Shockwave for Elbow and Wrist Spasticity in People With Spinal Cord Injury

March 26, 2026 updated by: Nathan Hogaboom, PhD, Kessler Foundation

Pilot Trial of a Novel, Non-invasive Treatment for Upper-limb Spasticity in People With Spinal Cord Injury

Approximately 305,000 people live with a spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States. Sixty percent of these individuals have tetraplegia, which can cause significant dysfunction of the arms and hands. One of the consequences of SCI is spasticity - involuntary activation of muscles that can hinder bodily functions and negatively affect participation in various aspects of life. Spasticity can lead to loss of functional independence and activity limitations, cause pain, and lead to mood disorders like depression. It can even interfere with rehabilitation and lead to hospitalization. In people with tetraplegia, spasticity of the arms and hands can have a tremendous impact on independence and quality of life, and thus regaining function in these areas remains a top priority. Unfortunately, spasticity is difficult to treat. Common treatments include physical therapy, including exercise or stretching; medications such as Baclofen; and injections with agents like botulinum toxin (also known as Botox). Botox injections are often implemented alongside other modalities like therapy, yet they are invasive, tend to last for only a few months, and carry potential side effects. One potential non-invasive treatment for upper limb spasticity is focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (f-ESWT), which involves an external application of high-pressure sound waves, similar to ultrasound. An applicator/handpiece is placed on the skin over the spastic muscle and the focused sound waves are applied. f-ESWT carries no long-term side effects with minimal discomfort during application. However, there has been limited research on this treatment option in people with SCI who have arm and hand dysfunction caused by spasticity. The purpose of this study is to fill in that knowledge gap. This will be accomplished by measuring different aspects of spasticity from the perspective of both the clinician and the person with SCI. These will include clinical measures, such as elbow and wrist range of motion, as well as how the treatment impacts the person's functional independence and quality of life. Ultrasound methods will be used to look at the person's muscles to see if any beneficial changes occur in their structure and stiffness. People with SCI who meet eligibility criteria will be invited to the laboratory to receive f-ESWT, which will occur once per week for three consecutive weeks. Treatment will entail application of f-ESWT to the elbow and wrist flexor muscles. Participants will be invited back to the laboratory to have their spasticity measured by a clinician, be asked questions about how their spasticity has impacted their lives, and have their muscles imaged with ultrasound. Findings from this study are expected to generate insight on whether f-ESWT could be a viable treatment option for spasticity of the arms and hands in people with SCI, and if a larger clinical trial is warranted.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

