- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07466446
Post Intensive Care Accelerometery to Study and Support Recovery Outcomes (PICASSO)
The primary purpose of this study is to find out whether a wrist-worn activity monitor can help healthcare professionals understand how people recover after they leave the intensive care unit (ICU), where they were cared for when they were most unwell. By tracking recovery at home, the device may help identify problems early so that the right support can be provided. The study involves adults who are discharged from the ICU in three hospitals in Edinburgh.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Can movement data from a wearable device give useful information about how people feel and function after they return home following ICU and then hospital discharge?
- Do changes in activity levels relate to changes in symptoms like pain, anxiety or behavioural measures like daily functioning, sleep and cognition? There is no comparison group in this study.
Participants will:
- Wear a wrist-worn activity monitor
- Answer a short set of health-related questionnaires
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Many people who survive a critical illness continue to face physical, emotional, and social challenges for a prolonged period afterwards. The Critical Care Recovery Service (CCRS) supports recovery across three acute hospitals in NHS Lothian, providing coordinated physical and psychological rehabilitation for ICU survivors. Within this diverse group, rehabilitation needs are graded as low or high risk using a validated screening checklist to identify patients with complex health and social care needs.
This study is designed to collect patient reported outcome data and movement data from the dominant wrist using an accelerometer among CCRS patients. Adult patients identified as being at high risk of complex rehabilitation needs are subjected for voluntary enrolment at hospital discharge. In addition to the routine CCRS follow ups, participants in our study complete a structured telephone assessment to evaluate their health related quality of life, physical capabilities, and cognitive function over the two months following discharge, complemented by continuous wrist worn accelerometry for the entire study period.
This study will provide early evidence on the feasibility and value of integrating continuous wearable monitoring with repeated patient-reported assessments during the early post-ICU period. By linking real-world activity patterns with key domains of recovery, the findings will help identify meaningful digital indicators of deterioration or unmet rehabilitation needs.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Zoeb Jiwaji, Dr
- Phone Number: 0044 (0)131 242 1186
- Email: zoeb.jiwaji@ed.ac.uk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Barat Ospanov, Dr
- Email: b.ospanov@sms.ed.ac.uk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH4 2XU
- Recruiting
- Western General Hospital
-
Contact:
- Zoeb Jiwaji, Dr
- Email: zoeb.jiwaji@ed.ac.uk
-
Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA
- Recruiting
- The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
-
Contact:
- Barat Ospanov, Dr
- Email: b.ospanov@sms.ed.ac.uk
-
Contact:
- Zoeb Jiwaji, Dr
- Email: zoeb.jiwaji@ed.ac.uk
-
Livingston, United Kingdom, EH54 6PP
- Recruiting
- St Johns Hospital
-
Contact:
- Zoeb Jiwaji, Dr
- Email: zoeb.jiwaji@ed.ac.uk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Mechanical ventilation for more than 3 days
- Total ICU length of stay greater than 7 days
- Classified as "High Risk" using a validated High-Risk Tool*
- Expected to be discharged from hospital within the next several days
Exclusion Criteria:
- Primary neurological diagnosis as the reason for ICU admission
- Identified by the clinical team as being on the palliative care pathway
- Physical activity primarily limited by the acute injury (e.g., major trauma or limb amputation)
- Unable to mobilise independently prior to the index hospitalisation requiring ICU admission due to a long-term condition and/or disability
Lack of capacity or inability to provide informed consent
- The High-Risk Tool (Walsh et al., 2022) assesses eight domains: recent hospital admissions; multimorbidity (≥4 chronic conditions); polypharmacy (≥4 regular medications); prior mental health disorder; substance misuse history; current antidepressant or antipsychotic therapy; need for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs); and living alone or fragile social circumstances. Patients meeting ≥3 domains are classified as high risk for post-ICU deterioration and readmission.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of wearable data collection
Time Frame: 2 months after hospital discharge
|
The proportion of enrolled post-ICU patients achieving successful data collection. Successful data collection is defined as:
|
2 months after hospital discharge
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Telephone Questionnaire Completion Rate
Time Frame: 2 months after hospital discharge
|
The proportion of included post-ICU patients who successfully complete the battery of follow-up assessments, including the EQ-5D-5L, PSQI, T-MoCA, and PROMIS PF-10a questionnaires at the following time-frames: Baseline (Day 0 ± 5), 2 weeks (Day 14 ± 3), 1 month (Day 28 ± 3), and 2 months (Day 56 ± 3) post-hospital discharge.
|
2 months after hospital discharge
|
|
Unplanned hospital readmission rate
Time Frame: 2 months after hospital discharge.
|
The proportion of participants experiencing at least one unplanned hospital readmission following the index discharge.
|
2 months after hospital discharge.
|
|
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 2 months after hospital discharge.
|
The proportion of participants who die from any cause following index hospital discharge.
|
2 months after hospital discharge.
