Evaluation of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Learning and Self-management Programme (FILIP) (FILIP)

Self-efficacy and Well-being of Patients With Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease - an Observational Study

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a newly developed digital education and self-management program for people with fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (FILD) during inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation and outpatient interstitial lung disease (ILD) care. The study also explores whether participation in the program is associated with changes in health-related outcomes.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  • Is the digital education and self-management program acceptable, useful, and practical for patients with FILD?
  • Is it feasible to recruit and retain patients and to collect outcome data for a future larger effectiveness study?
  • Do patients who participate in the program show differences in health-related outcomes compared with patients treated before the program was implemented?

Patients who consent to participate during the implementation phase will be offered access to the digital education and self-management program. Their outcomes will be compared with those of a historical cohort of patients who received usual care before the program was introduced.

Participants will:

  • Use a web-based digital education and self-management program with multiple e-learning modules tailored to individual needs and preferences
  • Access the program via smartphone, tablet, or computer during inpatient rehabilitation or outpatient care
  • Discuss questions related to the program content with healthcare professionals during routine rehabilitation sessions or clinic visits
  • Complete questionnaires about their experience with the program and their health-related outcomes

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (FILD) are a group of rare and chronic lung conditions that are often associated with persistent symptoms, reduced quality of life, and limitations in daily activities. People living with FILD frequently report unmet needs regarding disease-specific education and support for self-management. In particular, patients identify a lack of clear, understandable, and patient-centered educational resources as a major gap in current inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient interstitial lung disease (ILD) care.

To address this need, a blended digital education and self-management program was developed for patients with FILD. The program combines web-based e-learning modules with opportunities for discussion and clarification with healthcare professionals during routine inpatient rehabilitation or outpatient clinical care. The digital content addresses core and optional topics related to disease understanding, symptom management, and self-management strategies. Suggested modules are based on individual patient needs and preferences identified through initial questions within the digital platform, while all modules remain accessible to all users.

This study is an exploratory, multicenter, before-after observational cohort study with an embedded feasibility sub-study. Two cohorts are included: a historical control cohort consisting of patients treated before implementation of the digital program, and a feasibility cohort consisting of patients treated after implementation who consent to participate and receive access to the digital education and self-management program. Participants are not randomized, and investigators do not assign patients to intervention or control groups. Exposure to the program is determined by timing of implementation and patient consent.

The primary objective of the feasibility sub-study is to assess intervention feasibility, including acceptability, perceived usefulness, patient satisfaction, and adherence to the digital program. Adherence is assessed by documenting participation in and completion of the educational modules. Semi-structured interviews with patients and healthcare professionals are conducted to explore barriers and facilitators to implementation in inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient care settings.

Secondary objectives address study feasibility for a future larger effectiveness trial. These objectives include evaluating the feasibility of recruiting the targeted number of participants, retaining participants through follow-up assessments, and collecting health-related outcome data with minimal missing data.

Health-related outcomes are collected to explore patients' responsiveness to the digital education and self-management program and to inform the design of a future effectiveness trial. The primary health-related outcome is self-efficacy, assessed at multiple time points using a pulmonary rehabilitation-adapted self-efficacy measure. Secondary health-related outcomes include health-related quality of life, assessed using a disease-specific questionnaire for interstitial lung disease, as well as changes in self-efficacy at earlier follow-up time points.

Additional exploratory outcomes include functional exercise capacity derived from routinely collected clinical data, patient-reported symptoms and health status using visual analog scales, patient-reported respiratory symptoms, psychological well-being, and supplemental oxygen requirements during activity. These outcomes are collected to provide a comprehensive picture of patient experiences and to evaluate the feasibility and relevance of these measures for future studies.

The digital education and self-management program is delivered through a web-based learning management system and can be accessed via smartphone, tablet, or desktop computer. For inpatient rehabilitation patients, access is provided during the rehabilitation stay, with flexible use throughout the program and support from therapists as needed. Topics from the digital program can be discussed during routine therapy sessions, and patients retain access to the digital resources after discharge. For outpatient care patients, access is provided during an ILD clinic visit, with opportunities to discuss program content during follow-up appointments and reminders to encourage engagement.

