Hip-allograft In Proximal Humerus Fractures Versus Plate Implantation Alone: a Randomized Controlled Trial (HIPPI)

April 13, 2026 updated by: Tergooi Medical Center
Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are common osteoporotic fractures in adults and the elderly, leading to significant disability and reduced quality of life. Current treatment options for displaced PHFs include locking plate fixation (LCP) and various augmentation techniques, but there is no consensus on the optimal treatment. Although, femoral allografts have shown promising results, there is a need for more definitive evidence regarding the utilization of femoral graft augmentation in addition to locking plate fixation in 3- and 4-part PHFs. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using a mushroom-shaped femoral allograft combined with LCP fixation compared to LCP fixation alone. We hypothesize that femoral allograft augmentation with LCP fixation will result in better clinical and functional outcomes than LCP fixation alone at 24 months post-operative

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are common osteoporotic fractures in adults and the elderly, leading to significant disability and reduced quality of life. Current treatment options for displaced PHFs include locking plate fixation (LCP) and various augmentation techniques, but there is no consensus on the optimal treatment. Although, femoral allografts have shown promising results, there is a need for more definitive evidence regarding the utilization of femoral graft augmentation in addition to locking plate fixation in 3- and 4-part PHFs.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using a mushroom-shaped femoral allograft combined with LCP fixation compared to LCP fixation alone. We hypothesize that femoral allograft augmentation with LCP fixation will result in better clinical and functional outcomes than LCP fixation alone at 24 months post-operative.

Objective:

Primary Objective: To compare the CMS between patients treated with LCP fixation plus femoral allograft and those treated with LCP fixation alone at 24 months. The CMS is a validated tool used for assessing overall shoulder function, incorporating bothsubjective and objective components.

Secondary Objectives: To assess differences in clinical outcomes (using Oxford Shoulder Score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Numeric Rating Scale, EQ-5DL), radiological outcomes (humeral head height, humeral neck shaft angle), and the incidence of complications at 24 months.

Study design: This is a single-center, prospective, single-blind, two-armed, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) to be conducted at Tergooi MC. The study will span a maximum of 48 months, including 24 months for patient recruitment and 24 months for follow-up.

Study population: The study will enroll adults aged 40-70 years presenting with acute (≤3 weeks) three- or four-part PHFs Intervention: Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (LCP fixation plus femoral allograft) or the control group (LCP fixation alone).

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter will be the CMS score at 24 months.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participation in this study involves no additional burden compared to standard care at Tergooi MC. The study uses routine shoulder function assessments already part of the follow-up protocol, with no extra hospital visits, invasive procedures, or questionnaires required. The risks associated with the investigational treatments are minimal, similar to those observed in previous studies on fibular and femoral allografts. The use of allografts carries potential risks, such as infection and immune reactions, but these are minimized through careful donor selection and screening. Bone allografting is gen-erally safe, though risks like infection, bleeding, and impaired healing remain. Hospitalization and mortality risks are very low. The procedure aims to improve stability and reduce complications, supported by existing literature

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Dominique C Baas, PhD
  • Phone Number: +31887535153
  • Email: dbaas@tergooi.nl

Study Locations

      • Hilversum, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Tergooi Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between 40 and 70 years
  • Presenting with acute (< 3 weeks) 3- or 4-part PHF (NEER classification) Be able to understand and communicate in Dutch; Patient must be competent to make decisions; Patient is willing and able to complete scheduled study procedures Provide written IC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Head-split fractures;
  • Pathological fractures due to malignancy or metastases;
  • Individuals diagnosed with dementia or residing in institutional care or other cognitive impairment;
  • Terminal illness; Patients with convulsive disorders, collagen diseases, and any other condition that might affect the mobility of the shoulder joint; Active joint or systemic infection; History of prior surgery on the same shoulder; Previous fracture in the same shoulder; Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Locking plate fixation alone
Experimental: Intervention
Locking plate fixation with femoral allograft augmentation
Locking plate fixation with femoral allograft augmentation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant Murley Score
Time Frame: 24 months
Change in Constant Murley Score
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oxford Shoulder Score
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Oxford Shoulder Score
6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
NRS
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
NRS
6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
EQ-5D
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
EQ-5D
6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
SSV
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
SSV
6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura M. Kok, MD, PhD, Tergooi Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R24.102
  • NL88103.100.24 (Other Identifier: MEC-U)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Supporting data when the request is reasonable

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning after publication with no end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Anyone will be able to access the qualitative supportive data via an online data repository.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Proximal Humeral Fractures

Clinical Trials on Locking plate fixation with femoral allograft augmentation

Subscribe