A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Flexible Doses of Intranasal Esketamine Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Adult Participants With Treatment-resistant Depression

May 23, 2022 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Flexible Doses of Intranasal Esketamine Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Adult Subjects With Treatment-resistant Depression

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of switching adult participants with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) from a prior antidepressant treatment (to which they have not responded) to flexibly dosed intranasal esketamine (56 milligram [mg] or 84 mg) plus a newly initiated oral antidepressant compared with switching to a newly initiated oral antidepressant (active comparator) plus intranasal placebo, in improving depressive symptoms. Efficacy will be assessed by the change from baseline in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from Day 1 (before randomization) to the end of the 4-week double-blind treatment phase.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

252

Phase

  • Phase 3

Expanded Access

Approved for sale to the public. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100088Chile
        • Beijing Anding Hospital of Capital Medical University
      • Beijing, China, 100096
        • Beijing HuiLong Guan Hospital
      • Beijing, China, 100191
        • Peking University Sixth Hospital
      • Changsha, China, 410011
        • The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
      • Changsha, China, 410007
        • The Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province / Brian Hospital of Hunan Province
      • Chengdu, China, 610041
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
      • Chongqing, China, 401147
        • Chongqing Mental Health Center
      • Guangzhou, China, 510000
        • the 3rd Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yansen University
      • Guangzhou, China, 510100
        • Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
      • Hangzhou, China, 310000
        • Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital
      • Hangzhou, China, 310003
        • First Hospital, Zhejiang University Medical College
      • Hangzhou, China, 310009
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
      • Hu Zhou, China, 313000
        • Huzhou third people's Hospital
      • Kunming City, China, 650032
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical Unversity
      • Nanjing, China, 210000
        • Nanjing Brain Hospital Affilicated to Nanjing Medical University
      • Shijiazhuang, China, 050031
        • The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
      • Tianjin, China, 300222
        • Tianjin Anding Hospital
      • Urumqi, China, 830054
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
      • Urumqi, China, 830000
        • Urumqi fourth Hospital
      • Wuhan, China, 430060
        • Renmin Hospital of Wuhan Universtiy / Hubei General Hospital
      • Xi'an, China, 710061
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
      • Xi'an, China, 710061
        • Xi'an Mental Health Center
      • Xia Men, China, 361012
        • Xiamen Xianyue Hospital
      • Zheng Zhou, China, 450052
        • The first affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30331
        • Atlanta Center for Medical Research
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71104-2136
        • Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana
    • Maryland
      • Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States, 20877
        • CBH Health
    • Massachusetts
      • Watertown, Massachusetts, United States, 02472
        • Adams Clinical
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10128
        • The Medical Research Network, LLC
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73106
        • IPS Research Company

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 62 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At the start of the screening/prospective observational phase, participant must meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fifth edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) or single-episode MDD, without psychotic features, based upon clinical assessment and confirmed by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (mental status questionnaire) (MINI)
  • At the start of the screening/prospective observational phase, participant must have had non-response (less than or equal to [<=] 25 percent [%] improvement) to >=1 but <=5 (if current episode is greater than (>) 2 years or not definable, upper limit is applicable to only the last 2 years) oral antidepressant treatments in the current episode of depression, assessed using the Massachusetts General Hospital - Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (MGH-ATRQ) and confirmed by documented records (for example, medical/ pharmacy/prescription records or letter from a treating physician). In addition, the participant is taking a different oral antidepressant treatment (on the MGH-ATRQ) for at least the previous 2 weeks at or above the minimum therapeutic dose
  • The participant's current major depressive episode, depression symptom severity (Week 1 Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score >=28 required), and antidepressant treatment response in the current depressive episode, must be confirmed using a Clinical-Validation Inventory for Study Admission (C-VISA)
  • Participant must be medically stable on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs (including blood pressure), pulse oximetry, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) performed in the screening/prospective observational phase. If there are any abnormalities that are not specified in the inclusion and exclusion criteria, they must be consistent with the underlying illness in the study population. This determination must be recorded in the participant's source documents and initialed or signed by the investigator
  • Participant must be medically stable on the basis of clinical laboratory tests performed in the screening/prospective observational phase. If the results of the serum chemistry panel, hematology, or urinalysis are outside the normal reference ranges, the participant may be included only if the investigator judges the abnormalities or deviations from normal to be not clinically significant or to be appropriate and reasonable for the population under study. This determination must be recorded in the participant's source documents and initialed or signed by the investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The participant's depressive symptoms have previously demonstrated non-response to:

