Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Effekt og sikkerhed af Benralizumab i EGPA sammenlignet med Mepolizumab. (MANDARA)

26. oktober 2026 opdateret af: AstraZeneca

Et randomiseret, dobbeltblindt, aktivt kontrolleret 52-ugers studie med en åben udvidelse til evaluering af Benralizumabs effektivitet og sikkerhed sammenlignet med Mepolizumab i behandlingen af ​​eosinofil granulomatose med polyangiitis (EGPA) hos patienter, der modtager standardbehandlingsterapi

This is a randomized, double blind, active-controlled, parallel group, multicenter 52-week Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of benralizumab 30 mg versus mepolizumab 300 mg administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in patients with relapsing or refractory EGPA on corticosteroid therapy with or without stable immunosuppressive therapy.

All patients who complete the 52-week double-blind treatment period on IP may be eligible to continue into an open label extension (OLE) period. The OLE period is intended to allow each patient at least 1 year of treatment with open-label benralizumab 30 mg administered SC (earlier enrolled patients may therefore be in the OLE for longer than 1 year).

Studieoversigt

Status

Status

Angiver den aktuelle rekrutteringsstatus eller den udvidede adgangsstatus.
Aktiv, ikke rekrutterende

Betingelser

Betingelser

Den sygdom, lidelse, syndrom, sygdom eller skade, der undersøges. På ClinicalTrials.gov kan tilstande også omfatte andre sundhedsrelaterede problemer, såsom levetid, livskvalitet og sundhedsrisici.

Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.

Undersøgelsestype

Undersøgelsestype

Beskriver karakteren af ​​en klinisk undersøgelse. Undersøgelsestyper omfatter interventionelle undersøgelser (også kaldet kliniske forsøg), observationsundersøgelser (herunder patientregistre) og udvidet adgang.
Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

Tilmelding

Antallet af deltagere i en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" tilmelding er det mål for antallet af deltagere, som forskerne skal bruge til undersøgelsen.
140

Fase

Fase

Stadiet af et klinisk forsøg, der studerer et lægemiddel eller et biologisk produkt, baseret på definitioner udviklet af U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Fasen tager udgangspunkt i undersøgelsens formål, antallet af deltagere og andre karakteristika. Der er fem faser: Tidlig fase 1 (tidligere opført som fase 0), fase 1, fase 2, fase 3 og fase 4. Ikke relevant bruges til at beskrive forsøg uden FDA-definerede faser, herunder forsøg med enheder eller adfærdsmæssige indgreb.
  • Fase 3

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Belgien
      • Brussels, Belgien, 1090
        • Research Site
      • Brussels, Belgien, 1070
        • Research Site
  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4Z6
        • Research Site
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • Research Site
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1E2
        • Research Site
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 3A9
        • Research Site
  • Det Forenede Kongerige
      • Cambridge, Det Forenede Kongerige, CB2 0QQ
        • Research Site
      • Leicester, Det Forenede Kongerige, LE3 9QP
        • Research Site
      • London, Det Forenede Kongerige, SE19RT
        • Research Site
      • Portsmouth, Det Forenede Kongerige, PO6 3LY
        • Research Site
  • Forenede Stater
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, Forenede Stater, 80206
        • Research Site
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, Forenede Stater, 48109
        • Research Site
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, Forenede Stater, 55905-0001
        • Research Site
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, Forenede Stater, 87106
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • Great Neck, New York, Forenede Stater, 11021
        • Research Site
      • New York, New York, Forenede Stater, 10021
        • Research Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Forenede Stater, 19104
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • Denison, Texas, Forenede Stater, 75020
        • Research Site
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Forenede Stater, 98115
        • Research Site
  • Frankrig
      • Dijon, Frankrig, 21079
        • Research Site
      • Marseille, Frankrig, 13915
        • Research Site
      • Montpellier, Frankrig, 34090
        • Research Site
      • Nantes, Frankrig, 44093
        • Research Site
      • Paris, Frankrig, 75014
        • Research Site
      • Paris, Frankrig, 75877
        • Research Site
      • Suresnes, Frankrig, 92151
        • Research Site
      • Toulouse, Frankrig, 31059
        • Research Site
  • Israel
      • Ashkelon, Israel, 7830604
        • Research Site
      • Beersheba, Israel, 84101
        • Research Site
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91120
        • Research Site
      • Ramat Gan, Israel, 52621
        • Research Site
      • Rehovot, Israel, 7661041
        • Research Site
      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 6423906
        • Research Site
  • Italien
      • Cuneo, Italien, 12100
        • Research Site
      • Florence, Italien, 50141
        • Research Site
      • Milan, Italien, 20132
        • Research Site
      • Milan, Italien, 20162
        • Research Site
      • Naples, Italien, 80131
        • Research Site
      • Roma, Italien, 00168
        • Research Site
      • Torino, Italien, 10128
        • Research Site
  • Japan
      • Chiba, Japan, 260-0877
        • Research Site
      • Kita-gun, Japan, 761-0793
        • Research Site
      • Sagamihara-shi, Japan, 228-0815
        • Research Site
      • Sendai, Japan, 980-8574
        • Research Site
      • Shinjuku-ku, Japan, 162-8666
        • Research Site
  • Tyskland
      • Bamberg, Tyskland, 96049
        • Research Site
      • Freiburg im Breisgau, Tyskland, 79106
        • Research Site
      • Hamburg, Tyskland, 20251
        • Research Site
      • Kirchheim, Tyskland, 73230
        • Research Site
      • Lübeck, Tyskland, 23538
        • Research Site

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Berettigelseskriterier

De nøglekrav, som personer, der ønsker at deltage i et klinisk studie, skal opfylde eller de egenskaber, de skal have. Kvalifikationskriterier består af både inklusionskriterier (som er nødvendige for at en person kan deltage i undersøgelsen) og eksklusionskriterier (som forhindrer en person i at deltage). Typer af berettigelseskriterier omfatter, om en undersøgelse accepterer raske frivillige, har alders- eller aldersgruppekrav eller er begrænset af køn.