12

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • West Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07052
        • Recruiting
        • Kessler Foundation
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nathan Hogaboom, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years of age or older.
  2. Have chronic, non-progressive SCI of all levels and severities that occurred greater than 1 year prior to their enrollment.
  3. MAS score of between 1+ and 3 in elbow and wrist flexors of the treated upper limb.
  4. Can be treated with shockwaves. Contraindications include current or recent (within the past 3 months) infection at the site of treatment and severe coagulopathies (e.g. hemophilia).129
  5. No change in antispasmodic medications within the past three months or intended changes over the course of the trial.
  6. Participant is able and willing to comply with the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of surgical procedures in the upper extremity
  2. Severe, inflammatory arthritic diseases
  3. Thrombosis
  4. Anticoagulant medication;
  5. Pregnancy
  6. Cancer
  7. Recent history of local injection of botulinum toxin within 6 months, or phenol/alcohol within the 12 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment
Elbow and Wrist Flexor Focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy
Three sessions of focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy, applied to forearm and elbow flexor muscles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a physical exam maneuver used frequently both clinically and for research purposes to assess the increase in velocity-dependent muscle tone after neurologic disorders. We will be focusing on the MAS score of the ankle plantar flexors. This measure is included in the NINDS list of CDE recommendations for SCI. Specifically, it evaluates the resistance to passive stretch of the ankle joint through full range of motion. Scores range from 0 (no spasticity) to 4 (severe spasticity).
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Modified Penn Spasticity Frequency Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Modified Penn Spasticity Frequency Scale (mPSFS) is a self-report scale with two components, which is meant to provide a more complete understanding of an individual's spasticity status. The first component is comprised of a five-point scale, which assesses spasm frequency between 0 ("no spasms") and 4 ("spontaneous spasms occurring more than 10 times per hour"). The second component includes a three-point scale, which assesses spasm severity between 1 ("mild") and 3 ("severe"); this component is not answered if the individual reports no spasms in part one.
4 weeks
Change in Modified Penn Spasticity Frequency Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Modified Penn Spasticity Frequency Scale (mPSFS) is a self-report scale with two components, which is meant to provide a more complete understanding of an individual's spasticity status. The first component is comprised of a five-point scale, which assesses spasm frequency between 0 ("no spasms") and 4 ("spontaneous spasms occurring more than 10 times per hour"). The second component includes a three-point scale, which assesses spasm severity between 1 ("mild") and 3 ("severe"); this component is not answered if the individual reports no spasms in part one.
8 weeks
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a physical exam maneuver used frequently both clinically and for research purposes to assess the increase in velocity-dependent muscle tone after neurologic disorders. We will be focusing on the MAS score of the ankle plantar flexors. This measure is included in the NINDS list of CDE recommendations for SCI. Specifically, it evaluates the resistance to passive stretch of the ankle joint through full range of motion. Scores range from 0 (no spasticity) to 4 (severe spasticity).
8 weeks
Change in Modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (mPRISM) is a self-reported instrument with 37 items to quantify the impact of spasticity on physical, psychological, and social health-related QOL domains. Each item is rated using a scale of 0 ("never") to 3 ("often/very often"). The scale's psychometric properties have been well-established, including floor and ceiling effects for the various subscales, and it has been shown to be both valid and reliable.
4 weeks
Change in Modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (mPRISM) is a self-reported instrument with 37 items to quantify the impact of spasticity on physical, psychological, and social health-related QOL domains. Each item is rated using a scale of 0 ("never") to 3 ("often/very often"). The scale's psychometric properties have been well-established, including floor and ceiling effects for the various subscales, and it has been shown to be both valid and reliable.
8 weeks
Participant Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) measures global treatment effect by asking the participant to rate with a 7-point scale (anchored by 1 ["very much worse"] and 7 ["very much improved"]) their overall impression following treatment as compared to prior. This scale provides an indication of clinically important improvement and has been used to assess efficacy of spasticity treatments in SCI. 11-week scores will be considered a primary outcome.
4 weeks
Participant Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) measures global treatment effect by asking the participant to rate with a 7-point scale (anchored by 1 ["very much worse"] and ["very much improved"]) their overall impression following treatment as compared to prior. This scale provides an indication of clinically important improvement and has been used to assess efficacy of spasticity treatments in SCI. 11-week scores will be considered a primary outcome.
8 weeks
Biceps brachii muscle echogenicity
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Echogenicity is a measure of a tissue's "brightness." In muscle, this reflects the concentration of connective tissue and thus is a marker of muscle health. We will apply quantitative ultrasound image collection and analysis techniques to quantify the average echogenicity of biceps muscle in longitudinal view.
4 weeks
Biceps brachii muscle echogenicity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Echogenicity is a measure of a tissue's "brightness." In muscle, this reflects the concentration of connective tissue and thus is a marker of muscle health. We will apply quantitative ultrasound image collection and analysis techniques to quantify the average echogenicity of biceps muscle in longitudinal view.
8 weeks
Biceps brachii muscle elasticity
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Elasticity is a measure of a tissue's stiffness. Muscles that are more spastic and have a greater concentration of connective tissue appear stiffer than those in better health. We will apply quantitative ultrasound image collection and analysis techniques to quantify the average elasticity of biceps muscle in longitudinal view.
4 weeks
Biceps brachii muscle elasticity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Elasticity is a measure of a tissue's stiffness. Muscles that are more spastic and have a greater concentration of connective tissue appear stiffer than those in better health. We will apply quantitative ultrasound image collection and analysis techniques to quantify the average elasticity of biceps muscle in longitudinal view.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be shared to protect participants' private clinical data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy

Subscribe