Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib Plus Vedolizumab vs Upadacitinib Monotherapy During Induction in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

July 29, 2026 updated by: Jiayin Yao, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib Plus Vedolizumab Versus Upadacitinib Monotherapy During Induction in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

This multicenter retrospective comparative cohort study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib plus vedolizumab compared with upadacitinib monotherapy during 8-week induction in adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

Consecutive eligible patients who initiated upadacitinib induction therapy, either as monotherapy or with concomitant vedolizumab, between January 2023 and September 2025 at six tertiary inflammatory bowel disease referral centers in China were included.

The primary outcome was modified Mayo clinical remission at week 8. Secondary outcomes were modified Mayo clinical response, C-reactive protein normalization among patients with an elevated baseline C-reactive protein concentration, and endoscopic remission. Safety outcomes were assessed from the index date through the week-8 assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This multicenter retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted at six tertiary inflammatory bowel disease referral centers in China. Consecutive adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis who initiated upadacitinib induction therapy, either as monotherapy or with concomitant vedolizumab, between January 2023 and September 2025 were screened for eligibility.

The index date was defined as the date of upadacitinib initiation. Treatment exposure was classified according to the regimen initiated at the index date: upadacitinib monotherapy or upadacitinib plus vedolizumab. The same eligibility criteria, treatment exposure definitions, assessment windows, outcome definitions, and statistical procedures were applied to both treatment groups.

Patients in the combination-therapy group received oral upadacitinib 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks and intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg at weeks 0, 2, and 6. Patients in the monotherapy group received oral upadacitinib 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks without concomitant vedolizumab or another advanced therapy.

Baseline clinical and biochemical assessments were defined as the most recent eligible assessments obtained before or on the index date. Week-8 clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic assessments were defined as the eligible assessments closest to day 56 after upadacitinib initiation. Endoscopic recordings were centrally reviewed by blinded gastroenterologists, and disagreements were resolved by a third blinded adjudicator.

The primary outcome was modified Mayo clinical remission at week 8. Secondary outcomes were modified Mayo clinical response, C-reactive protein normalization among patients with an elevated baseline C-reactive protein concentration, and endoscopic remission. Safety was assessed from the index date through the week-8 assessment.

The primary analysis used propensity score-based stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, targeting the average treatment effect in the study population. Adjusted risk differences were estimated using survey-weighted linear probability models, and adjusted risk ratios were estimated using survey-weighted quasi-Poisson regression models with robust design-based standard errors. Sensitivity analyses included stabilized weights truncated at the 1st and 99th percentiles, overlap weighting, and conventional multivariable logistic regression without propensity-score weighting.

The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (approval number 2026ZSLYEC-079). The requirement for informed consent was waived because the study involved retrospective analysis of de-identified clinical data.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Foshan, Guangdong, China, 510260
        • Recruiting
        • The first people's Hospital of Foshan
        • Contact:
      • Foshan, Guangdong, China, 528000
        • Recruiting
        • Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital, Foshan
        • Contact:
      • Foshan, Guangdong, China, 528200
        • Recruiting
        • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, South China University of Technology City: Foshan
        • Contact:
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510260
        • Recruiting
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
        • Contact:
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 501655
        • Recruiting
        • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun yat-sen University
        • Contact:
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518000
        • Recruiting
        • the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (People's Hospital of Shenzhen Bao'an District)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consisted of consecutive adults aged 18 years or older with an established diagnosis of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis who initiated upadacitinib induction therapy, either as monotherapy or with concomitant vedolizumab, at six tertiary inflammatory bowel disease referral centers in China between January 2023 and September 2025.

The index date was defined as the date of upadacitinib initiation. Treatment was selected by the treating physician as part of routine clinical care.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or older at the index date.
  2. Established diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for at least 3 months, supported by compatible clinical, endoscopic, and histologic findings.
  3. Moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis at baseline, defined as a modified Mayo score of 4 to 9 and a Mayo endoscopic subscore of at least 2.
  4. Initiation of upadacitinib induction therapy during the predefined study period.
  5. For the combination-therapy group, initiation of vedolizumab concomitantly with upadacitinib at the index date.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Crohn's disease, inflammatory bowel disease unclassified, indeterminate colitis, or another form of non-ulcerative-colitis colitis.
  2. Previous colectomy or colectomy planned at the index date.
  3. Previous exposure to upadacitinib or vedolizumab.
  4. Initiation of another biologic or small-molecule advanced therapy during the 8-week induction period, except for vedolizumab in the combination-therapy group.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Upadacitinib Plus Vedolizumab
Patients received oral upadacitinib 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks and intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 during induction.
Oral Upadacitinib 45mg/d for 8 weeks in the induction therapy.
Vedolizumab 300mg intravenously on weeks 0, 2, 6.
Upadacitinib Monotherapy
Patients received oral upadacitinib 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks without concomitant vedolizumab or another advanced therapy.
Oral Upadacitinib 45mg/d for 8 weeks in the induction therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical remission rate at the 8th-week
Time Frame: 8th-week
Clinical remission is defined as a total Mayo score ≤2, with no individual subscore >1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
8th-week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endoscopic remission rate at the 8th week
Time Frame: 8th-week
Endoscopic remission is defined as Mayo endoscopic score(MES) =0
8th-week
Clincial response rate at the 8th week
Time Frame: 8th-week
Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline in the modified Mayo score of at least 2 points and at least 30%, accompanied by either a decrease in the rectal-bleeding subscore of at least 1 point or an absolute rectal-bleeding subscore of 1 or less.
8th-week
C-Reactive Protein normalization rate at the 8th week
Time Frame: 8th-week
C-reactive protein normalization was evaluated only among patients with a baseline C-reactive protein concentration greater than 5 mg/L. Normalization was defined as a week-8 serum C-reactive protein concentration of 5 mg/L or less. Patients with a baseline C-reactive protein concentration of 5 mg/L or less were not included in the denominator for this outcome.
8th-week

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events During the 8-Week Induction Period
Time Frame: Week 0 to Week 8
Safety outcomes included any adverse event, serious adverse events, and permanent treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event. Infections, herpes zoster, thromboembolic events, cardiovascular events, and clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities were recorded when explicitly documented in the electronic medical records, laboratory systems, or medication-administration records.
Week 0 to Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared due to institutional policies and patient privacy considerations. The dataset contains identifiable clinical information from multiple centers, and data sharing is restricted by local ethics committee regulations.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe