Prospective Study of Postictal Psychotic Symptoms Occuring After Video-EEG Monitoring in Focal Epilepsies (INSPEV)

May 13, 2026 updated by: TARRADA Alexis, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Incidence of Postictal Psychotic Symptoms After a Video-EEG Monitoring : Impact of Focal Epileptic Seizures

Psychotic disorders are up to eight times more prevalent in patients with epilepsy compared to the general population. Among them, postictal psychosis (PIP) is a severe complication of focal epilepsy, characterized by a brief psychotic episode emerging days after a seizure. This project investigates a potentially attenuated and under-recognized manifestation-postictal psychotic symptoms (PPs)-that may arise following hospitalization in a video-EEG monitoring unit and might serve as an early indicator for future PIP.

The investigators hypothesize that the incidence of PPs is substantially higher than the 3% PIP prevalence reported in the literature and that their occurrence correlates with the intensity of epileptic activity triggered during video-EEG monitoring. The study has three main objectives: (1) to determine the incidence of PPs in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, (2) to identify predictive factors associated with PPs, and (3) to assess the validity of the PQ-16 screening tool in this clinical context.

A prospective monocentric study will be conducted in the video-EEG unit of Nancy University Hospital. One hundred and ten patients hospitalized for at least five days will be included. Psychiatric assessments will include standardized clinical interviews, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scoring, and self-report questionnaires. These evaluations will take place at three timepoints: baseline (V1), 3-5 days post-discharge (V2), and two months post-discharge (V3).

This study aims to facilitate the early identification of PPs and support the development of preventive strategies, ultimately improving psychiatric care and overall management in patients with epilepsy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The incidence of psychotic disorders during epilepsy is eight times higher than in the general population (Clancy et al., 2014). These disorders are classified according to their chronological link to seizures. A distinction is made between (1) peri-ictal disorders: occurring before, during, or after a seizure, and (2) interictal disorders: unrelated to the occurrence of a seizure. Among the peri-ictal disorders, postictal psychosis (PIP) constitutes a complication of epilepsy, marked by the sudden occurrence of a psychotic episode in the days following a seizure. During a PIP episode, delusional, hallucinatory, and manic symptoms are observed, often accompanied by significant agitation and, in some cases, violent behavior or self-harm. A study of 77 cases of PIP found that approximately one-third of the patients had committed a self- or other-directed act of aggression (Tarrada et al., 2022).

Other studies, all retrospective, have highlighted several risk factors for PIP, such as long-standing drug-resistant focal temporal epilepsy (typically evolving over 15 to 20 years), seizure clusters, bilateral tonic-clonic generalization of seizures, and the presence of independent bilateral epileptic anomalies. The estimated prevalence of PIP is approximately 2% to 4% according to current literature. This complication appears to be more common following video-EEG hospitalizations, during which seizures may be intentionally provoked for diagnostic purposes. PIP therefore represents a significant and potentially severe complication of both epilepsy and video-EEG, underscoring the need for early detection to mitigate its consequences.

Additionally, it is very likely that patients may experience psychotic symptoms (hallucinations, delusional thoughts) in a milder form during the days following video-EEG, which could be predictive of future PIP episodes. These subthreshold postictal psychotic symptoms (PPs) are currently poorly understood, especially among non-specialist psychiatrists and neurologists, contributing to their under-recognition and underdiagnosis-particularly when symptoms do not reach the threshold of a fully developed PIP.

The hypotheses to be verified are as follows: (1) The incidence of PPs is significantly higher (at least fourfold) than the prevalence of PIP (3%) reported in the literature. (2) The incidence of PPs increases proportionally with the number of seizures induced during video-EEG monitoring.

The investigators will conduct a prospective monocentric cohort study, based on regular psychiatric assessment and interventions, at the beginning of video-EEG hospitalization, and until 2 months after discharge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • confirmed diagnosis of drug-resistant focal epilepsy
  • hospitalization for at least 5 days video-EEG (or SEEG) monitoring
  • capable of providing informed consent, able to communicate in French, and covered by a national health insurance plan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting with psychotic symptoms at baseline (V1), or who have had recent modifications (less than 15 days before admission) to their antiepileptic or psychotropic medications, will be excluded to reduce confounding factors in the assessment of postictal psychotic symptoms.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Psychiatric prospective follow-up

Description of the experimental design Data Collection and Visits

  1. Visit 0 (V0): Patient information and consent collection after eligibility screening.
  2. Visit 1 (V1): Psychiatric evaluation at the start of hospitalization, prior to any tapering of antiepileptic treatment. If psychotic symptoms are detected at this stage, the patient will be excluded from the study.
  3. Visit 2 (V2): Psychiatric assessment 3-5 days after discharge from video-EEG hospitalization. This timing is based on the average latency for PIP onset.
  4. Visit 3 (V3): Final evaluation two months after discharge, corresponding to the maximum observed latency for PIP.

Each visit includes:

  • A semi-structured psychiatric clinical interview (adapted from the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, M.I.N.I.)
  • Clinician-rated assessment with the BPRS
  • Self-report questionnaires: for depression, anxiety and psychosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of postictal psychotic symptoms
Time Frame: From enrollment until 2 months after video-EEG discharge
The percentage of patients presenting PPs after a video-EEG hospitalization. The diagnosis of PPs will be established based on a structured psychiatric clinical interview and the score obtained on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Adachi et al., 2024). This incidence will be compared with the 3% prevalence found in the literature. The BPRS is the reference scale in studies addressing psychotic symptoms in epilepsy and requires clinician scoring by a psychiatrist.
From enrollment until 2 months after video-EEG discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk factors associated with the occurrence of psychotic symptoms following video-EEG
Time Frame: From enrollment until 2 months after video-EEG discharge
Risk factors will be assessed based on variables related to the video-EEG hospitalization (e.g., number and type of seizures, presence of subclinical seizures, drug withdrawal), characteristics of epilepsy (type, focus, duration, seizure frequency, treatments), and psychiatric history or comorbidities.
From enrollment until 2 months after video-EEG discharge
Psychometric properties and diagnostic performance of the Prodromal Questionnaire-16 (PQ-16)
Time Frame: From enrollment until 2 months after video-EEG discharge
Psychometric validation of the PQ-16 will involve assessing internal consistency, structural validity, and diagnostic performance. Analyses will identify an optimal cut-off score and calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The gold standard will be the diagnosis of PPs based on a psychiatric clinical interview and BPRS scoring.
From enrollment until 2 months after video-EEG discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024PI259

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychotic Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Psychiatric assessment

Subscribe