A Randomised Controlled Trial of ePROM-Guided Flexible Scheduling in Dermatology

March 15, 2026 updated by: National University Hospital, Singapore

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM)-guided flexible scheduling system can improve outpatient clinic resource utilisation in patients attending dermatology outpatient clinics for routine follow-up. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the intervention reduce the number of actualised outpatient visits over 12 months compared with standard fixed scheduling?
  • Does the intervention group achieve higher adherence to monthly ePROM monitoring, as measured by the proportion of completed ePROM submissions?

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Dermatology outpatients otherwise due for a follow-up appointment within six months.
  • Ability to independently navigate and complete ePROMs.
  • Ability to provide informed consent (including parental consent for minors).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who require fixed or scheduled in-person visits, including those needing skin cancer surveillance, bedside procedures (e.g., liquid nitrogen therapy), surgical interventions, or routine blood tests for immunosuppressive therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Participants in the intervention arm will not receive routine follow-up appointments at the end of their consultation. Instead, their monthly ePROM responses will feed a two-layer Bayesian decision system to determine appointment need.
Monthly ePROM responses will feed a Bayesian decision system to determine appointment need, which will then be used to make recommendations to patients for scheduling of appointments.
Monthly electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) surveys will be sent to patients' mobile devices to capture self-reported disease severity data.
Active Comparator: Control Arm
Participants in the control arm will continue standard care, with follow-up appointments scheduled at the end of each consultation. The ePROM responses may be used by patients for self-tracking and will be available to clinicians to inform decision-making at subsequent visits.
Monthly electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) surveys will be sent to patients' mobile devices to capture self-reported disease severity data.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of actualised outpatient visits
Time Frame: baseline to week 52
Difference in actualised outpatient visits (in-person + teleconsult) over 12 months (effectiveness outcome).
baseline to week 52
Proportion of completed monthly ePROMs
Time Frame: baseline to week 52
Difference in proportion of completed monthly ePROMs (implementation outcome)
baseline to week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
No-show rate
Time Frame: baseline to week 52
Number of appointments missed without prior rescheduling or cancellation
baseline to week 52
Cancelled or rescheduled appointments
Time Frame: baseline to week 52
Appointments booked but cancelled or rescheduled before the actual appointment date
baseline to week 52
Urgent care or unscheduled visits
Time Frame: baseline to week 52
Emergency department visits or other urgent care visits related to patient's dermatological condition
baseline to week 52
Skin-specific Quality of Life Impairment
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Changes in quality of life using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Minimum Score: 0 (no impact on quality of life). Maximum Score: 30 (extremely large impact on quality of life).
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Clinician-assessed disease severity
Time Frame: baseline to week 52
Clinician-assessed disease severity using body surface area and the investigator global assessment on a 0-5 NRS
baseline to week 52
Acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: week 52
Assessed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability
week 52
Perceived burden of engaging with the intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Research questionnaire assessing perceived burden of intervention use
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Fidelity to the scheduling algorithm
Time Frame: baseline to week 52
The extent to which algorithm-generated recommendations were followed, overridden, or superseded
baseline to week 52
Barriers and facilitators to implementation
Time Frame: week 52
Explored through semi-structured qualitative interviews
week 52
Bayesian Decision-layer outputs
Time Frame: baseline to week 52
Decision-layer outputs, including monthly posterior summaries and posterior predictive probabilities for each appointment category
baseline to week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ellie Choi, MBBS, National University Hospital, Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD shared includes de-identified demographics, disease outcomes and measures.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD and supporting information will be available from the time of publication and for four years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD and supporting information will be available from the study team on a case-by-case basis upon request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on Flexible ePROM-guided Scheduling System

Subscribe