From FAST to FAST BEE - Video-Based Stroke Mnemonic Pilot (FAST BEE)

April 2, 2026 updated by: Siju V Abraham, MD, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute

A Questionnaire-Based Evaluation of Knowledge Recall, Application, and Action Awareness After Viewing the FAST BEE Stroke Education Video

This online study evaluates immediate learning outcomes after viewing a short animated FAST BEE stroke-education video (1 minute 51 seconds). After providing electronic consent (and for adolescents aged 13-17 years, parental/guardian consent plus participant assent), participants will watch the video and complete a brief online questionnaire.

The questionnaire assesses (1) recall of FAST BEE elements, (2) ability to apply FAST BEE to a stroke scenario involving balance and double vision, and (3) intention to take emergency action (calling emergency services).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Traditional stroke-recognition campaigns commonly teach the FAST mnemonic (Face, Arm, Speech, Time to call emergency services). While FAST captures frequent stroke presentations, it may not highlight symptoms that can occur in posterior circulation strokes, such as sudden imbalance (ataxia/vertigo) or visual disturbance (blurred vision/double vision). The FAST BEE mnemonic (Face, Arm, Speech, Time, Balance, Eyes, Emergency) was developed by the World Stroke Organization Prehospital Care Task Force to address this gap by adding Balance and Eyes checks and reinforcing emergency action.

This study is an educational, minimal-risk evaluation using an ultra-brief (1 minute 51 seconds) animated FAST BEE video embedded in an online survey to standardise exposure and assess immediate learning outcomes. The study is conducted via institutional Google Forms as an online-only activity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

318

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kerala
      • Thrissur, Kerala, India
        • Jubilee Mission Medical Collage & Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults (aged ≥18)who are able to give consent.

Ability to view and understand the video (in English) and complete the online

Minors (<18 years, >13 years) only if accompanied by documented parental/guardian consent and child assent, in accordance with ICMR guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria:

Declines participation or exits before completing the survey.

Duplicate or blank submissions: responses with identical timestamps/data or >50% missing primary endpoint items will be removed.

For minors: lack of parental consent or child assent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FAST BEE Video Educational Intervention
Participants complete electronic informed consent, view a 1 minute 51 second FAST BEE animated educational video (Face, Arm, Speech, Time, Balance, Eyes, Emergency), and immediately complete a structured online questionnaire assessing recall, scenario application, and action awareness (6-8 minutes total). The study is conducted online via institutional Google Form.
A 1 minute 51 second animated educational video introducing the FAST BEE mnemonic (Face, Arm, Speech, Time, Balance, Eyes, Emergency). The video depicts stroke scenarios including balance problems and double vision and emphasises calling emergency services (112) at "Time" and again at the end. The video is embedded within a Google Form (online-only) for standardised exposure. Immediately after viewing, participants complete a questionnaire assessing recall, scenario application, and action awareness.
Other Names:
  • FAST BEE animated video
  • FAST BEE questionnaire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recall Score (Q1)
Time Frame: Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Number of mnemonic elements correctly recalled (0-7 points: F, A, S, T, B, E (eyes), E (emergency)).
Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Action Awareness (Q3/Q5b)
Time Frame: Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Likert score (1-5) on intent to call 112; we take the higher of two related items (Q3: "likelihood to call," Q5b: "usefulness for action").
Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Composite Endpoint - Usefulness Index (0-100%)
Time Frame: Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)

A weighted score combining recall, scenario, and action awareness (higher indicates better performance).

Calculation: 40%(Q1/7) + 30%(Q2/2) + 30%*(max(Q3,Q5b)/5). Interpretation (pilot): Mean ≥70% suggests good mnemonic retention/action; 50-69% mixed results; <50% poor retention/application.

Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Scenario Application (Q2)
Time Frame: Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Score 1 point each for recognizing balance/diplopia as stroke signs and mentioning emergency action. Score range; 0-2
Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived Usefulness of FAST BEE
Time Frame: Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Participants' perceived usefulness of FAST BEE for recognising stroke signs (Q5a) and for remembering to act (Q5b), compared amongst different demographic subgroups.
Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Memorability Comparison: FAST BEE versus BE FAST
Time Frame: Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Comparison of participants' perceived memorability of FAST BEE versus the standard BE FAST mnemonic (Q4), analysed amongst different demographic subgroups.
Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Qualitative Feedback on FAST BEE
Time Frame: Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)
Free-text qualitative feedback on FAST BEE (clarity, suggestions) to refine the mnemonic and video for public and school settings.
Immediately after video viewing (same sitting)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Subscribe