PRP vs PRP+Betamethasone vs Betamethasone Injection for Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain (UMAY-RCT)

May 20, 2026 updated by: Utku Gürhan, University of Kyrenia

Comparison of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Combined Platelet-Rich Plasma Plus Betamethasone, and Betamethasone Monotherapy Trigger Point Injections in Patients With Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Assessor-Blind, Controlled Trial

Brief Summary

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by active trigger points (TrPs), which are hypersensitive, painful nodules within taut bands of skeletal muscle. The upper trapezius muscle is one of the most frequently affected sites. Trigger point injection (TPI) is a widely used minimally invasive treatment for patients who are refractory to conservative management.

Corticosteroids provide rapid anti-inflammatory effects, whereas platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has regenerative properties through growth factors that may support tissue healing. Despite their widespread use, the optimal injectate for TPI remains unclear. Additionally, the potential benefit of combining PRP with corticosteroids has not been adequately studied in upper trapezius MPS.

This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded controlled trial designed to compare the clinical effectiveness of three injection protocols: (1) PRP plus bupivacaine, (2) PRP plus betamethasone plus bupivacaine, and (3) betamethasone plus bupivacaine with saline (volume-matched control). A total of 150 patients with a single active trigger point in the upper trapezius will be included.

The primary outcome is pain intensity measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include pressure pain threshold (PPT), cervical range of motion (ROM), rescue analgesic use, recurrence rate, and adverse events at 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.

All injections are performed by the same investigator using a palpation-guided technique, and outcome assessments are conducted by a blinded evaluator.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study Design

This is a single-center, prospective, three-arm randomized controlled trial. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated block randomization method (block size: 6, allocation ratio 1:1:1) with sealed opaque envelopes. Patients and outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation. The injecting physician will not be blinded due to the nature of PRP preparation.

Interventions

Group A (PRP group):

2 mL autologous leukocyte-poor PRP + 1 mL bupivacaine 0.5% (total 3 mL)

Group B (Combination group):

1 mL PRP + 1 mL bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 mL betamethasone (total 3 mL)

Group C (Control group):

1 mL betamethasone + 1 mL bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 mL normal saline (total 3 mL)

All groups receive equal injection volumes to avoid volume-related bias.

PRP Preparation

Ten milliliters of peripheral venous blood will be collected into a citrate-containing tube. The first centrifugation will be performed at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes, followed by a second centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 10 minutes. One milliliter of leukocyte-poor PRP will be obtained. No activator will be used. The preparation will be applied within 30 minutes. Platelet concentration and preparation parameters will be recorded.

Injection Technique

Trigger point injections will be performed using a palpation-guided technique without ultrasound assistance. A 25G needle will be inserted at approximately 30 degrees into the trigger point. Local twitch response will be documented during the procedure.

Outcome Assessments

Baseline (T0):

VAS, PPT (algometer), cervical ROM (digital goniometer)

1 week (T1): VAS, PPT, adverse events 4 weeks (T2): VAS, PPT, ROM, rescue analgesic use 3 months (T3 - Primary endpoint): VAS, PPT, ROM, rescue analgesic use, patient satisfaction 6 months (T4): VAS, PPT, ROM, recurrence evaluation, patient satisfaction Statistical Analysis

The primary analysis will be conducted using repeated measures ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction. Post hoc comparisons will be performed using Tukey HSD with Bonferroni adjustment. Intention-to-treat analysis will be applied. Missing data will be handled using multiple imputation. A per-protocol analysis will be performed as a sensitivity analysis. Recurrence rates will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank testing. Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS version 26.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Kyrenia, Cyprus, 6000
        • Recruiting
        • Dr. Suat Gunsel University of Kyrenia Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Keryneia
      • Kyrenia, Keryneia, Cyprus, 6000
        • Recruiting
        • Dr. Suat Gunsel University of Kyrenia Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Presentation to the Orthopedics and Traumatology outpatient clinic with neck and/or shoulder pain
  • Diagnosis of upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome based on Simons and Travell criteria, including:
  • Presence of a taut band
  • Local tenderness
  • Referred pain pattern
  • Local twitch response
  • Presence of a single active trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle
  • Symptom duration ≥ 4 weeks
  • Pain intensity ≥ 4 on the visual analog scale (VAS)
  • Inadequate response to at least 4 weeks of conservative treatment (physical therapy and/or oral analgesics)
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of multiple active trigger points
  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia according to ACR 2010 criteria
  • Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
  • Trigger point injection in the same region within the past 3 months
  • Coagulopathy or current anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy
  • Known allergy or contraindication to corticosteroids, local anesthetics, or PRP components
  • Active infection (systemic or local)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100,000/µL)
  • Malignancy
  • Inability to cooperate or provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRP Trigger Point Injection
Single palpation-guided trigger point injection in upper trapezius: 2 mL autologous leukocyte-poor PRP + 1 mL bupivacaine 0.5%. Total volume: 3 mL. Single session.
2 mL autologous leukocyte-poor PRP prepared by double centrifugation, combined with 1 mL bupivacaine 0.5%. Single palpation-guided trigger point injection into upper trapezius. Total volume: 3 mL
Experimental: Combined PRP and Betamethasone Injection
Single palpation-guided trigger point injection: 1 mL PRP + 1 mL bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 mL Diprospan (betamethasone). Total volume: 3 mL. Single session.
1 mL autologous LP-PRP + 1 mL Diprospan (betamethasone dipropionate 5 mg + betamethasone sodium phosphate 2 mg) + 1 mL bupivacaine 0.5%. Single palpation-guided trigger point injection. Total volume: 3 mL
Active Comparator: Betamethasone Trigger Point Injection
Single palpation-guided trigger point injection: 1 mL Diprospan (betamethasone) + 1 mL bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 mL normal saline (volume equalization). Total volume: 3 mL. Single session.
1 mL Diprospan (betamethasone dipropionate 5 mg + betamethasone sodium phosphate 2 mg) + 1 mL bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 mL normal saline (0.9% NaCl, volume equalization). Single palpation-guided trigger point injection. Total volume: 3 mL.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Pain intensity measured on a 10-cm horizontal Visual Analog Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Assessed by a blinded evaluator separate from the injecting physician. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID): 1.5 cm.
Baseline to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Pain intensity on 10-cm horizontal VAS assessed by blinded evaluator. Long-term durability of effect.
Baseline to 6 months
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 1, week 4, month 3, month 6
Measured by digital algometer (kg/cm²) directly over the active trigger point. Mean of 3 consecutive measurements by blinded evaluator.
Baseline, week 1, week 4, month 3, month 6
Cervical Range of Motion (ROM
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4, month 3, month 6
Flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation measured in degrees using a digital goniometer by blinded evaluator.
Baseline, week 4, month 3, month 6
Rescue Analgesic Consumption
Time Frame: Through 6 months
Number of paracetamol 500 mg tablets consumed per week recorded by patient diary.
Through 6 months
Recurrence Rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of patients whose VAS score returns to ≥50% of baseline value within 6-month follow-up.
6 months
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Month 3, Month 6
5-point Likert scale (1=very satisfied, 5=very dissatisfied) assessed by blinded evaluator.
Month 3, Month 6
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through 6 months
Incidence of injection site reactions, vasovagal syncope, systemic corticosteroid effects, and infection.
Through 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trigger Points, Myofascial

Clinical Trials on Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)

Subscribe