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 ± 5), 2 weeks (Day 14 ± 3), 1 month (Day 28 ± 3), and 2 months (Day 56 ± 3) post-hospital discharge.
|
Assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.
This includes five domain scores (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression) ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems), and the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
|
Baseline (Day 0 ± 5), 2 weeks (Day 14 ± 3), 1 month (Day 28 ± 3), and 2 months (Day 56 ± 3) post-hospital discharge.
|
|
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 ± 5), 2 weeks (Day 14 ± 3), 1 month (Day 28 ± 3), and 2 months (Day 56 ± 3) post-hospital discharge.
|
Assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
The PSQI yields a global score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote superior sleep quality and a score > 5 indicates significant sleep disturbance.
|
Baseline (Day 0 ± 5), 2 weeks (Day 14 ± 3), 1 month (Day 28 ± 3), and 2 months (Day 56 ± 3) post-hospital discharge.
|
|
Cognitive Function
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 ± 5), 2 weeks (Day 14 ± 3), 1 month (Day 28 ± 3), and 2 months (Day 56 ± 3) post-hospital discharge.
|
Assessed using the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA).
Total scores range from 0 to 22, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance.
|
Baseline (Day 0 ± 5), 2 weeks (Day 14 ± 3), 1 month (Day 28 ± 3), and 2 months (Day 56 ± 3) post-hospital discharge.
|
|
Physical Function
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 ± 5), 2 weeks (Day 14 ± 3), 1 month (Day 28 ± 3), and 2 months (Day 56 ± 3) post-hospital discharge.
|
Assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function short form (PF-10a).
The PF-10a is scored by summing raw scores from 10 items (rated 1-5), which are converted into a standardized T-score using conversion tables, where higher scores indicate better physical function.
|
Baseline (Day 0 ± 5), 2 weeks (Day 14 ± 3), 1 month (Day 28 ± 3), and 2 months (Day 56 ± 3) post-hospital discharge.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Public Health Scotland, Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group, 2024. Audit of Critical Care in Scotland 2024: Reporting on 2023. Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh
- National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD), 2025. Recovery Beyond Survival: A review of the quality of rehabilitation care provided to patients following an admission to an intensive care unit. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death, London.
- Walsh TS, Pauley E, Donaghy E, Thompson J, Barclay L, Parker RA, Weir C, Marple J. Does a screening checklist for complex health and social care needs have potential clinical usefulness for predicting unplanned hospital readmissions in intensive care survivors: development and prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 23;12(3):e056524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056524.
- Tsanas A. Investigating Wrist-Based Acceleration Summary Measures across Different Sample Rates towards 24-Hour Physical Activity and Sleep Profile Assessment. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 17;22(16):6152. doi: 10.3390/s22166152.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AC25224
- 15096009 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NHS Lothian Intensive Care Charity)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)
-
Hongying Jiang, MDNot yet recruitingPost-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)China
-
COEN MatteoRecruitingPost Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)Switzerland
-
Zealand University HospitalNot yet recruitingPost-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) | Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients | Symptom Burden
-
Hongying Jiang, MDNot yet recruitingMechanical Ventilation | Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) | Critical Illness RecoveryChina
-
Malcom Randall VA Medical CenterRecruitingPost Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)United States
-
KK Women's and Children's HospitalNational University Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School; Singapore...Recruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRecruitingPost Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)France
-
Carola Giménez-Esparza VichRecruitingCritical Illness | Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)Spain
-
ARH van Zanten, MD PhDWageningen University and Research; TKI Agri & Food; Danone Global Research &...RecruitingPost-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)Netherlands
-
Radboud University Medical CenterRecruitingPost-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)Netherlands