- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07461259
Safety and Feasibility of TWIICE Rise - Phase 2
Two-phase Pilot Study on the Safety and Feasibility of TWIICE Rise for Exoskeleton-assisted Ambulation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
The aim of this study is to assess the safety and the feasibility of two versions of TWIICE Rise for exoskeleton-assisted ambulation in patients with a spinal cord injury.
This study is done in two phases:
The first phase evaluates the safety and feasibility of TWIICE Rise 0.0 with 5 patients over 6 sessions in clinic. The second phase is being conducted with TWIICE Rise 1.0. This version has potentially improved functionalities based on feedback from Phase 1. Safety and feasibility will be assessed with 10 patients over 10 sessions in different settings (clinic, home, and community environment).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim of this clinical trial is to assess the safety and the feasibility of two versions of TWIICE Rise for exoskeleton assisted ambulation in patients with a spinal cord injury. The study is thus done in two phases.
The first phase evaluates the safety and feasibility of TWIICE Rise 0.0 with five patients over 6 sessions in clinic. This phase allows the manufacturer to collect data that can be used to improve the device design if necessary.
The second phase of the study is being conducted with TWIICE Rise 1.0. Safety and feasibility will be assessed with 10 patients over 10 sessions in different settings (clinic, home, and community environment) to test the device intended use. The first sessions are done at the rehabilitation specialized center to benefit from the clinical settings to learn to walk with the exoskeleton. Once the patients reach sufficient ambulatory skills determined by the Mobility SkillsTests, the following sessions can be done at home and community settings.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Mario Widmer, PhD
- Phone Number: +41 41 939 51 97
- Email: mario.widmer@paraplegie.ch
Study Locations
-
-
Canton of Lucerne
-
Nottwil, Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland, 6207
- Recruiting
- Swiss Paraplegic Centre Nottwil
-
Contact:
- Mario Widmer, PhD
- Phone Number: +41 41 939 51 97
- Email: mario.widmer@paraplegie.ch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed Consent signed by the subject.
- Traumatic and non-traumatic SCI
- Motor incomplete SCI with Neurological Level of Injury (NLI) C5-L5, or Motor Complete SCI with NLI T1-L5 as determined by the ISNCSCI.
- Male and non-pregnant, non-lactating female aged 18 to 70 years old
- At least 6 months after injury
- Able to stand or maintain upright position with a standing device (e.g., 'Easy stand') for at least ten minutes without clinical symptoms of orthostatic hypotension.
- Able to use crutches.
- Able to sit with knees and hips >= 90° flexion
- Phase 1: Height of 160 to 180 cm, Phase 2: Height of 160 to 190 cm
- Phase 1: Weight of <80 kg, Phase 2: Weight of <100 kg
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of severe neurological injuries other than spinal cord injury (e.g., Multiple Sclerosis, Cerebral Palsy, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Traumatic Brain Injury, Stroke)
- Ability to walk 10 meters without physical assistance of a person
- Severe concurrent medical disease, illness, or condition
- Systemic or peripheral infection influencing wearing an exoskeleton.
- Diagnosis of coronary artery disease that precludes moderate to intense exercise.
- A medical diagnosis in the patient chart of atherosclerosis, congestive heart failure, or history of myocardial infarction
- Individuals with a pacemaker, defibrillator, drug delivery pump, or other electrical devices if malfunctions could lead to serious adverse events.
- Deep vein thromboses in lower extremities of less than 6 months duration.
- Untreated sever hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure >120 mmHg)
- Unstable spine or unhealed limbs
- History of lower extremities or pelvic fragility fractures within the last two years
- Heterotopic ossification that impairs joint mobility
- Significant contractures defined as flexion contracture limited to 20 the hip and knee.
- Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth grade 4) or uncontrolled clonus
- Diagnosis of severe osteoporosis/penia: Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) results indicating a t-score below -3.5 at the femoral neck or the total proximal femur bone, and knee bone mineral density (BMD) < 0.60 gm/cm2
- Current pressure ulcer of the arms, trunk, pelvic area, or lower extremities
- Psychiatric or cognitive conditions that may interfere with the trial.
- Pregnancy or women who plan to become pregnant during the study period, and lactating women.
- Patient is currently involved in any other interventional study.
