Decentralized Imaging by REmote Computer Tomography for Cerebral Infarct Thrombolysis (DIRECT-CT)

April 10, 2026 updated by: University Hospital of North Norway

Remote Controlled CT Scanning for Decentralized Diagnostics and Treatment Versus Standard Care in Acute Stroke

The DIRECT-CT trial is designed to test the hypothesis that remote controlled CT scanning combined with real time audio-and video conference (AVC) guided assessment from an experienced hospital stroke team (tele-stroke) at decentralized medical centers (DMC) reduces time to intravenous thrombolytic treatment compared to the standard pathway.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) treatment is an effective treatment of disabling acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and leads to improved functional outcomes if administered within 4.5 hours after symptom onset. Since the treatment effect is highly time dependent, it is recommended to give IVT as soon as possible after symptom onset to patients with AIS without contraindications. A CT examination of the head must be performed prior to IVT to exclude intracranial hemorrhage. If an intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is detected rapid blood pressure lowering medication should be initiated. As of today, timely delivery of acute stroke treatment is challenging in several parts of Norway due to sparsely populated areas with long geographical distances between hospitals. Patients living in rural areas are at risk of not receiving timely acute stroke treatment. Due to the time sensitive nature of IVT, a decentralized approach to diagnostics and treatment is compelling. However, a CT scanner and medical expertise on acute stroke diagnostics and treatment is not readily available in pre-hospital settings in Norway. Investigators therefore plan to 1) assess the feasibility of widespread implementation of a model with decentralized stroke diagnostics and treatment in rural areas with a stationary CT combined with audio-and video guided support from an experienced stroke team at the local hospital 2) compare treatment access, time metrics and outcomes for stroke patients in the DMC catchment area to patients from similar rural areas without access to decentralized diagnostics and treatment. The risk for patients is minimized through remote controlled CT scanning administered from the local hospital combined with tele-stroke guided assessment by an experienced stroke team and regular simulation trainings. All treatment, including thrombolytic therapy, and monitoring routines are performed according to the hospitals' standard operating procedures (SOP). The primary objective is to compare time from Emergency Medical Communication (EMC) notification to IVT treatment between AIS patients in the intervention group comprising patients from geographical areas with an established service of prehospital stroke diagnostics and treatment at the DMC to the control group comprising patients from similar geographical areas undergoing diagnostics and treatment at their local hospital as per standard pathway.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients in the catchments areas of the intervention and control group presenting with a clinical suspected diagnosis of stroke within symptom onset within the last 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients presenting with a clinical suspected diagnosis of stroke more than 24 hours after symptom onset

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention arm
Participants are patients presenting with acute stroke symptoms in rural districts in Norway. A cockpit solution by Syngo Virtual Cockpit® software for remote control of the stationary CT machine at the DMCs from the nearest stroke center is implemented. The EMC center routes the ambulance to DMC Midt-Troms when it is the nearest. A nurse at DMC and the ambulance personnel performs the clinical examination and positions the patient in the CT machine. Through AVC the examination is overseen by the stroke physician, images are interpreted by a radiologist at UNN, and the decision regarding acute treatment is made by the stroke physician at UNN, Tromsø. If indicated, IVT and blood pressure lowering medication is administered by the nurse at the DMC. Patients resenting with acute stroke symptoms in the catchment area of DMC Midt-Troms (Sørreisa and Senja municipalities) and DMC Sør-Helgeland (Brønnøy and Sømna municipalities) comprise the intervention group.
The intervention includes admittance to the DMC for initial diagnostic work up and acute treatment (if indicated). Paramedics examine the patient and assess stroke severity by NIHSS and G-FAST scoring overseen by a stroke physician at the local hospital through real time video conference. A remote controlled CT scan of the head is conducted, and the stroke team at the local hospital evaluates results and makes a treatment decision in real-time AVC. If treatment is indicated, this is administered by local personnel at the DMC before initiating transport to the local hospital or the comprehensive stroke center in case of LVO. Patients who are unable to reach the DMC prior to estimated admission time at their local hospital, will be treated at their local hospital as per standard pathway.
Other Names:
  • Prehospital diagnostics and treatment
No Intervention: Control
1) Patients presenting with acute stroke symptoms residing in municipalities in Nord-Troms (Nordreisa, Kåfjord, Skjervøy and Kvænangen) and Nordland (Saltdal, Hamarøy, Steigen and Sørfold) from the time of DMC model implementation until end of study. These patients are from areas that are geographically similar to Midt-Troms and Sør-Helgeland with regards to distance to the nearest hospital, but without access to prehospital CT diagnostics and acute stroke treatment.
No Intervention: Historical control
This control group consists of acute stroke patients from the same municipalities (both intervention and control group) presenting with stroke symptoms within a 5 year period prior to the implementation of prehospital diagnostics and treatment at the DMC.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from EMC notification to initiation IVT treatment
Time Frame: Day 0
The time from Emergency Medical Communication notification to initiation intravenous thrombolysis treatment in eligible patients
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from admittance to initiation of IVT treatment (door-to-needle time)
Time Frame: Day 0
Time from admittance to initiation of IVT treatment (door-to-needle time) in eligible patients
Day 0
Time from admittance to start of blood pressure lowering medication in ICH patients
Time Frame: Day 0
Time from admittance to start of blood pressure lowering medication in ICH patients patients
Day 0
Proportion of AIS patients receiving IVT treatment (y/n)
Time Frame: Day 0
Proportion of acute ischaemic stroke patients receiving IVT treatment (y/n)
Day 0
Proportion of AIS patients receiving EVT treatment (y/n)
Time Frame: Day 0
Proportion of acute ischaemic stroke patients receiving endovascular treatment
Day 0
Proportion of patients achieving early neurological improvement
Time Frame: Day 1
Early neurological improvement, defined as a reduction of ≥8 points on the NHISS, or NIHSS score of 0-1 at 24 hours (22-36 h) (y/n)
Day 1
mRS score at 90 days
Time Frame: Month 3

functional outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) at discharge and day 90 (± 2 weeks)

• mRS category at day 90 (+/- 2 weeks)

  • excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) at day 90 (+/- 2 weeks)
  • good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) at day 90 (+/- 2weeks)
  • poor functional outcome (mRS 5-6) at day 90 (+/- 2 weeks)
Month 3
Proportion of patients with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH)
Time Frame: Day 1
Proportion of patients with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) complications defined as intracranial hemorrhage on CT/MRI within 36 hours post IVT causally related to an increase of 4 points or more on the NIHSS (y/n)
Day 1
Time from symptom onset to groin puncture time
Time Frame: Day 0
Time from symptom onset to groin puncture time in patients undergoing thrombectomy
Day 0
Transportation mode (ground or air ambulance)
Time Frame: Day 0
Transportation mode to primary or comprehensive stroke centre
Day 0
Mortality
Time Frame: Year 1
Mortality during hospitalization, 30 days, 90 days and 1 year
Year 1
Final diagnosis
Time Frame: Week 2
The final discharge diagnosis
Week 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Decentralized diagnostics and treatment

Subscribe