Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

March 13, 2026 updated by: Yongquan Shi, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

A Comparative Retrospective Observational Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib as First-Line and Rescue Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

The aim of this retrospective observational study is to investigate and compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib when used as first-line exposure versus rescue exposure in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC).

The key questions to be addressed are:

In patients with ASUC, does upadacitinib administered as first-line induction exposure result in higher rates of colectomy-free survival, clinical remission, and endoscopic healing compared with its use as rescue exposure following failure of conventional or biologic therapies? What are the differences in the incidence, type, and severity of adverse events between these two real-world treatment exposure patterns?

The researchers will conduct a retrospective analysis of medical records and electronic health data from patients diagnosed with ASUC who received upadacitinib either as part of routine first-line clinical care or routine rescue clinical care. All treatment decisions were made by treating clinicians per standard of care; the investigator did not assign or modify any therapeutic interventions. Data will be collected during a defined follow-up period to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety profiles of the two treatment exposure strategies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a retrospective observational cohort study. All interventions described are part of routine clinical care for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Treatment decisions were made by treating clinicians per standard of care; the investigator did not prospectively assign, modify, or control any therapeutic interventions. Participants did not receive any intervention specifically for the purpose of this study. The study only involves retrospective analysis of existing medical records to compare real-world outcomes between different treatment exposure patterns.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Xijing Hospital,Fourth Military Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study conducted at 11 tertiary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) centers in China from June 2023 to December 2025. A total of 81 patients diagnosed with ASUC according to the modified Truelove and Witts criteria were enrolled. All patients received upadacitinib as first-line or rescue therapy. The study population was categorized into two groups: the first-line therapy group (upadacitinib administered in ASUC patients who had not previously received corticosteroids or biologics during this episode) and the rescue therapy group (including second-line and third-line therapy, defined as upadacitinib initiation after failure of intravenous methylprednisolone or both intravenous methylprednisolone and infliximab).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients diagnosed with ASUC according to the modified Truelove and Witts criteria;
  2. Patients treated with upadacitinib at 11 tertiary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) centers in China from June 2023 to December 2025;
  3. Patients with complete and available clinical, endoscopic, and follow-up data;
  4. Patients for whom the study was approved by the Institutional Research 5.Ethics Committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with hemodynamic instability;
  2. Patients with obvious liver and kidney function injury: bilirubin,aminotransferase (ALT, AST) exceeded the upper limit of normal by 2 times; eGFR < 60ml/min or dialysis patients;
  3. Patients allergic to upadacitinib or its excipients;
  4. Patients whose primary disease was gastrointestinal malignancy;
  5. Patients currently suffering from serious or uncontrolled underlying diseases of the blood, digestive tract, metabolism, endocrine, lung, heart, nervous system, mental system, etc.;
  6. Female patients during pregnancy and breastfeeding (including patients with reproductive needs);
  7. Patients with current infection with infectious diseases (hepatitis B, hepatitis C, syphilis, AIDS, tuberculosis, etc.);
  8. Patients with missing key data for outcome assessment;
  9. Any other circumstances which, in the opinion of the investigator, would render the subject unfit for study inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ASUC Patients with First-Line Upadacitinib Exposure
This retrospective observational cohort includes patients diagnosed with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) who received upadacitinib as first-line therapy in routine clinical practice. First-line upadacitinib was defined as administration in ASUC patients who had not previously received corticosteroids or biologics during this episode. All treatment decisions were made by treating clinicians per standard of care; the investigator did not assign or modify any therapeutic interventions, and only retrospectively collected and analyzed clinical outcomes from medical records.
Upadacitinib was administered orally as part of routine clinical care for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), in accordance with standard clinical guidelines. The induction dose was 45 mg once daily for up to 12 weeks (8 weeks for most patients, extended to 12 weeks for a subset with severe disease), followed by a maintenance dose of 30 mg once daily. All dosing decisions were made by treating clinicians; the investigator did not assign, modify, or control any dosing regimen for research purposes.
ASUC Patients with Rescue Upadacitinib Exposure
This retrospective observational cohort includes patients diagnosed with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) who received upadacitinib as part of routine rescue therapy (second- and third-line treatment). Second-line rescue therapy was defined as upadacitinib initiation after 3-5 days of intravenous methylprednisolone (40-60 mg/day) with inadequate response. Third-line rescue therapy was defined as upadacitinib use following failure of both intravenous methylprednisolone and infliximab during the same ASUC episode. All treatment decisions were made by treating clinicians in accordance with standard of care; the investigator did not assign, modify, or control any therapeutic interventions, and only retrospectively collected and analyzed clinical outcomes from medical records.
Upadacitinib was administered orally as part of routine clinical care for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), in accordance with standard clinical guidelines. The induction dose was 45 mg once daily for up to 12 weeks (8 weeks for most patients, extended to 12 weeks for a subset with severe disease), followed by a maintenance dose of 30 mg once daily. All dosing decisions were made by treating clinicians; the investigator did not assign, modify, or control any dosing regimen for research purposes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical-endoscopic remission rate at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
Clinical remission is defined as a total Mayo score ≤ 2 with no subscore > 1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0; endoscopic remission is defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 without mucosal friability.Clinical-endoscopic remission requires achievement of both clinical and endoscopic remission, assessed at 12weeks after upadacitinib initiation.
12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
Colectomy-free rate within 90 days
Time Frame: 90 days after upadacitinib initiation
The proportion of ASUC patients who did not undergo colectomy within 90 days after the initiation of upadacitinib treatment
90 days after upadacitinib initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Outcomes-2 (PRO2) score at week 1
Time Frame: 1 week after upadacitinib initiation
1 week after upadacitinib initiation
Clinical response rate at weeks 8 and 12
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
8 weeks and 12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
Clinical remission rate at weeks 8 and 12
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
8 weeks and 12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rate at weeks 8 and 12
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
8 weeks and 12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
Endoscopic response rate at week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
Endoscopic remission rate at week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
12 weeks after upadacitinib initiation
Adverse events (AEs) rate
Time Frame: From upadacitinib initiation to study completion
From upadacitinib initiation to study completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Clinical Trials on Upadacitinib

Subscribe