Comparative Effects of Calisthenic and Exercise Snack

May 16, 2026 updated by: Sinem Yenil, PT, PhD, Pamukkale University

Comparative Effects of Music-Accompanied Calisthenic and Exercise Snack Interventions on Pain, Locomotor Performance, and Quality of Life in Healthy Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aimed to compare the effects of music-accompanied exercise snacks and calisthenic exercises on pain, locomotor performance, quality of life, and physical activity-related outcomes in healthy older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

79

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Denizli
      • Denizli, Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye), 20060
        • Sinem Yenil Kocabay

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Voluntary individuals aged 65 years and older, without any contraindication to exercise participation and able to speak and understand Turkish, were included in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Active Comparator: Calisthenic
Participants in the CEG performed music-accompanied bodyweight exercises, with each session lasting approximately 20 minutes.
Experimental: Snack
Participants in the ESG performed music-accompanied exercise sessions under physiotherapist supervision twice weekly for 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
The test measures the time required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters at a safe and comfortable speed, turn around, walk back, and sit down again. Shorter completion times indicate better balance and mobility performance.
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
The 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test was used to assess lower extremity strength and endurance as indicators of functional performance in older adults. The number of complete sit-to-stand repetitions performed within 30 seconds was recorded as the test score
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
Stair Climb Test
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
Participants were instructed to ascend and descend a staircase consisting of nine steps (16-20 cm in height) as quickly and safely as possible. Total completion time was recorded as the outcome measure.
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) is an 8-item unidimensional instrument assessing positive feelings such as enjoyment and pleasure associated with physical activity. Responses are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 7 ("strongly agree"). Higher mean scores indicate greater enjoyment of physical activity.
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Assessment
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
Pain perceived during rest, walking, and stair ascent/descent was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The distance (mm) between the "no pain" anchor and the participant's mark on a 10-cm line was measured, yielding a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
Pain Disability Index (PDI)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
The PDI consists of seven items evaluating the impact of pain on daily functional activities. Participants rate each item on a scale from 0 to 10. Total scores range from 0 to 70, with scores ≥40 indicating high disability. Higher scores reflect greater disability severity.
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
The MFES is based on a visual analog scale assessing confidence in performing daily activities without falling. Participants rate their confidence for each activity on a scale ranging from 0 (no confidence) to 10 (complete confidence). The total score is divided by 14 to obtain the final score. Higher scores indicate lower fall risk, whereas lower scores indicate greater fall risk.
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile for Older Adults (HPLP-OA)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
The HPLP-OA was developed to evaluate health-promoting behaviors in adults aged 65 years and older. The scale consists of 22 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 22 to 88, with higher scores indicating greater frequency of health-promoting behaviors.
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
The IPAQ assesses time spent in physical activities during the previous week, including sitting, walking, moderate-intensity activity, and vigorous-intensity activity. Scores are calculated as MET-minutes/week by multiplying duration, frequency, and metabolic equivalent (MET) values.
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD TR)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
The WHOQOL-OLD module consists of 24 items across six domains, rated using a 5-point Likert scale. Subscale scores range from 4 to 20, and a total score can also be calculated by summing domain scores. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E-60116787-020-811341

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Older Adults

Clinical Trials on Calisthenic Exercise

Subscribe