Comparison of Post-Dural Puncture Headache After Spinal Anesthesia Using Median Versus Paramedian Approach

February 22, 2026 updated by: Adeel Ahmed, Mayo Hospital Lahore

Comparison of Post-Dural Puncture Headache After Spinal Anesthesia Using Median Versus Paramedian Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial will compare two commonly used techniques for performing spinal anesthesia, the median (midline) approach and the paramedian (lateral) approach, in adult patients undergoing elective orthopedic or urology surgery at Mayo Hospital, Lahore. Spinal anesthesia is widely used because it provides rapid pain control during surgery and avoids airway instrumentation. However, a recognized complication is post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), a headache that typically worsens on sitting or standing and improves on lying down. PDPH can delay mobilization, reduce oral intake, prolong hospital stay, and sometimes require additional treatment.

Eligible participants aged 18 to 65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II will be enrolled, and then allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive spinal anesthesia using either the median or paramedian approach. To standardize the procedure, spinal anesthesia will be performed under aseptic technique at the L3 to L4 or L4 to L5 interspace using a 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle, followed by injection of a fixed dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine. Routine perioperative monitoring will be applied for all participants, and intra-operative blood pressure will be recorded at regular intervals to document hypotension.

The primary outcomes are the frequency and severity of PDPH. PDPH will be assessed using a structured checklist based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) at 24 hours, 72 hours, and day 5 after the procedure by a trained assessor. Headache intensity will be recorded using a 0 to 10 Visual Analogue Scale, and categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. The hypothesis is that the frequency and severity of PDPH differ between the median and paramedian approaches in patients receiving spinal anesthesia for orthopedic or urology surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

142

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 54000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both gender (male and female) aged between 18 and 65.
  • Adults undergoing elective orthopedics or urology procedures planned under spinal anesthesia.
  • ASA status I or II.
  • Ability to give informed consent and comply with postoperative assessment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication to spinal anesthesia, including infection at puncture site, coagulopathy or therapeutic anticoagulation, thrombocytopenia, severe hypovolemia or shock, raised intracranial pressure due to space occupying lesion, or suspected spinal canal infection.
  • Known hypersensitivity to planned intrathecal local anesthetic or adjuvant drugs.
  • History of chronic daily headache, migraine requiring regular prophylaxis, or headache at baseline on the day of surgery.
  • Prior lumbar spine surgery, significant spinal deformity, or neurological disease affecting lower limb sensation that will interfere with neuraxial assessment.
  • Inability to complete follow-up assessments due to impaired cognition, severe psychiatric illness, or major communication barrier.
  • Emergency procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A (Median Approach)
Participants will receive spinal anesthesia using the median (midline) approach for elective orthopedic or urology surgery. The spinal needle will be introduced in the midline through the interspinous space until free cerebrospinal fluid flow is obtained, followed by intrathecal injection of a fixed dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine.
Spinal anesthesia will be performed under aseptic technique at L3 to L4 or L4 to L5 using a 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle. After local infiltration with lignocaine 1% (2 mL), and confirmation of free cerebrospinal fluid flow, hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% (15 mg, 2 mL) will be injected intrathecally. Standard perioperative monitoring and postoperative care will be applied.
Active Comparator: Group B (Paramedian Approach)
Participants will receive spinal anesthesia using the paramedian approach for elective orthopedic or urology surgery. The needle entry point will be approximately 1 cm lateral and 1 cm caudal to the inferior border of the selected spinous process, directed medially and cephalad to access the subarachnoid space, followed by intrathecal injection of a fixed dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine.
Spinal anesthesia will be performed under aseptic technique at L3 to L4 or L4 to L5 using a 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle. After local infiltration with lignocaine 1% (2 mL), the needle will be inserted via the paramedian route (approximately 1 cm lateral and 1 cm caudal to the inferior border of the selected spinous process) and directed medially and cephalad. After confirmation of free cerebrospinal fluid flow, hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% (15 mg, 2 mL) will be injected intrathecally. Standard perioperative monitoring and postoperative care will be applied.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of post-dural puncture headache
Time Frame: 24 hours, 72 hours, and day 5 after spinal anesthesia
Proportion of participants developing post-dural puncture headache, defined as a headache occurring within 5 days after spinal anesthesia that worsens within 15 minutes of sitting or standing and improves within 15 minutes of lying down, with at least one associated feature (neck stiffness, tinnitus, hypoacusis, photophobia, or nausea). Diagnosis will be confirmed using a structured checklist based on International Headache Society International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition criteria.
24 hours, 72 hours, and day 5 after spinal anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of post-dural puncture headache
Time Frame: 24 hours, 72 hours, and day 5 after spinal anesthesia
Headache intensity measured using a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (0 to 10), recorded at each scheduled assessment. Severity will be categorized as mild (1 to 3), moderate (4 to 6), or severe (7 to 10).
24 hours, 72 hours, and day 5 after spinal anesthesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ali Raza Ihsan, Mayo Hospital Lahore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-Dural Puncture Headache

Clinical Trials on Spinal anesthesia using median approach (midline)

Subscribe