COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF MANUAL SINGLE HEADED AND TRIPLE HEADED TOOTHBRUSHES IN REMOVING DENTAL PLAQUE AND USER EXPERIENCE

February 24, 2026 updated by: Maria Moin, Dow University of Health Sciences

COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF MANUAL AND ELECTRIC TOOTHBRUSHES IN REMOVING DENTAL PLAQUE AND USER EXPERIENCE

Background: Poor oral hygiene can be the result of negligence or because people cannot take care of their own oral hygiene due to limited dexterity. Dental plaque results in dental decay and periodontal disease over time. The importance of good oral hygiene can not be underestimated, not only for maintaining good oral health but also for maintaining general health. The most widespread means of controlling plaque at home is the toothbrush. Toothbrushes are designed in a way so as to remove plaque more efficiently.

Objective: To compare the efficiency of different toothbrushes in removing dental plaque Methodology: This Randomized control study will be carried out at Different schools in Karachi, Pakistan. The duration of this study will be 6 months. In this study, the participants will be recruited using a simple random sampling method. A minimum sample size of 20 was chosen. The participants in this study were invited and included based on the following criteria: Age group 15-50 years. Both males and females. Individuals with no active dental or systemic diseases. Consenting participants or guardians providing consent for minors. The participants were excluded based on non-consenting individuals or guardians. Those with active oral infections or systemic conditions affecting oral health. Participants with a recent professional dental cleaning (within 3 months). Use of orthodontic appliances or prosthetics that may interfere with toothbrushing performance.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Karachi, Pakistan, 77440
        • Bahira University Dental College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Accept healthy individuals
  2. Age group 21-25 years.
  3. Both males and females.
  4. Individuals with no active dental or systemic diseases.
  5. Consenting participants or guardians providing consent for minors

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Non-consenting individuals or guardians.

    2. Those with active oral infections or systemic conditions affecting oral health.

    3. Participants with a recent professional dental cleaning (within 3 months).

    4. Use of orthodontic appliances or prosthetics that may interfere with toothbrushing performance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: single headed brush
manual sigle headed toothbrush
Experimental: triple headed brush
triple -headed manual toothbrush for adults

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
decrease in dental plaque and gingival scores
Time Frame: 1 month
Scores reduction from pre to post. Mean plaque scores of between 0.1 - 0.5 will be considered normal, and the more the scores indicatea worst case
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
decrease in gingival scores
Time Frame: 1 month
Scores reduction from pre to post, the more the scores, the worst is the case, 0.1-0.5 mean gingival scores will be considered normal
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Dow UHS2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Disease

Clinical Trials on manual single headed toothbrush

Subscribe