The Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy With Diet

April 27, 2026 updated by: AdventHealth

The Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy With Diet, a Randomized-controlled Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine whether targeted nutritional changes can improve symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy. Impaired blood flow to peripheral nerves-resulting in reduced oxygen delivery and subsequent nerve injury-is a well-established contributor to neuropathy. Prior studies have shown that a whole-food, plant-based diet without added oils can improve or even reverse arterial disease, suggesting a potential mechanism for enhancing nerve perfusion and function.

This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing a whole-food, plant-based diet with standard pharmacologic management for painful diabetic neuropathy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether dietary modification can improve symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) in a randomized controlled trial.

This will be a prospective, randomized controlled study comparing a dietary intervention with conventional medical management over a two-month period. Participants assigned to the conventional management group will have the option to cross over to the dietary intervention after two months, with additional outcomes assessed following crossover.

The dietary intervention is based on a prior case series demonstrating improvement in PDN with a whole-food, plant-based diet excluding all animal products and added oils. Participants will eliminate meat (red and white), dairy, eggs, and added oils. Those in the dietary group will also be encouraged to attend an optional cooking class to support adherence.

Conventional medical management will consist of optimized pharmacologic therapy, including antiepileptic agents (gabapentin or pregabalin), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (e.g., duloxetine), tricyclic antidepressants, and over-the-counter options such as alpha-lipoic acid. Medications will be titrated to maximize pain relief while minimizing adverse effects.

This study will be conducted without external funding.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Hendersonville, North Carolina, United States, 28759
        • Recruiting
        • AdventHealth Hendersonville
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • William J Beckworth, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sven Jonsson, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Definitive diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus (HgA1c ≥ 6.5) or pre-diabetes (HgA1c 5.7-6.4)
  • objective documentation of peripheral neuropathy on EMG/NCS testing defined as a sural-to-radial amplitude ratio of 0.21 or less
  • presence of painful neuropathy in addition to decreased sensation
  • with pain rated ≥4/10 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS)
  • age 18 years or older
  • ability to provide informed consent
  • ability to attend follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Potential causes of neuropathy other than type II diabetes mellitus (as listed below)
  • type I diabetes
  • vitamin B12 deficiency
  • folate deficiency
  • thyroid dysfunction,
  • other nutritional deficiencies
  • autoimmune disorders
  • inflammatory disorders
  • HIV/AIDS
  • exposure to metals or toxins
  • multiple myeloma,
  • moderate to severe lumbar stenosis with neurogenic claudication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diet arm
This is a whole food plant-based diet that excludes meat, dairy, eggs and oil
Plant-based diet
Other Names:
  • Plant-based diet
Experimental: medical managment
This approach reflects standard pharmacologic management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Commonly used medications include antiepileptic agents (gabapentin, pregabalin), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (e.g., duloxetine), tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline, nortriptyline), and over-the-counter options such as alpha-lipoic acid and turmeric.
Medication optimization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 2 months
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a 0-10 pain score with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain ever.
2 months
Average pain on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 2 months
Patient will be asked what his or her "average" pain has been over the last 3 days. This will be on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain ever.
2 months
≥50% improvement of pain
Time Frame: 2 months
Patient will be asked if his or her average pain over the past 3 days is ≥50% better than baseline pain. This will be comparing the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain ever.
2 months
≥75% improvement of pain
Time Frame: 2 months
Patient will be asked if his or her average pain over the past 3 days is ≥75% better than baseline pain. This will be comparing the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain ever.
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Worst Pain Score on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 2 months
Patient will be asked what his or her worst pain is on a daily basis using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain ever.
2 months
Numbness location
Time Frame: 2 months

Patient asked the following:

How far up does your numbness go in both lower extremities: (circle one):

  1. Toes
  2. Mid foot
  3. Entire foot
  4. Ankle
  5. Mid calf
  6. Knee
2 months
Sleep
Time Frame: 2 months

Patient is asked the following questions.

How is your sleep? Circle one: good moderate poor

  1. How many hours are you sleeping a night? ___________________
  2. Is your sleep improved since the start of study? ______________ (yes or no)
2 months
Diabetes medication
Time Frame: 2 months

Patient is asked:

List your diabetes medications and doses.

2 months
Pain medication
Time Frame: 2 months
Patient is asked the following question. List your pain medications and doses.
2 months
% pain improvement
Time Frame: 2 months

Patient is asked:

What percentage of has your pain improved compared to the start of the study? ____________ (0% = no change to 100% complete relief of pain)

2 months
% numbness improvement
Time Frame: 2 months
What percent is your numbness improved compared to baseline? (0% = no improvement, 100% complete improvement)
2 months
Increased function
Time Frame: 2 months
Have you been able to increase your function (walking, getting around, steadiness on feet)? _________ (yes or no)
2 months
Compliance with diet
Time Frame: 2 months

If you are in the diet group, how compliant have you been with your diet? Chose one:

  1. 0% (not compliant at all)
  2. 25%
  3. 50%
  4. 75%
  5. 90%
  6. 100% (completely compliant at all times)
2 months
Global impression of change
Time Frame: 2 months

Rate your global impression of change of your diabetic neuropathy (chose one):

  1. Very much improved
  2. Much improved
  3. Moderately improved
  4. Minimally improved
  5. No change
  6. Worse
  7. Much worse
  8. Very much worse
2 months
Weight
Time Frame: 2 months
Weight in pounds measured at baseline and two months. This is measured in clinic.
2 months
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 2 months
Number of participants with abnormal blood pressure based off the 2017 American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Guidelines.
2 months
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 2 months
Number of participants with abnormal heart rate (outside of normal 60-100/min)
2 months
Creatinine lab level
Time Frame: 2 months
Number of participants with abnormal creatinine lab level (above 1.3 for males, 1.1 for females) and correlating with estimated glomerular filtration rate which is based off creatinine, age and sex. Kidney function will be based on the National Kidney Foundation guidelines (KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease).
2 months
Lipid levels
Time Frame: 2 months
Percentage of patients with abnormal lipid levels based on the American Heart Association's cholesterol guidelines and lipid reference values.
2 months
Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: 2 months
Percent of patients with abnormal hemoglobin A1c. Abormal values are based on American Diabetes Association (normal <5.7, pre-diabetes 5.7-6.4, diabetes ≥6.5).
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All IPD that underlie results in a publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From start to finish. Anticipated finish date for data collection is December 2027 and publication by mid 2028

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access criteria will be based on those who are involved with the study or have oversight of study. This will include principle investigators, research coordinators, statisticians, IRB, research institute or any monitoring bodies.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Neuropathy With Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Diet

Subscribe