Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Assessment of CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Treatment of Breast Cancer in Egypt (Clinical and P)

March 17, 2026 updated by: Marwa Mohamed Abd El-Maboud, Beni-Suef University
Cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with ET are considered the standard of care for first-line therapy of patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, advanced BC (HR+/HER2-ABC). CDK4/6 inhibitors are the first ones that were approved by the FDA for clinical treatment. These inhibitors specifically inhibit CDK4/6 and show limited toxicity to normal cells. There are three FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, and they are palbociclib produced by Pfizer, ribociclib produced by Novartis, and abemaciclib produced by Eli Lilly. Palbociclib is the first and most popular CDK4/6 inhibitor, which reached $2.135 billion in global sales in 2016. Ribociclib is very similar to palbociclib in structure, but abemaciclib is quite different. In vitro studies indicated that palbociclib has an almost equivalent inhibition effect on CDK4 and CDK6, while abemaciclib and ribociclib are more potent against CDK4 than CDK6. CDKs are protein kinases that phosphorylate cellular proteins, causing their activation or inactivation during the G1 cell cycle phase. In a dysregulated cell cycle, CDK4/6 proteins bind to cyclin D1 to form an activated complex, which then phosphorylates and inactivates tumor suppressor retinoblastoma protein and releases E2F transcription factors, thus resulting in cell cycle progression and cancer cell proliferation. Introducing highly selective inhibitors of this pathway into clinical practice as CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKi), which act by blocking the cyclin D1/CDK4/6 complex and inhibit cell cycle progression to the S phase and cancer proliferation, is very promising. These novel molecular mechanisms provide a theoretical basis for combination therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors. For instance, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with the hormone receptor antagonist letrozole have been applied for BC therapy. Many other combination therapies involving CDK4/6 inhibitors are currently under clinical trials for a variety of diseases, including anti-cancer therapy. Moreover, the addition of CDKi to ET has been associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS) in hormone receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. Despite the clear clinical benefit from the addition of CDKi to ET shown in several clinical trials, it is critical to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination treatment in routine clinical practice. Real-world data are often used to assess drug efficacy, tolerability, and cost to demonstrate the reproducibility of evidence from randomized clinical trials in daily clinical practice. In addition, real-world data (RWD) enable the assessment of clinical benefit and safety of regimens in populations that are often excluded from clinical trials, such as elderly patients, patients with poor performance status, or patients with multiple comorbidities. Ribociclib (RIB) + ET demonstrated statistically significant PFS and OS benefits over ET alone in 3 Phase 3 clinical trials (MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7) in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor-negative (HR+/HER2-) ABC, including patients with visceral metastases and a high tumor burden. Pharmacoeconomics is a subdiscipline of health economics that is concerned with the comparison and analysis of costs to the related consequences of drug therapy options and strategies. Pharmacoeconomics is specifically important due to the increasing drug therapeutic options and their costs, which are estimated to account for at least 10% of the total health expenditures of each country.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide and accounted for 684,996 BC-associated deaths in 2020. BC was ranked as the highest incident cancer in Middle Eastern countries, accounting for approximately 17.7% to 19% of all new diagnoses of cancers in 2018. BC can be classified into different categories based on different schemes. The classification is primarily based on the histopathological type, the grade of the tumor, the stage of the tumor, and the protein and gene expression status. To improve patient care, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has outlined treatment and monitoring guidelines for BC. These guidelines recommend an initial course of endocrine therapy (ET), such as a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) (e.g., tamoxifen), with or without ovarian ablation/suppression in premenopausal women with HR+ aBC. Chemotherapy is recommended only when there is clear evidence of resistance to ET or in the case of an immediately life-threatening disease. There are some data available that can provide some insights about the incidence of BC among Egyptian women. The basic incidence rates on the national level without non-melanoma skin cancer were 113.1/100,000 (both genders), 115.7/100,000 (males), and 110.3/100,000 (females). The National Cancer Registry Program (NCRP) was developed in 2008 and came to be the sole foundation for cancer prevalence in Egypt. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with ET are considered the standard of care for first-line therapy of patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced BC (HR+/HER2-ABC). CDK4/6 inhibitors are the first ones that were approved by the FDA for clinical treatment. These inhibitors specifically inhibit CDK4/6 and show limited toxicity to normal cells. There are three FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, and they are palbociclib produced by Pfizer, ribociclib produced by Novartis, and abemaciclib produced by Eli Lilly. Palbociclib is the first and most popular CDK4/6 inhibitor, which reached $2.135 billion in global sales in 2016. Ribociclib is very similar to palbociclib in structure, but abemaciclib is quite different. In vitro studies indicated that palbociclib has an almost equivalent inhibition effect on CDK4 and CDK6, while abemaciclib and ribociclib are more potent against CDK4 than CDK6. CDKs are protein kinases that phosphorylate cellular proteins, causing their activation or inactivation during the G1 cell cycle phase. In a dysregulated cell cycle, CDK4/6 proteins bind to cyclin D1 to form an activated complex, which then phosphorylates and inactivates tumor suppressor retinoblastoma protein and releases E2F transcription factors, thus resulting in cell cycle progression and cancer cell proliferation. Introducing highly selective inhibitors of this pathway into clinical practice as CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKi), which act by blocking the cyclin D1/CDK4/6 complex and inhibit cell cycle progression to the S phase and cancer proliferation, is very promising. These novel molecular mechanisms provide a theoretical basis for combination therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors. For instance, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with the hormone receptor antagonist letrozole have been applied for BC therapy. Many other combination therapies involving CDK4/6 inhibitors are currently under clinical trials for a variety of diseases, including anti-cancer therapy. Moreover, the addition of CDKi to ET has been associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS) in hormone receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. Despite the clear clinical benefit from the addition of CDKi to ET shown in several clinical trials, it is critical to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination treatment in routine clinical practice. Real-world data are often used to assess drug efficacy, tolerability, and cost to demonstrate the reproducibility of evidence from randomized clinical trials in daily clinical practice. In addition, real-world data (RWD) enable the assessment of clinical benefit and safety of regimens in populations that are often excluded from clinical trials, such as elderly patients, patients with poor performance status, or patients with multiple comorbidities. Ribociclib (RIB) + ET demonstrated statistically significant PFS and OS benefits over ET alone in 3 Phase 3 clinical trials (MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7) in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor-negative (HR+/HER2-) ABC, including patients with visceral metastases and a high tumor burden. Pharmacoeconomics is a subdiscipline of health economics that is concerned with the comparison and analysis of costs to the related consequences of drug therapy options and strategies. Pharmacoeconomics is specifically important due to the increasing drug therapeutic options and their costs, which are estimated to account for at least 10% of the total health expenditures of each country.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

