- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07601438
Comparative Effects of Calisthenic and Exercise Snack
May 16, 2026 updated by: Sinem Yenil, PT, PhD, Pamukkale University
Comparative Effects of Music-Accompanied Calisthenic and Exercise Snack Interventions on Pain, Locomotor Performance, and Quality of Life in Healthy Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aimed to compare the effects of music-accompanied exercise snacks and calisthenic exercises on pain, locomotor performance, quality of life, and physical activity-related outcomes in healthy older adults.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
79
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Denizli
-
Denizli, Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye), 20060
- Sinem Yenil Kocabay
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria: Voluntary individuals aged 65 years and older, without any contraindication to exercise participation and able to speak and understand Turkish, were included in the study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Calisthenic
|
Participants in the CEG performed music-accompanied bodyweight exercises, with each session lasting approximately 20 minutes.
|
|
Experimental: Snack
|
Participants in the ESG performed music-accompanied exercise sessions under physiotherapist supervision twice weekly for 6 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
The test measures the time required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters at a safe and comfortable speed, turn around, walk back, and sit down again.
Shorter completion times indicate better balance and mobility performance.
|
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
|
30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
The 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test was used to assess lower extremity strength and endurance as indicators of functional performance in older adults.
The number of complete sit-to-stand repetitions performed within 30 seconds was recorded as the test score
|
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
|
Stair Climb Test
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
Participants were instructed to ascend and descend a staircase consisting of nine steps (16-20 cm in height) as quickly and safely as possible.
Total completion time was recorded as the outcome measure.
|
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
|
Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) is an 8-item unidimensional instrument assessing positive feelings such as enjoyment and pleasure associated with physical activity.
Responses are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 7 ("strongly agree").
Higher mean scores indicate greater enjoyment of physical activity.
|
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Assessment
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
Pain perceived during rest, walking, and stair ascent/descent was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The distance (mm) between the "no pain" anchor and the participant's mark on a 10-cm line was measured, yielding a score ranging from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
|
Pain Disability Index (PDI)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
The PDI consists of seven items evaluating the impact of pain on daily functional activities.
Participants rate each item on a scale from 0 to 10.
Total scores range from 0 to 70, with scores ≥40 indicating high disability.
Higher scores reflect greater disability severity.
|
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
|
Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
The MFES is based on a visual analog scale assessing confidence in performing daily activities without falling.
Participants rate their confidence for each activity on a scale ranging from 0 (no confidence) to 10 (complete confidence).
The total score is divided by 14 to obtain the final score.
Higher scores indicate lower fall risk, whereas lower scores indicate greater fall risk.
|
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
|
Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile for Older Adults (HPLP-OA)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
The HPLP-OA was developed to evaluate health-promoting behaviors in adults aged 65 years and older.
The scale consists of 22 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale.
Total scores range from 22 to 88, with higher scores indicating greater frequency of health-promoting behaviors.
|
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
|
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
The IPAQ assesses time spent in physical activities during the previous week, including sitting, walking, moderate-intensity activity, and vigorous-intensity activity.
Scores are calculated as MET-minutes/week by multiplying duration, frequency, and metabolic equivalent (MET) values.
|
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
|
World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD TR)
Time Frame: Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
The WHOQOL-OLD module consists of 24 items across six domains, rated using a 5-point Likert scale.
Subscale scores range from 4 to 20, and a total score can also be calculated by summing domain scores.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
|
Preintervention, postintervention 6th week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 20, 2026
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2026
Study Completion (Actual)
April 20, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 16, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
May 22, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 22, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 16, 2026
Last Verified
January 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- E-60116787-020-811341
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy Older Adults
-
KU LeuvenCompletedHealthy Older Adults | Ill Older AdultsBelgium
-
University of West AtticaCompletedHealthy Older Adults | Community Dwelling Older Adults | Older Adults (65 Years and Older)Greece
-
Aix Marseille UniversitéNot yet recruitingHealthy Young Adults | Healthy Older AdultsFrance
-
Hasselt UniversityNot yet recruitingHealthy | Elderly | Young Adults | Older Adults (65 Years and Older)Belgium
-
Universidade Católica PortuguesaClínica NeuroVida (Portugal)Not yet recruitingHealthy Older AdultsPortugal
-
Luleå Tekniska UniversitetCompletedHealthy Older AdultsSweden
-
Sahmyook UniversityCompletedHealthy Older AdultsSouth Korea
-
Instituto Politécnico de LeiriaCompleted
-
Hungarian University of Sports ScienceSemmelweis UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoCompletedHealthy Older AdultsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Calisthenic Exercise
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedQuality of Life | Physical Activity | Hemodialysis | PatientTurkey
-
KTO Karatay UniversityCompletedQuality of Life | ExerciseTurkey
-
Biruni UniversityCompleted
-
Bahçeşehir UniversityCompleted
-
KTO Karatay UniversityCompletedPain | Physical Inactivity | Sleep Hygiene | Smartphone AddictionTurkey
-
Halic UniversityCompleted
-
Biruni UniversityCompletedCognitive ChangeTurkey
-
Feyza Altindal KarabulutCompletedQuality of Life | Proprioception | Balanced | Exercise TheraphyTurkey
-
Bingol UniversityCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedPhysical Fitness | Healthy Life StylePakistan