Testing a Peer-Support Group for Veterans Who Hear Voices (VVV RCT)

April 21, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

A Multisited Efficacy Trial of Veteran Voices and Visions

Veterans with schizophrenia spectrum disorders who experience psychosis struggle with social integration- e.g., participation in work, housing, and citizenship-due to symptoms, stigma, and psychosocial functioning deficits. Veteran Voices and Visions (VVV) is a psychosocial, peer-led group intervention for Veterans with psychosis based that reduces distress related to psychosis and fosters a sense of belonging for Veterans living with psychosis. VVV destigmatizes psychosis; reframes symptoms; and introduces personalized, meaningful coping strategies enabling social interaction. The investigators will assess VVV's efficacy in a trial comparing recipients of VVV to another peer-led group, Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP), on outcomes of distress from psychosis, sense of belonging, and social functioning while identifying contextual factors regarding implementation at two sites. The investigators hypothesize that proximal reduction in distress and increased sense of belonging results in improvements in social functioning.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Veterans have a higher prevalence than non-Veterans of Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSD). These Veterans often struggle with social integration-e.g., participation in work, housing, and citizenship-due to symptoms, stigma, and psychosocial functioning deficits. They are at high risk of homelessness and suicide, and the impact on overall mortality is comparable to that of smoking and greater than obesity and alcohol abuse. SSD diagnoses are a significant cause of disability and a drain on VA resources. Auditory hallucinations (AH) are particularly linked to social withdrawal. Stigma against voice-hearing leads to silence, internalized shame, and social isolation, fueling cycles of avoidance and distress. Veteran Voices and Visions (VVV) is a psychosocial group intervention for Veterans with psychosis based on the Hearing Voices (HV) approach that reduces distress related to psychosis and builds a sense of belonging for Veterans living with psychosis. This intervention is hypothesized to increase social integration.

VVV takes a recovery-oriented, peer-led, Veteran-centered approach to understanding and reframing psychosis that emphasizes personal meaning and destigmatization. Pilot data indicates the approach reduces distress due to AH and fosters a sense of belonging. Research with Veterans with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) shows a high sense of belonging is protective against suicidal ideation. The proposed study would be the first ever to test the efficacy of a HV-inspired approach. If successful, it could transform how VA addresses psychosis by mobilizing the peer workforce to the benefit of a vulnerable group of Veterans.

Specific Aims: Aim 1: Assess VVV efficacy: At each site, 80 Veterans will be randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of VVV or a Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP) group. Facilitators will be regularly supervised, and group sessions will be video recorded for fidelity review. Veterans will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks), and follow-up (24 weeks) on the proximal outcomes of distress related to AH and sense of belonging, and distal outcome of social functioning. Secondary outcomes include severity of symptoms, self-efficacy, subjective recovery, self-stigma, loneliness, and hope.

Hypothesis: Veterans in VVV will have reduced distress due to AH and increased sense of belonging relative to Veterans in WRAP at the end of the intervention, and they will have increased social functioning at 24-week follow up.

Aim 2: Identify contextual factors that support or impede VVV implementation in the context of routine care. The investigators will use the updated Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide interviews with VVV facilitators, and local and national mental health leadership. The investigators will use rapid analysis on the resulting qualitative data to assess the context to support implementation of VVV (if effective).

Methodology: This is a 4-year hybrid 1 efficacy trial comparing VVV and WRAP across 2 VA sites.

Path to Translation/Implementation: A hybrid 1 trial is when an intervention is tested for effectiveness while collecting implementation data that could inform future delivery in real-world settings. Adding implementation assessments is a modest investment that does not impede the full test of an intervention's effectiveness and speeds the pace of the research pipeline, which often moves evidence-based practices (EBPs) into real-world settings much too slowly. The next step could be an implementation-focused trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • West Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073-1003
        • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ippolytos A Kalofonos, MD PhD MPH
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15240
        • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has been experiencing auditory hallucinations at least weekly within the past 6 months that are not exclusively due to substance use
  • English fluency sufficient for participating in groups
  • Able to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychosis exclusively due to substance use
  • Clinically significant seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury, dementia, developmental disorder/intellectual disability
  • Inability to provide informed consent for any reason, including due to acute psychosis, mania, or dementia, or active guardianship or durable power of attorney
  • Plan to transfer or terminate care in the next 3 months
  • Has previously attended a VVV group

