Efficacy and Mechanisms of Escitalopram in Drug-Naïve First-Episode Major Depressive Disorder

August 18, 2026 updated by: Weihua Yue, Peking University

The goal of this project is to quantify the effectiveness and safety of escitalopram oxalate oral solution in the treatment of first-episode, drug-naïve patients with major depressive disorder, and to explore the mechanisms underlying its antidepressant effects using multi-omics approaches. By integrating clinical, cognitive, laboratory, imaging, genetic, and environmental data, the study aims to identify patient subgroups who are most likely to benefit from escitalopram, thereby promoting individualized and precision treatment for depression.

This multicenter, prospective, single-arm intervention study will enroll 200 adults aged 18-65 years with major depressive disorder, who will receive escitalopram oxalate oral solution for 8 weeks. Depressive symptoms, cognitive function, and adverse events will be assessed at baseline, during treatment, and after 8 weeks of treatment to evaluate efficacy and safety. Escitalopram blood concentrations will be measured at week 4 to monitor treatment adherence and support safety evaluation. Through comprehensive data collection and multimodal analysis, this project seeks to clarify the biological mechanisms of escitalopram and provide evidence to guide more precise clinical use of antidepressant therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100191
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University Sixth Hostipal
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
    • Hebei
      • Baoding, Hebei, China, 071000
        • Recruiting
        • Hebei Provincial Mental Health Center
        • Contact:
      • Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China, 050031
        • Recruiting
        • The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110001
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250014
        • Recruiting
        • Shandong Mental Health Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18-65 years (including 18 and 65), no gender restriction, Han Chinese ethnicity.
  2. Meets the diagnostic criteria for depressive disorders according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), confirmed by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, version 5.0 (MINI).
  3. Outpatients or inpatients; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 items (HAMD-17) score ≥17; Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32) score ≤13; and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score ≥4.
  4. First depressive episode (duration ≤3 months), with no use of antidepressants or other psychotropic medications in the past 3 months.
  5. Written informed consent obtained from the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria other mental disorders, including schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, bipolar and related disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, etc..
  2. Individuals with intellectual disabilities or who are unable to cooperate for other reasons, or those lacking or having incomplete civil capacity during the onset of illness;
  3. Suffering from neurological or organic brain diseases (such as stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, brain tumors, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, etc.) and a history of severe traumatic brain injury;
  4. Have attempted suicide within the past 3 months, or currently present a high suicide risk, defined as a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) item 10 score ≥5.
  5. Are pregnant or breastfeeding, cannot use reliable contraception during the study, or plan to conceive (or impregnate a partner) within 3 months after study initiation.
  6. Have known allergies to escitalopram oxalate or its excipients.
  7. Are currently taking medications that may interfere with the evaluation of escitalopram efficacy.
  8. Have participated in another drug clinical trial within the past 3 months.
  9. Have contraindications to MRI scanning, such as metal implants or claustrophobia.
  10. Considered unsuitable for study participation by the investigators for any other reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Escitalopram
Participants will receive escitalopram oral solution as open-label monotherapy.
Participants will receive escitalopram oral solution as open-label monotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)
Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
The outcome is assessed by 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Scale. Total HAMD scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The change of HAMD from baseline to 8-week (after intervention) was used as the primary outcome.
Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain imaging features
Time Frame: Week 0 and 8 of treatment duration
Acquisition was performed by magnetic resonance imaging
Week 0 and 8 of treatment duration
Escitalopram Therapeutic drug monitoring
Time Frame: Week 4 of treatment duration
Week 4 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The MADRS consists of 10 clinician-rated items with a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Response to treatment
Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Treatment response is defined as a ≥50% reduction from baseline in either the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) total score or the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score.
Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S)
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
The Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) scale is a clinician-rated measure of illness severity ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher scores indicate greater illness severity.
Baseline; Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in C-BCT score
Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in the Cognitive Bias Questionnaire (C-BCT) T-score. The C-BCT score is standardized as a T-score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher T-scores indicate greater cognitive function.
Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)
Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) total score. The HAMA contains 14 items with a total score ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.
Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS)
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
The Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) is used to assess adverse events during treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 350 (please specify according to the version used). Higher scores indicate greater severity of treatment-emergent adverse effects.
Baseline; Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)
Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) total score. The SHAPS consists of 14 items with a total score ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicate greater anhedonia.
Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS)
Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) total score. The score ranges from 0 to 100 depending on the version used. Higher scores indicate greater hedonic capacity.
Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ)
Time Frame: Baseline
The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) assesses childhood maltreatment experiences. The total score ranges from 28 to 140. Higher scores indicate more severe childhood trauma.
Baseline
Change from baseline in Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS)
Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in the Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) total score. The total score ranges from 22 to 88. Higher scores indicate greater rumination.
Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.
Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 (25-item version). Higher scores indicate greater psychological resilience.
Week 4 and 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in liver function biomarkers
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Both biomarkers are measured in IU/L.
Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in lipid biomarkers
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). All biomarkers are measured in mmol/L.
Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in fasting blood glucose
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in fasting blood glucose, measured in mmol/L.
Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment duration
Change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), measured as percentage (%).
Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment duration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe