Probiotic and Synbiotic Supplements in Hemodialysis Patients

April 11, 2026 updated by: Hagar Magdy Abd El-Aziz Farag, Mansoura University

Effects of Probiotic and Synbiotic Administration on the Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics of Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This single-center randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of natural probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on clinical and biochemical characteristics in adults with end-stage renal disease receiving maintenance hemodialysis at the Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt. Participants were randomized into three groups (control, probiotic, and synbiotic), with supplementation given for 6 months in the intervention groups. The study assessed changes in uremic toxins (including p-cresyl sulfate) as the primary outcome, and cardiovascular parameters, quality of life, and cognitive function as secondary outcomes. The trial aimed to determine whether modulation of gut microbiota with probiotics or synbiotics can improve outcomes in hemodialysis patients

Study Overview

Detailed Description

End-stage renal disease patients receiving hemodialysis commonly have intestinal dysbiosis and accumulation of gut-derived uremic toxins. Probiotic and synbiotic supplementation may help modulate gut microbiota and reduce uremic toxin burden, but direct comparative data between probiotic and synbiotic strategies in hemodialysis patients are limited. This study was designed to assess the effects of natural probiotic and synbiotic administration on the clinical and biochemical characteristics and uremic toxin levels of hemodialysis patients at the Urology and Nephrology Center (UNC), Mansoura University, Egypt.

This was a single-center randomized controlled trial with single-blind allocation. Sixty adult patients with end-stage renal disease on regular hemodialysis were included (dropout-inflated sample size; calculated minimum sample size was 48). Participants were randomized into three groups: a control group (20 patients), a probiotic group (20 patients), and a synbiotic group (20 patients). The probiotic and synbiotic groups received supplementation for 6 months; the synbiotic intervention included natural probiotic supplementation combined with prebiotic fibers (oat). Regular hemodialysis was standardized during the trial (3 sessions/week, 4 hours/session).

The primary outcome was the effect of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on uremic toxin levels, including p-cresyl sulfate. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular-related parameters and comorbid clinical measures, including body mass index, anemia/ESA resistance, quality of life, and cognitive function. Assessments included laboratory testing (biochemical parameters and uremic toxins), echocardiographic evaluation by blinded cardiologists, and psychological assessment using cognitive testing (MOCA) and quality-of-life evaluation (KDQOL-36).

The completed thesis reports that both probiotic and synbiotic supplementation reduced serum p-cresyl sulfate compared with control, with a more pronounced reduction in the synbiotic group, and that some cardiovascular and quality-of-life parameters improved, while cognitive and other secondary outcomes were less pronounced. Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups, supporting successful randomization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia Governorate
      • Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt, 35111
        • Urology and Nephrology Center (UNC), Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • End-stage renal disease patients on regular maintenance hemodialysis
  • Not under active preparation for kidney transplantation within the next year (i.e., not planned for transplantation for more than one year)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Under active preparation for kidney transplantation
  • Pregnancy
  • Active malignancy
  • Known structural gastrointestinal tract disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control (Standard Hemodialysis Care)
Participants received standard maintenance hemodialysis care without probiotic or synbiotic supplementation for the study period.
Experimental: Probiotic Supplementation
Participants received natural probiotic supplementation in addition to standard maintenance hemodialysis care for 6 months.
Oral natural probiotic supplementation was administered in addition to standard maintenance hemodialysis care for 6 months.
Experimental: Synbiotic Supplementation
Participants received synbiotic supplementation (natural probiotic plus prebiotic fiber [oat]) in addition to standard maintenance hemodialysis care for 6 months.
Oral synbiotic supplementation (natural probiotic plus prebiotic fiber [oat]) was administered in addition to standard maintenance hemodialysis care for 6 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Serum p-Cresyl Sulfate (PCS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Serum p-cresyl sulfate level is measured in blood. Outcome is the change from baseline to the end of the intervention.
Baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Life (Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) questionnaire. Scores are reported for the KDQOL-36 subscales: Symptom/Problem List (0-100), Effects of Kidney Disease (0-100), and Burden of Kidney Disease (0-100), and the generic health components derived from the SF-12 (Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary). For the 0-100 KDQOL-36 subscales, higher scores indicate better quality of life (fewer symptoms/less burden). The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Cognitive Function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening test of global cognitive function. Total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. Outcome is a change in the MoCA total score from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Left ventricular ejection fraction measured by transthoracic echocardiography. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months. A higher percentage indicates better systolic function.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume measured by transthoracic echocardiography. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Left ventricular end-systolic volume measured by transthoracic echocardiography. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Left ventricular mass index measured by transthoracic echocardiography. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Blood urea nitrogen is measured in blood. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Serum Creatinine
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Serum creatinine is measured in blood. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Serum Potassium
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Serum potassium is measured in blood. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Serum Phosphorus
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Serum phosphorus is measured in blood. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Hemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Hemoglobin is measured on a complete blood count. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the dataset contains sensitive clinical information collected for a single-center academic thesis, and consent and local ethics approval did not include public IPD sharing. Aggregate results will be reported in the thesis and related publications.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemodialysis

Clinical Trials on Natural Probiotic Supplement

Subscribe