- ICH GCP
- Registr klinických studií v USA
- Klinická studie NCT00996203
A Study of Tocilizumab Added to DMARDs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to DMARDs.
28. února 2018 aktualizováno: Hoffmann-La Roche
Local Open-label Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to DMARDs When Adding Tocilizumab (TCZ)
This open-label single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab added to traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to DMARDs.
Patients will receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, in addition to their current non-biologic DMARDs at stable doses.
Anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks, and the target sample size is 200.
Přehled studie
Postavení
Dokončeno
Podmínky
Typ studie
Intervenční
Zápis (Aktuální)
201
Fáze
- Fáze 4
Kontakty a umístění
Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.
Studijní místa
-
-
-
Chelyabinsk, Ruská Federace, 454076
- Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital; Rheumatology
-
Cherkess, Ruská Federace, 369000
- Republican clinical hospital of Karachai-Cherkess; Rheumatologic Department
-
Ekaterinburg, Ruská Federace, 620102
- Municipal Autonomous Institution of Healthcare "City Clinical Hospital #40"
-
Ekaterinburg, Ruská Federace, 620102
- Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital # 1; Rheumatology Dept
-
Irkutsk, Ruská Federace, 664047
- Irkutsk Regional Consulting and Diagnostic Clinical Center; Regional Center of Reumatolodic Deasise
-
Izhevsk, Ruská Federace, 426009
- Republican Clinicodiagnostic Center
-
Kaliningrad, Ruská Federace, 236016
- Kaliningrad Regional Clinical Hospital; Rheumatologic Department
-
Kemerovo, Ruská Federace, 650099
- War Veterans Regional Clinical Hospital;Therapy Department
-
Kirov, Ruská Federace, 610028
- Kirov Regional Clinical Hospital; Reumatology Department
-
Krasnodar, Ruská Federace, 350086
- GUZ Regional clinical hospital # 1
-
Kursk, Ruská Federace, 305007
- GMU Kursk regional clinical hospital
-
Moscow, Ruská Federace, 123060
- Head Clinical Hospital of Internal Affair Ministry of Russia
-
Moscow, Ruská Federace, 129110
- Vladimirskiy Regional Scientific Research Inst.
-
Moscow, Ruská Federace, 115522
- FSBI "Scientific Research Institute of Rheumatology" of russian Academy of Medical Sciences
-
Moscow, Ruská Federace, 115682
- FSBI "FSCC of particularized sorts of medical care and medical technologies of FMBA"
-
Moscow, Ruská Federace, 121359
- FGU Central Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic Administration President RF
-
Nizhny Novgorod, Ruská Federace, 603126
- SIH Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. Semashko
-
Petrozavodsk, Ruská Federace, 185019
- Republican Hospital Named After V.A. Baranov
-
Rostov-na-Donu, Ruská Federace, 344022
- Rostov State Medical University; Cardiorheumatology Department
-
Smolensk, Ruská Federace, 214001
- Clinical hospital #1
-
Surgut, Ruská Federace, 628408
- Surgut Region Clinical Hospital
-
Tjumen, Ruská Federace, 625023
- Glpu Tjumen Regional Clinical Hospital #1
-
UFA, Ruská Federace, 450005
- Republican clinical hospital named after G.G. Kuvatov
-
Ulyanovsk, Ruská Federace, 432063
- State Institution of Healthcare Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Hospital
-
Veliky Novgorod, Ruská Federace, 173008
- GUZ "Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital"; Cardioreumatological
-
Voronezh, Ruská Federace, 394066
- Voronezh Regional Clinical Hospital #1
-
Voronezh, Ruská Federace, 394066
- Budget Institution of Healthcare of Voronezh Region "Voronezh Regional Clinical Hospital #1"
-
Yaroslavl, Ruská Federace, 150062
- SHI Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital
-
-
Kritéria účasti
Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.
Kritéria způsobilosti
Věk způsobilý ke studiu
18 let a starší (Dospělý, Starší dospělý)
Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky
Ne
Pohlaví způsobilá ke studiu
Všechno
Popis
Inclusion Criteria:
- adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis of >/=6 months duration
- inadequate clinical response to current non-biologic DMARDs
- current DMARDs must be at stable dose for 8 weeks prior to study entry
- oral corticosteroids (</=10mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs must be at stable dose for >/=4 weeks prior to screening
Exclusion Criteria:
- rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA
- history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA
- previous treatment with any biologic DMARD
- functional class IV as defined by the ACR classification
- intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to screening
Studijní plán
Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.
Jak je studie koncipována?
Detaily designu
- Primární účel: Léčba
- Přidělení: Nerandomizované
- Intervenční model: Přiřazení jedné skupiny
- Maskování: Žádné (otevřený štítek)
Zbraně a zásahy
Skupina účastníků / Arm |
Intervence / Léčba |
---|---|
Experimentální: 1
|
8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks
stable doses at investigator's prescription
|
Co je měření studie?
