Adaptive Decision Support for Addiction Treatment (ADAPT) Serial Randomized Testing for Usability, Round 1

May 29, 2026 updated by: Yale University

Adaptive Decision Support for Addiction Treatment (ADAPT) Serial Randomized Testing for Usability

This study is stage 2, round 1 of a larger study which refines and optimizes the EMBED clinical decision support (CDS); see NCT03658642 to increase number of ED physicians following standard of care for the administration of buprenorphine to appropriate patients with opioid use disorder.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is stage 2, rapid response testing (RRT), of the optimization phase of a larger study which refines and optimizes the EMBED* clinical decision support (CDS); see NCT03658642 to increase number of ED physicians following standard of care for the administration of buprenorphine to appropriate patients with opioid use disorder. Investigators will use a Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) framework study with preparation, optimization, and confirmatory phases.

In stage 2 optimization phase, investigators will conduct serial rapid-cycle randomized testing to inform iterative refinement of the CDS interface and workflow to minimize user errors, task disruption, and abandonment through identification of specific targets for improvement via application of novel CDS outcome measures with the goal of improving CDS usability.

Five rounds of A-B testing are expected. The more successful condition will be tested in the subsequent round against a novel test condition. In this first round we will test the placement of the nurse prompt to complete COWS randomizing encounters to place the prompt under either required or optional documentation. Future rounds will be planned, with arms and interventions added, as the project progresses in order to build on insights gained in each round.

Phase 3, the evaluation phase, will consist of a randomized trial of the optimized package compared to the original EMBED and the evaluation phase in which investigators will compare the efficacy of the optimized, multicomponent CDS package to the original EMBED CDS on ED-initiation of buprenorphine rates in patients with OUD in a randomized trial.

*EMBED is a user centered, clinician facing clinical decision support system integrated into the electronic health record workflow to facilitate initiating buprenorphine in the emergency department by: diagnosing opioid use disorder with a checklist based on the diagnostic criteria of the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition), assessing the severity of withdrawal with the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS), motivating patients to accept treatment with a scripted brief negotiation interview, and automating the electronic health record workflow, including clinical and after visit documentation, order entry, prescribing, and referral for ongoing treatment in the community

This study does not have open enrollment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

267

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Guilford, Connecticut, United States, 06437
        • Yale New Haven Shoreline Medical Center
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale New Haven Hospital
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale New Haven Hospital- St. Raphael

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency department patient
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Moderate to severe opioid use disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Pregnant
  • Currently receiving medication for opioid use disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Refined EMBED plus nurse prompt to complete COWS placed under required documentation in Epic
Nurse prompt to complete COWS placed under optional documentation in Epic
Nurse receives prompt to complete COWS under required documentation
Refined EMBED CDS
Active Comparator: Refined EMBED CDS
EMBED CDS refined based on previous results
Refined EMBED CDS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of encounters with COWS completed
Time Frame: Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of eligible encounters with a COWS competed, by any team member and via any workflow (internal and external of EMBED). Obtained from EHR data.
Trial round start to end up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of encounters with Buprenorphine initiation in the ED
Time Frame: Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of eligible encounters with buprenorphine administered in the Emergency Department (ED) and/or prescribed buprenorphine on discharge from the ED. Obtained from EHR data.
Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of eligible encounters with CDS engagement
Time Frame: Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of eligible encounters in which any portion of the EMBED workflow was documented or completed.
Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Teamwork on CDS Engagement
Time Frame: Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of eligible encounters in which more than one team member (regardless of role) helped complete the EMBED workflow.
Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of eligible users who used EMBED
Time Frame: Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of EM staff members (Attendings, Residents and APPS) who cared for at least patient for whom the alert fired during the study period who used EMBED at least once during the study period.
Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of encounters in which buprenorphine was ordered through EMBED vs. externally.
Time Frame: Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of eligible encounters in which buprenorphine order is placed through EMBED (i.e., using EMBED order set)
Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Time spent on EMBED
Time Frame: Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Time (in seconds) spent on EMBED overall and by component.
Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of Encounters with OUD Diagnosis Recorded
Time Frame: Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of eligible encounters in which the OUD diagnosis was recorded
Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of Encounters with readiness indicated
Time Frame: Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of eligible encounters with patient readiness indicated
Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of Encounters with buprenorphine order or prescription placed through the EMBED CDS
Time Frame: Trial round start to end up to 3 months
Proportion of Encounters where buprenorphine order or prescription placed through the EMBED CDS
Trial round start to end up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Edward Melnick, MD, MHS, Yale University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000038624-B1
  • 5R33DA059884-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data related to EHR use measurements in various levels of aggregation. e.g., time spent on the CDS or threshold outcomes such as dismissal of the CDS without action under a specific amount of time or the time spent on CDS that exceeds what was expected based on the patient's clinical opioid withdrawal (COWS) score, time in the ED, or level of acuity, patient acuity, chief complaints or diagnoses, clinician, interruptions (such as orders started but not finished), task switching, seasonality, and variation in shift timing (such as nights and weekends). Data shared will include variables relating to patient demographics, medical history, prescription information, clinician facing clinical decision support (CDS) firing and clinician action information, and clinician prescribing decisions and historical prescribing.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified data will be shared with NAHDAP as soon as possible upon completion of quality control procedures, analysis, and at the time of associated publication or end of performance period. Data will be released by NAHDAP at the time of receipt and will be available indefinitely.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified data sets used for analysis will be submitted to NAHDAP through the NIH HEAL Initiative and will be available for public use according to NAHDAP data sharing policies and restrictions set by our DUA with NAHDAP and our IRB. All data submissions to NAHDAP undergo confidentiality review to protect respondents' data from being re-identified.

Portions of the ADAPT intervention will be built for national distribution on the Epic EHR platform. Distribution of code that is proprietary to Epic may limit distribution of certain portions of software or code. In this situation, investigators will provide dashboards and visualizations of workflow diagrams as appropriate to disclose interface and workflow concepts to the broader scientific community These portions of the data will also be subject to restricted use access outside of organizations using Epic.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Nurse prompt to complete COWS under required documentation

Subscribe