- Other severe illness that the study physician considers in his/her clinical judgment to be exclusionary.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exoskeleton assisted ambulation
Phase 1: Five participants will undergo a training programme with the TWIICE Rise 0.0 two times a week for up to 6 weeks for a total of 6 sessions. Phase 2: Ten participants will undergo a training programme with the TWIICE Rise 1.0 2-3 times a week for up to 10 weeks for a total of 10 sessions. |
TWIICE Rise is a lower-limb overground robotic exoskeleton intended for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). TWIICE Rise is intended to perform ambulatory functions in rehabilitation institutions, home, or community environment under the supervision of a specially trained coach. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of (serious) adverse device effects [Safety]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
This outcome is commonly used in healthcare for the measurement of patient safety.
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Incidence of device deficiencies [Safety]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
Device deficiencies will be assessed according to ISO 14155 (any inadequacy of a medical device with respect to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety, or performance).
All device deficiencies will be prospectively recorded by study personnel in the Case Report Form at each device-use session and via interim reports throughout the 10-week intervention.
Incidence is defined as the number of new device deficiencies occurring during the study period per participant and per device-use session
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of (serious) adverse events [Safety]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
This outcome is commonly used in healthcare for the measurement of patient safety.
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Heart rate (pre-training, when standing, and post-training) [Safety]
Time Frame: First four session of each participant at three standardized time points: (1) 1 minute before standing, (2) after 1 minute of supported standing in the device (3) within 1 minute after completion of the training session (post-training)
|
Heart rate (beats per minute) will be measured using a wearable heart-rate monitor
|
First four session of each participant at three standardized time points: (1) 1 minute before standing, (2) after 1 minute of supported standing in the device (3) within 1 minute after completion of the training session (post-training)
|
|
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (pre-training, when standing, and post-training) [Safety]
Time Frame: First four session of each participant at three standardized time points: (1) 1 minute before standing, (2) after 1 minute of supported standing in the device (3) within 1 minute after completion of the training session (post-training)
|
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) will be measured using an automated upper-arm blood pressure monitor
|
First four session of each participant at three standardized time points: (1) 1 minute before standing, (2) after 1 minute of supported standing in the device (3) within 1 minute after completion of the training session (post-training)
|
|
Pain rating and location [Safety]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
Used to assess whether training with TWIICE Rise does not cause or exacerbate pain. Pain intensity and location are assessed at the beginning of each session. Pain intensity is evaluated using the Pain Numeric Rating Scale that is a unidimensional measure of pain in adult. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). |
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Fatigue rating [Safety]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
Used as a measure of exertion due to training with TWIICE Rise.
Fatigue is assessed pre-training and post training.
The Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale is a patient-administered, single-item, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing 'no fatigue' and 10 representing 'as bad as you can imagine'.
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Skin status rating [Safety]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
Used to assess whether the device's interfaces cause skin lesions.
Skin status is rated on a 0 to 4 pressure ulcer scale, 0 representing 'no skin injury' and '4' representing 'very deep wound'.
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Number of steps recorded by exoskeleton per training session [Feasibility]
Time Frame: Each training session from first session through end of intervention (10 weeks)
|
Step count (number of steps) will be automatically recorded by the TWIICE Rise exoskeleton system log during each training session.
Steps per session will be summarized across sessions to characterize feasibility and extent of device-assisted walking activity during training.
|
Each training session from first session through end of intervention (10 weeks)
|
|
Training location [Feasibility, phase 2 only]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
Used to evaluate the feasibility of using the device in different environments such clinics, home and community settings and the number of sessions in each condition
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Type of suface walked on [Feasibility]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
This indicated the feasibility of walking on different type of terrain.
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
6-Meter Walk Test (6MWT) + Level of Assistance [Feasibility]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
The distance walked with the powered exoskeleton during the 6MWT.
The 6MWT is the primary assessment used to determine the progression of walking skills in exoskeletons.
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) + Level of Assistance [Feasibility]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
The 10MWT is the best effort time (seconds) it takes the participant to walk a 10 m distance and is recorded while the person performs the 6MWT.
This allows assessing the walking speed.
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Time Up and Go (TUG) + Level of Assistance [Feasibility]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
The TUG test measures the time it takes the participant to stand up from a seated position, walk three meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down again.
The TUG test represents the person s ability to use the exoskeletal system since it incorporates multiple aspects of mobility in the device.
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Donning and doffing time + Level of Assistance [Feasibility]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
Used to evaluate the time needed to install the user inside the device (donning) and back to the wheelchair (doffing).
It assesses the feasibility and usability of a device, as the setup time is usually a determining factor for assisting devices.
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Mobility skills test + Level of Assistance [Feasibility]
Time Frame: up to 16 weeks
|
Used to assess the feasibility of the mobility tasks intended with TWIICE Rise.