    1. Esketamine or ketamine in the current major depressive episode per clinical judgment, or
    2. All of the oral antidepressant treatment options available in the respective country for the double-blind phase (that is, duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, and venlafaxine XR) in the current major depressive episode (based on MGH-ATRQ), or
    3. An adequate course of treatment with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the current major depressive episode, defined as at least 7 treatments with unilateral/bilateral ECT
  • Participant has received vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) or has received deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the current episode of depression
  • Participant has a current or prior DSM-5 diagnosis of a psychotic disorder or MDD with psychotic features, bipolar or related disorders (confirmed by the MINI), obsessive compulsive disorder (current only), intellectual disability (DSM-5 diagnostic codes 315.8, 317, 318.0, 318.1, 318.2 and 319), autism spectrum disorder, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, or narcissistic personality disorder
  • Participant has homicidal ideation/intent, per the investigator's clinical judgment, or has suicidal ideation with some intent to act within 6 months prior to the start of the screening/prospective observational phase, per the investigator's clinical judgment or based on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), corresponding to a response of "Yes" on Item 4 (active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan) or Item 5 (active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent) for suicidal ideation on the C-SSRS, or a history of suicidal behavior within the past year prior to the start of the screening/prospective observational phase. Participants reporting suicidal ideation with intent to act or suicidal behavior prior to the start of the double-blind treatment phase should be excluded
  • Participant has a history of moderate or severe substance or alcohol use disorder according to DSM-5 criteria, except nicotine or caffeine, within 6 months before the start of screening/prospective observational phase a. A history (lifetime) of ketamine, phencyclidine (PCP), lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), or 3, 4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA) hallucinogen-related use disorder is exclusionary

