Effect of Local Subperiosteal Zoledronic Acid Injection on the Survival of Orthodontic Miniscrews

April 16, 2026 updated by: Shadi Moawad, Latakia University

Background: Orthodontic miniscrews are widely used as temporary anchorage devices; however, failure remains a clinical concern. Bisphosphonates may enhance bone stability, but evidence on their local application is limited.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of local subperiosteal zoledronic acid (ZA) injection on miniscrew survival and peri-miniscrew inflammation.

Materials and Methods: This triple-blind, split-mouth randomized controlled trial included 68 patients requiring bilateral maxillary premolar extraction. Miniscrews were placed bilaterally, with one side randomly receiving a 0.5 mL solution of zoledronic acid at 1 mg/mL concentration and the contralateral side saline. Injections were administered weekly for three weeks. Orthodontic force (~250 g) was applied 24 hours after final injection. The primary outcome was miniscrew survival at 6 months. Paired comparisons were analyzed using McNemar test, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anchorage in orthodontics refers to resistance against unwanted tooth movements during treatment. Numerous methods and devices have been utilized over time to reinforce anchorage. Although effective, these traditional techniques present certain limitations.

Recently, mini-implants, or temporary anchorage devices (TADs), have gained popularity as reliable tools for facilitating controlled tooth movement without relying on patient compliance. Nonetheless, miniscrews can encounter complications including mobility and failure during treatment. Clinically, miniscrew success is generally assessed by absence of inflammation, mobility, or significant pain, along with their capacity to withstand orthodontic forces. A systematic review and meta-analysis estimated that TAD failure occurs in approximately 13.5% of cases, with mandibular placements showing a higher failure rate (16.5%) compared to maxillary ones (11.0%).

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are synthetic compounds analogous to pyrophosphates.They are mainly prescribed to manage excessive bone resorption associated with skeletal disorders, primarily by modulating bone remodeling and repair.

The biological effects of bisphosphonates can be categorized into:

  • Tissue level: BPs reduce bone turnover, thereby diminishing both bone resorption and formation.
  • Cellular level: Osteoclasts are the primary targets, with bisphosphonates inhibiting their recruitment, suppressing activity, shortening lifespan, and modifying bone mineral properties to slow dissolution independently of cellular processes.

In oral surgery, bisphosphonates have been studied for their influence on implant osseointegration. Clinical trials in humans have reported similar improvements in implant stability and reductions in marginal bone loss. In orthodontics, bisphosphonates have shown promising results by significantly reducing root resorption, maintaining anchorage, and inhibiting osteoclast formation triggered by orthodontic forces, ultimately slowing tooth movement in experimental models. Recent evidence suggests that localized delivery of bisphosphonates is a beneficial adjunct to orthodontic therapy.35 Among bisphosphonates, zoledronic acid (ZA) is recognized as the most potent agent in clinical practice. A single intraoperative dose has shown positive outcomes in multiple bone healing and regeneration models.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Latakia Governorate
      • Latakia, Latakia Governorate, Syria
        • Latakia university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild to moderate skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion with full-cusp Class II molar relationship, ANB angle between 4° and 6°, normal maxilla-mandibular plane angle (25° ± 5°), and indication for first premolar extraction to reduce overjet.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Periodontal disease or alveolar bone loss.
  • Craniofacial deformities.
  • Cleft lip or palate.
  • Impacted or missing teeth in the treatment area.
  • Systemic diseases or current medication affecting bone metabolism.
  • Poor gingival health.
  • Smoking or inadequate oral hygiene.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention (Zoledronic Acid)
zoledronic acid administered miniscrews

Zoledronic acid was prepared at a concentration of 1 mg/mL according to the manufacturer's instructions (ADMAC Pharmaceuticals). A volume of 0.5 mL was injected subperiosteally adjacent to miniscrews on the experimental side.

Dose calculation was based on conversion from animal studies using the human equivalent dose (HED) formula.39,40 The calculated HED was 0.0216 mg/kg, corresponding to approximately 1.296 mg for a 60-kg individual.

One week after placement, injections were administered weekly for three consecutive sessions.

Other Names:
  • Bisphosphonate
Placebo Comparator: Placebo / Saline Group
saline administered miniscrews
Three local subperiosteal injections of sterile 0.9% saline solution were administered at the orthodontic miniscrew insertion sites, beginning one week after placement and repeated at weekly intervals for three consecutive sessions, serving as an inert control without pharmacological effect.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mobility
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of orthodontic miniscrews with no clinical mobility during follow-up, assessed by manual clinical examination
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peri-miniscrew inflammation
Time Frame: 6 months
assessed using a 3-point index: (0) healthy; (1) mucositis; (2) peri-implantitis with mobility and failure
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shadi G Moawad, Ph.D, Assistant Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Feldmann I, Bondemark L. Orthodontic anchorage: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2006;76:493-501.
  • Ganzer N, Feldmann I, Bondemarkc L. Anchorage reinforcement with miniscrews and molar blocks in adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;154:758-67
  • Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Lee JW, Kim SH, Kim TW. Survival analysis of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:194-9
  • Moghaddam S, Mohammadi A, Behroozian A. The effect of sandblasting and acid etching on survival rate of orthodontic miniscrews: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Progress in Orthodontics 2021; 22:2.
  • Kloehn SJ. Orthodontics-force or persuasion. Angle Orthod 1953; 23:55-65

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 3, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Clinical Trials on Zoledronic Acid

Subscribe