Mobility skills such as standing, walking on different type of ground, and step on a stair are measured separately of each other in an ascending order of difficulty, until two skills cannot be achieved without moderate or maximal assistance.
|
up to 16 weeks
|
|
Slope inclination
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
Used to mesure the slope inclination on which the participants walked
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Walking speed recorded by exoskeleton during training sessions [Feasibility]
Time Frame: Each training session from first session through end of intervention (10 weeks)
|
Walking speed (meters/second) will be automatically recorded by the TWIICE Rise exoskeleton system log during each training session.
Mean and peak walking speed per session will be summarized across sessions to characterize feasibility and locomotor performance during device-assisted training.
|
Each training session from first session through end of intervention (10 weeks)
|
|
Time spent in exoskeleton activity modes per training session [Feasibility]
Time Frame: Each training session from first session through end of intervention (10 weeks)
|
Time (minutes) spent in each exoskeleton operating mode (e.g., sitting, standing, walking) will be automatically recorded by the TWIICE Rise exoskeleton system log during each training session.
Duration in each mode and total active training time per session will be summarized across sessions to characterize feasibility and patterns of device use during training.
|
Each training session from first session through end of intervention (10 weeks)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) [Satisfaction]
Time Frame: up to 16 weeks
|
Used to measure user satisfaction from participants and therapists.
The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) is designed to measure the level of satisfaction and the value people attribute to assistive technologies.
It does so using 12 variables which are scored on a 5 point scale in terms of perceived importance and satisfaction.
While items 1-8 rate the satisfaction with the device, items 9-12 are for assessing the satisfaction with the service.
If the users are not very satisfied with a feature, they are asked to provide specific feedback.
The final score is the mean sum scores of all valid responses with a range of 1 (not satisfied at all) to 5 (very satisfied).
|
up to 16 weeks
|
|
Open-ended questionnaire [Satisfaction]
Time Frame: up to 16 weeks
|
Used to study design modifications requested by users and clinicians.
|
up to 16 weeks
|
|
Subjective health-related questionnaire [General Health]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
4-item questionnaire to assess potential health-related changes due to regular exoskeleton-assisted ambulation, with a 5-point Likert-scale (1 = 'strongly disagree' and 5 = 'strongly agree').
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
|
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scales [General Health]
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scales (PIADS) is a 26-item (7-point Likert-Scale), self-report questionnaire designed to assess the effects of an assistive device on functional independence, well-being, and quality of life.
It is divided into three subscales: Competence, adaptability and self-esteem.
For each of the subscales, typically means are calculated that range from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact).
To have only positive sum scores, the range of the individual scores are shifted to 1 to 7, meaning that sum scores range from 1 *26 (26, maximum negative impact) to 7 *26 (182, maximum positive impact).
The PIADS is a responsive measure and sensitive to important variables such as the user's clinical condition, device stigma, and functional features of the device.
It has been shown to accurately reflect the self-described experiences of people who use assistive devices.
|
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 10 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- TWIICE-2021-15-P2
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruitingInjury, Spinal Cord
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Khon Kaen UniversityUnknownInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Institut GuttmannNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Disease | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Traumatic Spinal Cord InjuriesSpain
-
InVivo TherapeuticsTerminated
-
Ekso BionicsBurke Medical Research InstituteCompletedInjuries, Spinal CordUnited States
-
ReWalk Robotics, Inc.Unknown
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNot yet recruitingSpine Injury | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury | Cord Injury, Spinal | Cord Infarction Spinal
-
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GACompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
Clinical Trials on TWIICE Rise
-
TWIICESwiss Paraplegic Centre NottwilRecruiting
-
Loyola UniversityCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Hypertension | Obesity | Diabetes | Atherosclerosis | Stress | DyslipidemiasUnited States
-
Loyola UniversityColumbia UniversityRecruitingInflammation | Stress | RacismUnited States
-
RISE CollaborativeVentura County APS; Harris County APS; Cuyahoga County APS; ONEgeneration; Harris... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingElder Abuse | Self-NeglectUnited States
-
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolCompletedBreast Cancer | Gynecologic CancerSingapore
-
University of HoustonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsRecruitingDyslexia | Learning DisordersUnited States
-
University of WashingtonCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedConcussion, MildUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedStress, Psychological | HIV-1-infection | ResilienceUnited States
-
National University of SingaporeCompletedAdaptation, Psychological | Resilience, PsychologicalHong Kong