Construction and Validation of an Intelligent Ultrasound Diagnostic System for the Spectrum of Neuroblastoma in Children

Construction and Validation of an Intelligent Ultrasound Diagnostic System for the Spectrum of Neuroblastoma in Children: A Multicenter Study

The goal of this observational study is to build an intelligent ultrasound diagnostic system that integrates pathological typing, risk stratification and prognosis assessment. The main question it aims to answer is:

  1. Can the prediction model of neuroblastoma tumors (NTs) in children based on ultrasound images distinguish each pathological subtype?
  2. Can the multimodal fusion model established based on clinical and pathological features identify high-risk patients, predict bone marrow metastasis, and estimate the therapeutic effect?
  3. Can this ultrasound diagnostic system achieve a systematic and intelligent assessment of NTs patients to assist in clinical risk stratification and individualized treatment decisions?

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Neuroblastic tumors (NTs) represent the most common extracranial solid tumors in childhood, with the vast majority of patients diagnosed with neuroblastoma (NB)-the subtype associated with the highest malignancy and poorest prognosis. These cases present significant challenges in clinical diagnosis and management, often leading to unfavorable overall outcomes. Histopathological examination remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis and classification. However, this method is invasive, carries a risk of complications, and its diagnostic accuracy is subject to operator experience and biopsy sampling location. Although medical imaging allows for noninvasive tumor assessment, it primarily relies on subjective visual interpretation by physicians, resulting in limited accuracy and reproducibility in distinguishing between different NT subtypes.

Radiomics, an emerging artificial intelligence-based imaging analysis approach, enables high-throughput extraction, analysis, and quantification of imaging features through automated algorithms, uncovering vast amounts of subvisual information. It has demonstrated considerable promise in the differential diagnosis, treatment evaluation, and outcome prediction of tumors. Current radiomics research on neuroblastoma is still in its early stages, with most studies focusing on modalities such as computerized tomography(CT), magnetic resonance imaging(MRI), and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography(PET-CT), while ultrasound-based radiomics investigations remain unexplored.

Ultrasonography, owing to its unique advantages-including absence of ionizing radiation, real-time dynamic imaging, operational convenience, and low cost-has become the preferred imaging modality for pediatric tumor screening and follow-up. Consequently, integrating radiomics with ultrasonography to develop an intelligent diagnostic system capable of noninvasively and accurately assessing NTs holds significant clinical value and translational potential. Such a system would facilitate precise preoperative classification, patient risk stratification, and support for clinical decision-making.

This study aims to construct and validate an intelligent ultrasound diagnostic system for pediatric neuroblastic tumors based on ultrasound radiomics features, as follows:

  1. To build a prediction model for pediatric neuroblastic tumors (NTs) based on ultrasound images, achieving automated differential diagnosis of neuroblastoma (NB), ganglioneuroblastoma (GNB), and ganglioneuroma (GN).
  2. On the basis of pathological classification, integrate clinical pathological features to establish a multimodal fusion model. The focus is on identifying high-risk patients, predicting bone marrow metastasis, and estimating treatment outcomes, providing a reference basis for clinical decision-making.
  3. Integrate previous research results to construct a comprehensive intelligent ultrasound diagnostic system that integrates pathological classification, risk stratification, and prognosis assessment, achieving systematic and intelligent evaluation of NTs patients to assist in clinical risk stratification and individualized treatment decisions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230041
        • Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital
    • Jiangsu
      • Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, 215008
        • The Children's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University
    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, China, 650100
        • Kunming Children's Hospital
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
        • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
        • The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
      • Wenling, Zhejiang, China, 317500
        • Wenling Institute of Medical Big Data and Artificial Intelligence

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with NTs at the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, the Children's Hospital of Kunming City, and Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital from January 2015 to February 2025.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The diagnosis of NTs was confirmed by surgical resection or biopsy with histopathological examination, and the type was classified as NB, GNB or GN according to the INPC standard.
  2. Age ≤ 18 years old, with no gender restrictions.
  3. There are complete abdominal (or primary site) ultrasound images archived, in original DICOM or JPG format, with image quality meeting the analysis requirements.
  4. Complete clinical and pathological data relevant to the research purpose are available.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient has previously undergone surgical resection treatment in another hospital, but the tumor recurred or remained after the operation.
  2. Poor quality of ultrasound images: There are artifacts that seriously affect the identification of tumor contours or feature extraction, image blurring, or incomplete display of the lesion.
  3. Severe data deficiency: Key clinical pathological data or imaging data are missing, making it impossible to extract and analyze the required information.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
training set
The dataset from the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine is planned to be randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set in a ratio of 7:3.
internal validation set
The dataset from the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine is planned to be randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set in a ratio of 7:3.
independent external validation set
Data from the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Kunming Children's Hospital, and Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital were combined as an independent external validation set.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
F1 score
Time Frame: Within one week after the model training is completed, calculations are conducted respectively on the internal validation set and the independent external validation set.
F1 Score = 2 * (Precision * Recall) / (Precision + Recall)
Within one week after the model training is completed, calculations are conducted respectively on the internal validation set and the independent external validation set.
accuracy rate
Time Frame: Within one week after the model training is completed, performance tests are conducted respectively on the internal validation set and the independent external validation set.
Draw multi-class ROC curves and calculate based on the ROC curves.
Within one week after the model training is completed, performance tests are conducted respectively on the internal validation set and the independent external validation set.
specificity
Time Frame: Within one week after the model training is completed, calculations are conducted respectively on the internal validation set and the independent external validation set.
specificity = (True negative cases / (True negative cases + False positive cases)) * 100%
Within one week after the model training is completed, calculations are conducted respectively on the internal validation set and the independent external validation set.
sensitivity
Time Frame: Within one week after the model training is completed, calculations are conducted respectively on the internal validation set and the independent external validation set.
sensitivity= (True Positive / (True Positive + False Negative))*100%
Within one week after the model training is completed, calculations are conducted respectively on the internal validation set and the independent external validation set.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2026-IRB-0083-P-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuroblastic Tumors

Subscribe