Remote Microphone Performance Comparison in Adults With Hearing Loss

May 27, 2026 updated by: Sonova AG
This study will compare far-field speech understanding in noise using a hearing aid alone, with using a hearing aid plus a Roger remote microphone. It will also compare the HA+Roger mic to two other manufacturers' hearing aids plus remote mic systems in the same condition.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will recruit 15-20 hearing impaired experienced hearing aid adult users. Participants will be fit with three sets of hearing aids (Phonak devices, plus two competitor devices) and the associated remote microphone from each manufacturer. Speech perception will be measured using the validated AZ Bio test, and will be given in both the hearing aid alone condition, as well as the hearing aid plus remote microphone condition. The participant will be seated in the center of a room approximately 7m by 5.25m with a loudspeaker approximately 3 m away, at 0 degree azimuth. Four loudspeakers will also be placed in the corners of the room. For the quiet condition, target speech will be presented from the loudspeaker in front of the participant, for the noise condition speech will be presented from the front with speech babble presented from each of the corner loudspeakers. The speech understanding score in both quiet and in noise will be measured for hearing aids alone, and hearing aids plus the appropriate compatible remote microphone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Aurora, Illinois, United States, 60504
        • Sonova US Corporate Services

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral sensorineural hearing loss
  • Experienced bilateral hearing aid users
  • Fluent in English, ability to read and write in English
  • Able to produce a reliable study result
  • Willing to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Limited/inconsistent/no prior use of hearing aids
  • Self-reported ear-related pathology(including but not limited to: otorrhea within the past 90 days, dizziness, sudden onset or worsening hearing loss within the past 90 days, otalgia)
  • Visible deformity of the ear
  • Chronic, severe tinnitus
  • Unilateral hearing loss
  • Single sided deafness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Phonak device first, then Device A, then Device B
Participants fit and tested with Phonak devices first, then Devices A, then Devices B
Phonak hearing aid, either used alone or with the compatible remote microphone
First competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Second competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Experimental: Phonak device first, then Device B, than Device A
Participants fit and tested with Phonak device first, then Device B, then Device A
Phonak hearing aid, either used alone or with the compatible remote microphone
First competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Second competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Experimental: Device A first, than Phonak devices, then Device B
Participants fit and tested with Device A first, than Phonak device, then Device B
Phonak hearing aid, either used alone or with the compatible remote microphone
First competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Second competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Experimental: Device A first, than Device B, then Phonak devices
Participants fit and tested with Device A first, than Device B, then Phonak devices
Phonak hearing aid, either used alone or with the compatible remote microphone
First competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Second competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Experimental: Device B, than Phonak devices, than Device A
Participants fit and tested with Device B first, than Phonak devices, then Device A
Phonak hearing aid, either used alone or with the compatible remote microphone
First competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Second competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Experimental: Device B first, then Device A, then Phonak devices
Participants fit and tested with Device B first, then Device A, then Phonak devices
Phonak hearing aid, either used alone or with the compatible remote microphone
First competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone
Second competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AZ Bio Sentence Test
Time Frame: Visit 2, Day 2 of study
Validated test of speech intelligibility in which participants repeat as many words as they can from a presented list of 20 sentences. Words correct are calculated as a percent correct from the total number of words presented. Higher percentages mean better speech intelligibility.
Visit 2, Day 2 of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Phonak

Subscribe