Effects of Overload Eccentric and Concentric Resistance Training on the Cost of Walking, Muscle-tendon and Jumping Performance in Healthy Older Individuals (EOECORT-COM-JP)

February 17, 2025 updated by: Mohamed Abdelaziz Emam, Hungarian University of Sports Science
Normal aging leads to a decline in neuromuscular and mobility functions, including a 60% reduction in maximal voluntary force production, a 25% decrease in muscle volume and quality (sarcopenia), and reduced tendon stiffness by age 70. These changes impair walking speed, balance, and increase the metabolic cost of walking by ~20% in older adults compared to younger individuals. While walking training can reduce metabolic costs, no interventions have successfully addressed the 20% age-related difference. Resistance training, particularly eccentric (muscle-lengthening) training, shows promise for improving muscle strength and mass, but its effects on functional, cognitive abilities, and walking economy in older adults remain unexplored.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Normal aging is characterized by a decline in neuromuscular and mobility functions. By the age of 70, maximal voluntary force production decreases by approximately 60%, accompanied by a ~25% reduction in muscle volume and quality, leading to sarcopenia. Alongside changes in muscle protein content, composition, and mitochondrial biochemistry, aging also affects tendon properties. While healthy aging does not significantly alter tendon size, it reduces tendon stiffness, which can delay force transmission. These changes in muscle-tendon function contribute to slower walking speeds and impaired static and dynamic balance.

One of the most significant functional changes with aging is the increased metabolic cost of walking. Older individuals require ~20% more metabolic energy to walk the same distance as younger adults, yet the underlying reasons remain unclear. While walking training has been shown to reduce metabolic costs in older adults, no studies have attempted to reduce this 20% age-related difference using alternative interventions.

Resistance training induces adaptations in muscle-tendon function by requiring participants to overcome external loads. Traditional resistance training combines concentric (muscle shortening) and eccentric (muscle lengthening) contractions, but eccentric training has received increasing attention due to its superior benefits in muscle strength and mass improvement. However, no studies have examined how resistance training, particularly with an eccentric focus, impacts functional and cognitive abilities or walking economy in older adults.

Objectives:

This study aims to:

  1. Investigate the effects of resistance training, particularly eccentric-focused training, on muscle-tendon function and walking economy in older adults.
  2. Examine whether these changes translate into improved neuromuscular and cognitive functions.
  3. Determine if improved tendon stiffness leads to more efficient force transmission, reducing walking energy expenditure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Budapest
      • Budapest XII., Budapest, Hungary, 1037
        • Hungarian University of Sports Science, Budapest, Hungary

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Healthy men and women aged 60+ (intervention study).

    • No significant cognitive or cardiovascular impairments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Acute injuries or history of severe tendon injuries (Achilles or patellar tendon rupture).

    • Tendinopathy or chronic musculoskeletal disorders.
    • Hypertension, unless controlled with medication.
    • Neurological or psychiatric disorders (dementia, mild cognitive impairment).
    • Metabolic diseases affecting muscle/tendon function,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Concentric overload resistance training
Receive Concentric overload resistance training
  • Resistance training groups will train 2-3 times per week for 3 months using specialized TechnoGym machines.
  • Exercises include Concentric leg press, knee extension, and ankle plantarflexion in a progressive loading program following American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) & National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) guidelines.
  • Heart rate, blood pressure, and perceived exertion will be monitored during each session.
Other Names:
  • active control
Experimental: Eccentric overload resistance training
Receive Eccentric overload resistance training
  • Resistance training groups will train 2-3 times per week for 3 months using specialized TechnoGym machines.
  • Exercises include Eccentric leg press, knee extension, and ankle plantarflexion in a progressive loading program following American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) & National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) guidelines.
  • Heart rate, blood pressure, and perceived exertion will be monitored during each session.
Placebo Comparator: Active control group
walking intervention
Walking

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Walking metabolic cost
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Assessed using spirometry at different speeds (J/kg/m)
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum isometric voluntary contraction
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Maximum isometric voluntary force using a dynamometer. (Nm)
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Patella and Achilles tendon stiffness
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Stiffness is the slope of the force elongation curve using dynamometer combining with Ultrasound (N/mm)
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Vastus lateralis and Gastrocnemius muscle thickness & tendon thickness
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
VL, GC, and Achilles tendon & patellar tendon will be assessed using Ultrasound images (mm)
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Whole leg muscle mass
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Whole leg muscle mass via DEXA scan.(Kg)
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Jump efficiency
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
squat jump and Countermovement jump height (cm) jump efficiency (%)
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Cognitive Assessments
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

Cognitive tests: Executive function, working memory, and processing speed using some questionnaires with score values.

Reaction Time (milliseconds, ms) Score (points or errors) - Based on correct/incorrect responses in tasks Number of correct responses per second (responses/sec)

Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Prof. DR. Tibor Hortobágyi Hortobágyi, Hungarian University of Sports Science, Department of Kinesioogy, Budapest, Hungary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TE-KEB/No11/2024 (Other Identifier: Hungarian University of sports science)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

15 May 2026

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Older Adults

Clinical Trials on Concentric overload resistance training

Subscribe