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Veteran Voices and Visions (VVV)
This is a group-based, peer specialist and clinician co-facilitated psychosocial intervention for Veterans with serious mental illness (SMI), called "Veteran Voices and Visions" (VVV). VVV is an adaptation of a community-based support group model called the Hearing Voices (HV) approach. The approach facilitates group cohesion around and normalization of the common psychotic symptoms of hallucinations, delusions, and social isolation.
This is a group-based, peer specialist and clinician co-facilitated psychosocial intervention for Veterans with SMI, called "Veteran Voices and Visions" (VVV). VVV is an adaptation of a community-based support group model called the Hearing Voices (HV) approach. The approach facilitates group cohesion around and normalization of the common psychotic symptoms of hallucinations, delusions, and social isolation.
Other Names:
  • VVV
Active Comparator: Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP)
Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP) is a peer-led, structured self-management and recovery program designed for serious mental illness delivered in weekly group sessions for 8-12 weeks. It covers personalized wellness strategies, identification of warning signs for re-lapse, and crisis plans. It has improved overall distress due to psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and hope. A systemic review and meta-analysis concluded WRAP reliably improves subjective recovery outcomes but not symptoms. WRAP is not tailored to psychosis.
Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP) is a peer-led, structured self-management and recovery program designed for serious mental illness delivered in weekly group sessions for 8-12 weeks. It covers personalized wellness strategies, identification of warning signs for re-lapse, and crisis plans. It has improved overall distress due to psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and hope. A systemic review and meta-analysis concluded WRAP reliably improves subjective recovery outcomes but not symptoms. WRAP is not tailored to psychosis.
Other Names:
  • WRAP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale for Auditory Hallucinations (PSYRATS-AH)
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
PSYRATS-AH is an 11-item subscale assessing frequency, duration, severity, loudness, location, negative content, controllability of voices, intensity of distress, beliefs about origin of voices, and disruption. Items are rated on a five-point ordinal scale (0-4), range is 0 to 44. Higher score means worse distress. PSYRATS has strong inter-rater reliability (r ⩾ 0.9), test-retest reliability (0.55-0.74), and good validity (0.63-0.76). It is the gold standard for assessment of AH and the main finding from the initial VVV pilot study.
12 and 24 weeks
The Sense of Belonging Inventory-Psychological Experiences (SOBI-P)
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
The SOBI-P is a reliable measure of belonging that consists of 18 items on a 4-point Likert response scale and it is used widely in SSD.
12 and 24 weeks
The Role Functioning Scale (RFS)
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
This is a distal primary outcome. The Role Functioning Scale (RFS) is a broad global integration index across the domains of work, independent living, and family/social networks that ranges from 1 (worst) to 7 (best). It has established reliability and validity in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders. The total score for the RFS is calculated by summing the subscales, resulting in a range of 0-28, where higher scores indicate better functioning.
12 and 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ippolytos A Kalofonos, MD PhD MPH, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
  • Principal Investigator: Matthew J Chinman, PhD, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 29, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The PI will create de-identified, study-specific datasets that include all variables in a publication. Some loss of information might occur given the need to remove protected health information (PHI). The PI will replace social security and medical station numbers with study-specific numbers. The PI will drop date of birth and replace age with age categories, in accordance with PHI requirements for people 85 years of age and older. Dates of service will be replaced with year dummies.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Datasets meeting VA standards for disclosure to the public will be made available within 1 year of publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Prior to distribution, a local privacy officer will certify that all datasets contains no PHI. Final data sets will be maintained locally until enterprise level resources become available for long-term storage and access. Guidance on request and distribution processes will be provided by VA Office of Research and Development (ORD). Those requesting data will be asked to sign a Letter of Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychotic Disorders

Clinical Trials on Veteran Voices and Visions (VVV)

Subscribe