Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients With Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa (HGM) (SYM-HGM)

April 9, 2026 updated by: Felix Horstmann, Knappschaft Kliniken GmbH

Prevalence and Characterization of Dysphagia and Dyspepsia Symptoms and Assessment of Quality of Life in Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa (HGM)

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) in the upper esophagus is associated with swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) in adults undergoing a medically indicated gastroscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is the presence of HGM associated with dysphagia?
  • Is the presence of HGM associated with dyspepsia and reduced health-related quality of life? Among participants reporting dysphagia, what is the distribution of oropharyngeal versus esophageal dysphagia, and is this related to the presence of HGM? If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare participants with endoscopically confirmed HGM to participants without HGM to determine whether dysphagia, dyspepsia symptoms, and quality-of-life measures differ between groups.

Participants will:

Complete pseudonymised questionnaires about dysphagia, dyspepsia symptoms, and quality of life before the gastroscopy.

Undergo the medically indicated gastroscopy as planned; the endoscopist will assess whether HGM is present based on the endoscopic appearance, and routine endoscopy findings will be documented.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) consists of islands of gastric-type mucosa located in the proximal esophagus, typically just below the upper esophageal sphincter. HGM is frequently detected incidentally during upper GI endoscopy, and its clinical relevance remains incompletely understood. Retrospective data suggest that HGM may be associated with symptoms such as dysphagia and dyspepsia; however, prospective data and information on health-related quality of life are limited.

This is a prospective, observational, single-center study conducted in adults (≥18 years) undergoing clinically indicated gastroscopy for any indication. The primary objective is to investigate the association between HGM and dysphagia. Secondary objectives are to evaluate associations between HGM and dyspepsia and impairment of quality of life, and to differentiate oropharyngeal versus esophageal dysphagia. An additional exploratory objective is to assess whether symptom patterns vary by histological subtype when histology is available from routine care.

After informed consent, participants complete paper-based, pseudonymised questionnaires prior to endoscopy (estimated completion time ~30-45 minutes). Oropharyngeal dysphagia is assessed using the Sydney Swallowing Questionnaire (SSQ, German version), and esophageal dysphagia using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10, German version). Dysphagia-related quality of life is assessed with the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI, German validated version/D-ADI). Dyspepsia symptom burden and related quality of life are assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD). The endoscopist is blinded to questionnaire results. During routine gastroscopy, the proximal esophagus is carefully inspected (preferably using Narrow Band Imaging) and the presence or absence of HGM is documented; participants are assigned to HGM or control (no HGM) groups. No additional procedures are mandated by the study; routine endoscopy and any clinically indicated histology are recorded as available.

Data are collected and stored in pseudonymised form and analyzed statistically (planned recruitment period ~12 months). The anticipated total sample size is 731 participants.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

721

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults (≥18 years) undergoing clinically indicated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (gastroscopy) at a single center will be consecutively screened and invited to participate over a 12-month period. After informed consent, participants complete symptom and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires prior to endoscopy. During routine gastroscopy, the presence or absence of heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) in the proximal esophagus is assessed based on endoscopic appearance (and histology from routine care if available). Participants are grouped as HGM present vs no HGM for comparative analyses.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Planned upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (gastroscopy) for clinical reasons (any indication)
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Written informed consent
  • Ability to complete the study questionnaires prior to endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously known heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM)
  • Previously diagnosed dysphagia with prior therapeutic intervention (including pre-established diet modification, partial oral/enteral nutrition, steroid therapy, botulinum toxin injection, etc.)
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Presence of a tracheostomy
  • Inadequate endoscopic assessability of the proximal esophagus, including:
  • General condition insufficient for careful endoscopic inspection (investigator's judgement)
  • Increased risk of aspiration
  • Inadequate visibility during the procedure (e.g., bleeding, food residue)
  • Complications preventing careful inspection of the proximal esophagus
  • History of surgery involving the pharynx or esophagus
  • Relevant severe neurological disorder (e.g., ALS, stroke)
  • Severe dementia
  • Severe depressive disorder
  • Lack of cooperation / inability to comply with study procedures
  • Planned PEG placement
  • Emergency endoscopy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
HGM present
Participants with endoscopic evidence of heterotrophic gastric mucosa
No HGM
Participants without endoscopic evidence of heterotrophic gastric mucosa

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dysphagia Symptom Burdon (EAT-10 und SSQ)
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)
Dysphagia symptom burden is assessed using two patient-reported questionnaires completed prior to medically indicated gastroscopy: (1) the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ/SSQ-G) and (2) the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10). The SSQ total score ranges from 0 to 1700 (higher scores indicate worse swallowing-related symptoms); for descriptive/binary analyses, an SSQ-G total score >234 is considered outside the normative range (pathological). The EAT-10 total score ranges from 0 to 40 (10 items scored 0-4; higher scores indicate greater dysphagia burden); an EAT-10 total score ≥3 is considered abnormal (indicative of dysphagia). Comparative analyses will be performed between participants with endoscopically detected heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) and participants without HGM.
Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HGM & Dyspepsia (GSRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)
Dyspepsia symptom burden assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), a 15-item patient-reported questionnaire referring to symptoms during the past week. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (no discomfort) to 7 (very severe discomfort); higher scores indicate worse symptoms. GSRS domain scores (mean of items within the domain) will be analyzed, focusing on the Indigestion and Abdominal Pain domains as dyspepsia-related measures. As there is no universally defined clinical cut-off for GSRS, a score ≥4 (at least moderate symptom severity) may be used for descriptive/binary analyses. Comparison between participants with endoscopically detected HGM vs participants without HGM.
Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)
Type of Dysphagia (Oropharyngeal vs Esophageal)
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)
Classification of dysphagia phenotype as oropharyngeal versus esophageal based on participant-reported symptom patterns captured in the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ/SSQ-G) and the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10), completed prior to medically indicated gastroscopy. The distribution of dysphagia type (oropharyngeal vs esophageal) will be compared between participants with endoscopically detected heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) and participants without HGM. Abnormal dysphagia symptom burden is defined as SSQ-G total score >234 and/or EAT-10 total score ≥3.
Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is assessed using two disease-specific patient-reported questionnaires completed prior to medically indicated gastroscopy: (1) the German version of the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI-D / A-ADI) to quantify swallowing-related quality of life, and (2) the German version of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire (QOLRAD) to quantify reflux/dyspepsia-related quality of life. The MDADI-D/A-ADI composite score is linearly transformed to a scale of 20-100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing-related HRQoL; for descriptive/binary analyses, MDADI-D/A-ADI composite score <60 may be considered poor (moderate-to-severe impairment). QOLRAD items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1-7), with lower scores indicating worse HRQoL; domain scores (mean of items within each domain) and/or an overall mean score will be analyzed. As there is no universally established clinical cut-off for QOLRAD, a pragmatic threshold of QOL
Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 24, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. Only aggregated results will be published; data access is restricted due to data protection requirements and the wording of the informed consent.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dyspepsia

Subscribe