Primární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
---|---|---|
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score
Časové okno: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 and Withdrawal Visit
|
HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity.
To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen.
Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all.
Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3. Withdrawal Visit is the final visit prior to the withdrawal of the subject from the study.
|
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 and Withdrawal Visit
|
Percentage of Participants With an HAQ Score Decrease of 20 Percent (%), 50%, and 70% During Tocilizumab Treatment
Časové okno: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity.
To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen.
Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all.
Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.
|
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Change in HAQ Score at Week 24
Časové okno: Baseline and Week 24
|
HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity.
To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen.
Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all.
Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.
|
Baseline and Week 24
|
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
---|---|---|
Pain Score as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Časové okno: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a 100-millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=pain absent and 100=intolerable pain.
Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain.
|
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score
Časové okno: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
EQ-5D questionnaire assess 5 domains of quality of life including mobility, self-care, habitual daily activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each of five domains was assessed by 3 levels depending on severity of a problem and scored using the following: 1=no disturbances, 2=moderate disturbances, 3=severe disturbances.
Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
|
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Change in EQ-5D Score at Week 24 From Baseline
Časové okno: Baseline and Week 24
|
EQ-5D questionnaire assess 5 domains of quality of life including mobility, self-care, habitual daily activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each of five domains was assessed by 3 levels depending on severity of a problem and scored using the following: 1=no disturbances, 2=moderate disturbances, 3=severe disturbances.
Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Minimum clinically significant change in EQ-5D corresponds to the parameter differences before and after treatment = 0.10.
Graduations of assessment of the therapy efficacy by EQ-5D are: Difference (Δ) EQ-5D less than (<)0.10 points: none; 0.10 less than or equal to (≤)Δ EQ-5D ≤0.24: minimal effect; 0.24≤ Δ EQ-5D <0.31: satisfactory effect; Δ EQ-5D greater than or equal to (≥)0.31 points: pronounced effect.
|
Baseline and Week 24
|
General Health Score as Assessed by EQ-5D VAS
Časové okno: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state.
The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality.
|
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response on Health Quality Assessment of EQ-5D
Časové okno: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state.
The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality.
Positive response was defined as an increase of EQ-5D score by 0.1 or more i.e. it is a clinically significant increase.
|
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Change in General Health Assessed by VAS
Časové okno: Baseline and Week 24
|
Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state.
The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality.
|
Baseline and Week 24
|
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)
Časové okno: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
|
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Change in DAS28 Score From Baseline to Week 24
Časové okno: Baseline and Week 24
|
Baseline and Week 24
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Varied Disease Activity Assessed Using DAS28 During Tocilizumab Treatment
Časové okno: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR mm/hour, and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
Disease activity: 0=remission (DAS28 less than [<] 2.6), I=low (DAS28 less than or equal to [≤]2.6 to <3.2), II=moderate (DAS28=3.2
to 5.1), III=high (DAS28 greater than [>]5.1).
|
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) Response
Časové okno: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
ACR20/50/70 response: ≥20%, ≥50%, or ≥70% improvement, respectively, in swollen/tender joint count (66 joints assessed for swelling and 68 joints assessed for tenderness) and in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and acute phase response: C-reactive protein (CRP) or ESR.
|
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28
Časové okno: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as no effect, good effect, and moderate effect, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached.
Good effect: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 score ≤3.2; moderate effect: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 score 3.2 to 5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <1.2 with DAS28 score <3.2; no effect: change from baseline ≤0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 score >5.1.
|
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
C-Reactive Protein
Časové okno: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
CRP (milligrams/Liter) is a mediator of inflammation, acute phase protein.
|
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Časové okno: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
ESR (mm/hr) is used to determine the acute phase response.
|
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé
Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.
Sponzor
Termíny studijních záznamů
Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.
Hlavní termíny studia
Začátek studia (Aktuální)
31. října 2009
Primární dokončení (Aktuální)
14. února 2011
Dokončení studie (Aktuální)
14. února 2011
Termíny zápisu do studia
První předloženo
15. října 2009
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
15. října 2009
První zveřejněno (Odhad)
16. října 2009
Aktualizace studijních záznamů
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)
29. března 2018
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
28. února 2018
Naposledy ověřeno
1. února 2018
Více informací
Termíny související s touto studií
Další relevantní podmínky MeSH
Další identifikační čísla studie
- ML22665
Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .
Klinické studie na tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
-
University of ChicagoAktivní, ne nábor
-
Hoffmann-La RocheDokončeno
-
University of ChicagoNábor
-
Reade Rheumatology Research InstituteZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentNábor
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUkončenoCOVID-19Spojené státy
-
University of ChicagoDokončeno
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNeznámýKoronavirová infekceFrancie
-
Università Politecnica delle MarcheAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche NordNeznámý
-
Hospital of PratoNeznámýObří buněčná arteritidaItálie
-
CelltrionZatím nenabíráme