Enarodustat + CsA vs CsA in Newly Diagnosed TD-NSAA

April 16, 2026 updated by: Bing Han, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of Enarodustat Combined With Cyclosporine Versus Cyclosporine Monotherapy in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed TD-NSAA

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of enarodustat combined with cyclosporine versus cyclosporine monotherapy in the treatment of newly-diagnosed tansfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia (TD-NSAA).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years old;
  2. Diagnosed with aplastic anemia (AA) through routine blood tests, bone marrow puncture, bone marrow biopsy, and exclusion tests, and determined as transfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia (TD NSAA) according to the Camitta criteria; Hemoglobin<90g/L;
  3. Had no HLA-matched donors or was not suitable for first-line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT);
  4. With baseline liver and kidney functions <2 ULN;
  5. ECOG score ≤ 2;
  6. Signed the informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Had other primary or secondary bone marrow failure (BMF) diseases, such as Fanconi anemia, congenital keratinization disorder, etc.;
  2. With evidence of clonal hematological bone marrow diseases (MDS, AML) in cytogenetics;
  3. PNH clone ≥ 50%;
  4. Received HSCT before enrollment;
  5. Previously used immunosuppressive treatments such as ATG, CsA, TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), roxadustat;
  6. Allergic or intolerant to enarodustat or CsA;
  7. Pregnant or lactating patients;
  8. Severe bleeding or infection that cannot be controlled by standard treatment;
  9. Complicated with malignant tumors;
  10. Participated in other clinical trials within 3 months;
  11. Patients considered not suitable to participate in this study by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CsA+Enarodustat
CsA 3-5mg/kg/d Enarodustat 8mg qd
Enarodustat 8mg qd
CsA 3-5mg/kg/d, trough concentration 100-200ng/ml
Active Comparator: CsA
CsA 3-5mg/kg/d
CsA 3-5mg/kg/d, trough concentration 100-200ng/ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ORR
Time Frame: 6-month
ORR=CRR+PRR
6-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RBC-TI rate
Time Frame: 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Proportion of patients who achieve red blood cell transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer
3-month, 6-month, 12-month
hemoglobin response rate
Time Frame: 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Proportion of patients with hemoglobin response
3-month, 6-month, 12-month
AE rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
According to CTCAE, the proportion of patients with adverse events (AEs)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
ORR
Time Frame: 3-month, 12-month
ORR=CRR+PRR
3-month, 12-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transfusion-dependent Non-severe Aplastic Anemia

Clinical Trials on Enarodustat

Subscribe