206

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cairo Governorate
      • Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
        • Gustave Roussy International Hospital in Egypt.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

  • Inclusion criteria

    • Eligible patients will be who with histologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma with HR positive and HER2 negative phenotype and clinical or radiological evidence of metastasis.
    • Only patients with complete medical records from January 2020 December 2024 will be included.
  • Exclusion criteria

    • Exclusion criteria will be devised to ensure the collection of authentic real world data excluding patients those with insufficient clinical documentation, unknown clinical outcomes, or those who transferred to another treatment center during their therapy course.
    • Females younger than 18 years will be excluded.
    • Patients in visceral crisis .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: group 1: ETH + palbciclib
in this group patient receive endocrine therapy (ETH) + Palbociclib as active comparator
Patient receive standard endocrine therapy (ETH) in combination with Palbociclib. palbociclib administered according to standard dosing regimen (125mg /day ) for 3 consecutive weeks , one week off per month
Other Names:
  • Ibrance
Active Comparator: group 2 : ETH + Ribociclib
Patients in this group receive endocrine therapy (ETH) + Ribociclib as active comparator
Ribociclib administered according to standard dosing regimen (600 mg / day ) for 3 consecutive weeks , one week off per month
Other Names:
  • Kasqali
Active Comparator: group 3 : ETH + Abemaciclib
Patients in this group receive endocrine therapy (ETH) + Abemaciclib as active comparator.
Abemaciclib administered according to standard dosing regimen (300 mg / day ) for 3 consecutive weeks , one week off per month
Other Names:
  • Versinio

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1- Progression free survival (PFS).
Time Frame: 1 year
Time from treatment initiation to disease progression or death, measured in months.
1 year
2-Overall Survival
Time Frame: 1 year
Time from treatment initiation to death from any cause, measured in months.
1 year
Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1 year
Frequency and severity of adverse events assessed using CTCAE v4.0.
1 year
Economic outcomes
Time Frame: 1 year
Economic outcomes will be assess cost-utility analysis and the results will be expressed in terms of " Incremental-cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) ".
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Palbocicilib

Subscribe