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intranasal Esketamine plus Oral Antidepressant
Eligible participants will self-administer esketamine (56 mg or 84 mg) intranasally twice per week for 4 weeks as a flexible dose regimen in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase. All participants will start at a dose of 56 milligram (mg) on Day 1. The dose may be increased to 84 mg or maintained at 56 mg per investigator's discretion. In addition, participants will simultaneously initiate a new, open-label 1 of 4 oral antidepressant medications (duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine extended release [XR]) on Day 1 that will be continued for the duration of the 4-week Double-Blind Treatment Phase.
Participants will self-administer 56 mg of esketamine as intranasal spray.
Participants will self-administer 84 mg of esketamine as intranasal spray.
Duloxetine can be selected as the oral antidepressant medication based on investigator's discretion. The minimum therapeutic dose is 60 milligram per day (mg/day).
Escitalopram can be selected as the oral antidepressant medication based on investigator's discretion. Escitalopram will be started at a dose of 10 mg/day and up-titrated to a maximum dose of 20 mg/day.
Sertraline can be selected as the oral antidepressant medication based on investigator's discretion. Sertraline will be started at a dose of 50 mg/day and up-titrated to a maximum dose of 200 mg/day.
Venlafaxine XR can be selected as the oral antidepressant medication based on investigator's discretion. Venlafaxine XR will be started at a dose of 75 mg/day and up-titrated to a maximum dose of 225 mg/day.
Active Comparator: Oral Antidepressant plus Intranasal Placebo
Eligible Participants will self-administer matching placebo intranasally twice per week for 4 weeks in Double-Blind Treatment Phase. In addition, participants will simultaneously initiate a new, open-label oral antidepressant medications (duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine XR) on Day 1 that will be continued for the duration of Double-Blind Treatment Phase.
Duloxetine can be selected as the oral antidepressant medication based on investigator's discretion. The minimum therapeutic dose is 60 milligram per day (mg/day).
Escitalopram can be selected as the oral antidepressant medication based on investigator's discretion. Escitalopram will be started at a dose of 10 mg/day and up-titrated to a maximum dose of 20 mg/day.
Sertraline can be selected as the oral antidepressant medication based on investigator's discretion. Sertraline will be started at a dose of 50 mg/day and up-titrated to a maximum dose of 200 mg/day.
Venlafaxine XR can be selected as the oral antidepressant medication based on investigator's discretion. Venlafaxine XR will be started at a dose of 75 mg/day and up-titrated to a maximum dose of 225 mg/day.
Participants will self-administer matching placebo as intranasal spray.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score to the End of Double-blind Treatment Phase (Day 28)
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of the double-blind treatment phase (Day 28)
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detects changes due to antidepressant treatment. The scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, inability to feel (interest level), pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score range of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement.
Baseline up to end of the double-blind treatment phase (Day 28)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the MADRS Total Score to 24 Hours Post First Dose (Day 2)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1: predose) to 24 hours post first dose (Day 2)
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detects changes due to antidepressant treatment. The scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, inability to feel (interest level), pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score range of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement.
Baseline (Day 1: predose) to 24 hours post first dose (Day 2)
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score to the End of Double-blind Treatment Phase (Day 28)
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of the double-blind treatment phase (Day 28)
The SDS is a subject-reported outcome measure that consists of a 5-item questionnaire which has been widely used and accepted for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first three items assess disruption of (1) work/school, (2) social life, and (3) family life/home responsibilities using a 0-10 rating scale. The score for the first three items are summed to create a total score of 0-30, where a higher score indicates greater impairment. It also has one item on days lost from school or work and one item on days when underproductive.
Baseline up to end of the double-blind treatment phase (Day 28)
Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Response
Time Frame: Day 2 up to Day 28
Onset of clinical response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) improvement from baseline in MADRS total score with onset by Day 2 that was maintained through Day 28. The MADRS scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, inability to feel (interest level), pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score range of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement.
Day 2 up to Day 28
Percentage of Responders at the End of Double-blind Treatment Phase (Day 28)
Time Frame: Day 28
Percentage of responders at the end of double-blind treatment phase (Day 28) were assessed. A participant was defined as a responder at a given time point if the percent improvement from baseline in MADRS total score is at least 50%. The MADRS scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, inability to feel (interest level), pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score range of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement.
Day 28
Percentage of Participants in Remission at the End of Double-blind Treatment Phase (Day 28)
Time Frame: Day 28
Percentage of participants in remission at the end of double-blind treatment phase (Day 28) were assessed. A participant was considered as a remitter if participant had a MADRS total score of less than or equal to [<=] 12 at a visit. MADRS scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, inability to feel (interest level), pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score range of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement.
Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Remission
Time Frame: Up to Day 28
Sustained remission is defined as the first occurrence of remission (MADRS Total score <=12) that was maintained through the Day 28 assessment with one excursion prior to Day 28. The MADRS scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, inability to feel (interest level), pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score range of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement.
Up to Day 28
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score up to the Endpoint (Double-blind Treatment Phase [Day 28])
Time Frame: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
The CGI-S provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure of the severity of the participant's illness that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-S evaluates the severity of psychopathology on a scale of 1 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, a participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating according to: 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. The CGI-S permits a global evaluation of the participant's condition at a given time. Negative change in score indicates improvement. The last post-baseline observation during the double-blind phase was carried forward as Endpoint.
Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
Change From Baseline in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale Score up to the Endpoint (Double-blind Treatment Phase [Day 28])
Time Frame: Baseline up to Endpoint (double-blind treatment phase [Day 28])
The GAD-7 is a brief and validated 7-item self-reported assessment of overall anxiety. Participants respond to each item using a 4 point scale with response categories of 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate more anxiety. The recall period is 2 weeks. The severity of the GAD-7 is categorized as follows: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14) and Severe (15-21). The last post-baseline observation during the double-blind phase was carried forward as the "Endpoint".
Baseline up to Endpoint (double-blind treatment phase [Day 28])
Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score up to the Endpoint (Double-blind Treatment Phase [Day 28]): Health Status Index
Time Frame: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, primarily designed for self-completion by respondents. It essentially consists of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each of the 5 dimensions is divided into 5 levels of perceived problems (Level 1 indicating no problem, Level 2 indicating slight problems, Level 3 indicating moderate problems, Level 4 indicating severe problems, and Level 5 indicating extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health "today". Responses were used to generate a HSI. Health Status Index ranges from -0.148 to 0.949, and is anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health), a lower score indicates worse health.
Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score up to the Endpoint (Double-blind Treatment Phase [Day 28]): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, primarily designed for self-completion by respondents. It essentially consists of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. EQ-VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Positive change in score indicates improvement.
Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) up to the Endpoint (Double-blind Treatment Phase [Day 28]): Sum Score
Time Frame: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health "today". Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health). EQ-VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state.
Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

Clinical Trials on Esketamine 56 mg

3
Subscribe