Overall, this study aims to generate essential information on the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a digital education and self-management program for patients with FILD, while providing preliminary data on relevant health-related outcomes to support planning of a future multicenter effectiveness trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department for Pulmonary Medicine, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
        • Contact:
      • Heiligenschwendi, Switzerland, 3625
        • Recruiting
        • Center for Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Inselspital and Berner Reha Zentrum, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria are:

  • Diagnosis of a FILD as major indication for pulmonary rehabilitation (for Berner Reha Zentrum only)
  • Enrolled in Idiopathic interstitial Pneumonia (IIP) cohort study (Nr. 246/15 / PB_2016-01524) and agreed to further use of data for further research purpose (for Inselspital only)
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria are:

  • Cognitive inability or insufficient knowledge of project language (German) to follow informed consent or study procedures
  • Sarcoidosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
This arm includes patients with fibrotic interstitial lung diseases enrolled in the observational study during the feasibility phase. Participants who consent to participate are offered access to a blended digital education and self-management program in addition to usual inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation or outpatient ILD care.

The program consists of multiple web-based e-learning modules covering core and optional topics relevant to lung fibrosis. Modules are suggested based on individual symptoms and self-management needs, but all content is accessible to all users. The program can be accessed via smartphone, tablet, or computer using a web link. It is intended solely for education and well-being support and is not used for diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, or prognosis of disease.

In inpatient rehabilitation, patients may use the program flexibly during their stay, with support from therapists as needed, and can discuss content during routine therapy sessions. In outpatient care, patients receive access during an ILD clinic visit and can discuss content during follow-up appointments, supported by reminders to encourage use.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention feasibility outcomes - Acceptance
Time Frame: 3-6 months follow-up
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM): 4-item questioniare measuring the acceptability of an intervention on a 5-likert scale (completely disagree to completely agree).
3-6 months follow-up
Intervention feasibility outcomes - Appropriateness
Time Frame: 3-6 months follow-up
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM): 4-item questioniare measuring the appropriation of an intervention on a 5-likert scale (completely disagree to completely agree).
3-6 months follow-up
Intervention feasibility outcomes - Feasibiilty
Time Frame: 3-6 months follow-up
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM): 4-item questioniare measuring the acceptability of an intervention on a f-likert scale (completely disagree to completely agree).
3-6 months follow-up
Intervention feasibility outcomes - Compliance
Time Frame: 3-6 months follow-up
percent of attended/performed educational modules.
3-6 months follow-up
Intervention feasibility outcomes - Farriers and facilitators
Time Frame: 3-6 months follow-up
Consecutive semi-structured patient and staff interviews will be performed until data saturation to explore barriers and facilitators for implementation.
3-6 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Study feasibility outcomes - Recruitment success
Time Frame: 3-6 months
Recruitment success: Time to assess the targeted the 50 patients for the feasibility study.
3-6 months
Study feasibility outcomes - Retention
Time Frame: 3-6 months
Number of recruited patients that successfully completed the study (pre- and post-assessment)
3-6 months
Study feasibility outcomes - Data collection:
Time Frame: 3-6 months
Percentage of missing data in outcome assessments.
3-6 months
Health related outcomes - self efficacy
Time Frame: 3- 6 months follow-up
Change in self-efficacy from t0 to t1 and t2, assessed with the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy
3- 6 months follow-up
Health related outcomes - HRQoL
Time Frame: 3- 6 months follow-up
Change in HRQOL from t0 to t1 and t2 assessed by the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease health status questionnaire
3- 6 months follow-up
Health related outcomes - functional status
Time Frame: from start to end of inpatient rehabilitation
functional status assessed by six-minute walking test (routinely collected data)
from start to end of inpatient rehabilitation
Health related outcomes - self-reported health status (VAS)
Time Frame: 3- 6 months follow-up
3- 6 months follow-up
Health related outcomes - Anxiety and Depression Score
Time Frame: 3- 6 months follow-up
Self-reported anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
3- 6 months follow-up
Health related outcomes - oxygen supplementation
Time Frame: 3- 6 months follow-up
Supplemental oxygen needs for activity and at rest (routinely collected data)
3- 6 months follow-up
Health related outcomes - Re-hospitalization
Time Frame: 3- 6 months follow-up
re-hospitalization (y/n)
3- 6 months follow-up
Health related outcomes - survival
Time Frame: 3- 6 months follow-up
survival (y/n)
3- 6 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thimo Marcin, PHD, Center for Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Inselspital and Berner Reha Zentrum, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
  • Principal Investigator: Sabina Guler, MD, Department for Pulmonary Medicine, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual patient data for patients who signed the additional informed consent for further use of data may be shared upon request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Fibrosis Interstitial

Clinical Trials on Blended patient education and self-management programme

Subscribe