or musculoskeletal impairment
  • Persistent symptoms of dizziness or lightheadedness
  • Spine or lower-extremity surgery in the past 12 months
  • Self-reported pain of >7 on a scale of 0-10

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Smartphone In-home Delivery
In-home 8-week OTAGO program
Participants in the smartphone-based group will receive Otago Exercise Program instructions delivered through Improve, an investigator-developed application. This application, installed on each participant's iOS or Android smartphone, will allow participants to track their exercises and review workout instructions. Participants in the smartphone-based group will be contacted weekly by phone to ensure safety and adherence and to assist with troubleshooting any technology-related issues. All participants will be instructed to maintain their usual activity patterns and to refrain from initiating any new structured physical activity programs during the 8-week study period. Participants will be directed by Doctor of Physical Therapy students under the supervision of a licensed Physical Therapist, with weekly phone check-ins.
Other Names:
  • Otago
Active Comparator: Group In-Person Delivery
In-Person 8-week Group OTAGO Program
Participants in the in-person, community-based group will complete the individualized Otago Exercise Program in a group setting at the Johnson City Senior Center, under the guidance of Doctor of Physical Therapy students (4) and supervision of licensed Physical Therapists.
Other Names:
  • Otago

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait Velocity
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Self-selected walking speed (m/s) over level surface
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Injurious Falls
Time Frame: Up to 1-year post intervention
Self-reported falls that lead to injury requiring clinical evaluation
Up to 1-year post intervention
PPA-Short Form: Postural Sway
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Sway Area (units: mm^2) while standing quietly for 30 seconds
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
PPA-Short Form: Finger Reaction Time
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Simple reaction time (units: msec)
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
PPA-Short Form: Knee Extensor Strength
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Maximum isometric knee extensor force (kg)
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
PPA-Short Form: Visual Contrast Sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Melbourne Contrast Sensitivity (db), on a scale of 0-24
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
PPA-Short Form: Proprioception
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Degrees offset in foot positioning
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
30-second Chair Stand
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Number of chair rises in 30-seconds
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
TUG
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Timed up and go test. Rise from a chair, walk 3-meters, turn, and return walk, and sit back down at self-selected speed
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Four-Stage Balance
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Total time to stand in side-to-side, semi-tandem, tandem, one-leg stance.
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Smartphone-based assessments
Time Frame: Weekly during 8-week training program
Self-evaluated walking speed as performed by participants at home
Weekly during 8-week training program

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Four square step test
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Time to complete a clockwise and counterclockwise stepping into four quadrants
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Frailty
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Physical Frailty Phenotype, reported on a scale of 0-5. A higher score indicates increased frailty.
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Self-reported Assessment: Enjoyment
Time Frame: At study completion, or on average 1 week post-training
Participant report of enjoyment, usability, and feasibility of the exercise program (1-5 scale), where higher scores indicate increased self-report.
At study completion, or on average 1 week post-training
SF-36
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Short-form health survey to evaluate participant self-reported health quality of life.
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
STEADI
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)
Self-report (0 to 14-point scale), where increased scores indicate increased fall risk.
Baseline (Day 0) and 1 week post-training (9 weeks later)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

No identifying information will be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fall

Clinical Trials on Smartphone-Based Intervention

Subscribe