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 130 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female subjects age 18 years or older.

  2. EGPA diagnosis based on history or presence asthma and eosinophilia (>1.0x10^9/L and/or >10% of leucocytes) and at least 2 of; biopsy with eosinophilic vasculitis or perivascular/granulomatous inflammation; mono-or polyneuropathy, non-fixed pulmonary infiltrates, sino-nasal abnormality; cardiomyopathy; glomerulonephritis; alveolar haemorrhage; palpable purpura; anti neutrophil cytoplasmic anti-body (ANCA) positivity (Myeloperoxidase or proteinease 3).

  3. History of relapsing (at least 1 confirmed EGPA relapse within last 2 years and > 12 weeks prior to screening), or refractory (failure to attain remission, defined as BVAS=0 and oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose <=7.5 mg/day of prednisolone or equivalent, following standard induction regimen for at least 3 months and within 6 months prior to screening, or recurrence of symptoms upon OCS tapering at any dose of ≥7.5 mg/day prednisolone or equivalent.

    If induction with glucocorticoidsalone, patient must have failed to attain remission after 3 months and the glucocorticoid dose must be ≥15 mg/day prednisolone or equivalent for the 4 weeks prior to randomization.

  4. Must be on a stable dose of oral prednisolone or prednisone of ≥7.5 mg/day (but not >50mg/day) for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization.

  5. If receiving immunosuppressive therapy (excluding cyclophosphamide) the dose must be stable for the 4 weeks prior to randomization and during the study (dose reductions for safety reasons will be permitted).

  6. QTc(F)<450 msec or QTc(F)<480 msec for patients with bundle branch block.

  7. Females of childbearing potential must use an acceptable method of birth control from randomization for at least 12 weeks after the last study drug administration.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA)
  2. Organ or life-threatening EGPA < 3 months prior to screening
  3. Currently pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during study participation.
  4. Current malignancy or history of malignancy, unless received curative therapy >5 years ago, or >1 year ago for basal cell carcinoma, localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix
  5. An untreated or refractory helminth parasitic infection < 24 weeks prior to screening
  6. Unstable liver disease
  7. Severe or clinically significant, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  8. Other concurrent disease that may put the patient at risk, or may influence the results of the study, or the patients' ability to complete entire duration of the study
  9. Chronic or ongoing infectious disease requiring systemic anti-infective treatment
  10. Known immunodeficiency disorder or positive HIV test
  11. Prior receipt of mepolizumab, reslizumab, dupilumab or benralizumab. Receipt of intravenous/intramuscular/subcutaneous corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to randomization, receipt of omalizumab within 130 days prior to screening, rituximab within 6 months prior to screening (or B-cells not recovered), interferon-α or alemtuzumab within 6 months prior to screening, receipt of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy within 12 weeks prior to screening or an investigational non-biologic product within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to screening, whichever is longer. Receipt of any other marketed or investigational biologic products within 4 months or 5 half-lives prior to screening, whichever is longer.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Tredobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm

Deltagergruppe / Arm

En gruppe eller undergruppe af deltagere i et klinisk forsøg, der modtager en specifik intervention/behandling eller ingen intervention i henhold til forsøgets protokol.
Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.
Eksperimentel: Benralizumab arm

1x benralizumab SC injection + 3x placebo to mepolizumab SC injections
Biologisk: Benralizumab

30 mg/mL solution for injection in a single accessorized prefilled syringe (APFS) will be administered subcutaneously (SC)

Biologisk: Placebo to Mepolizumab

Matching placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride, solutions for injection in 1mL syringes (3 syringes will be used on each dosing occasion). Injection volume per syringe is 1mL. Placebo to Mepolizumban will be administered subcutaneously (SC)
Aktiv komparator: Mepolizumab arm

3x mepolizumab SC injections + 1x placebo to benralizumab SC injection
Biologisk: Mepolizumab

3x100 mg vials of powder for solution for injection reconstituted into 3 separate 1 mL syringes for administration on each dosing occasion. Injection volume per syringe is 1 mL. Mepolizumab active solution will be administered subcutaneously (SC)

Biologisk: Placebo to Benralizumab

Matching placebo solution for injection in APFS, 1 mL fill volume. Placebo solution will be administered subcutaneously (SC)

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Primære resultatmål

I et klinisk studies protokol er det planlagte resultatmål, der er det vigtigste for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention/behandling. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har ét primært resultatmål, men nogle har mere end ét.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Number of Subjects Who Achieved Main Remission at Both Weeks 36 and 48
Tidsramme: Week 36 and Week 48

Percentage of patients with relapsing or refractory EGPA, achieving remission, defined as BVAS = 0 and OCS dose ≤ 4 mg/day (main remission definition) at both Weeks 36 and 48.
Week 36 and Week 48
Supportive Endpoint: Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved Supportive Remission at Both Weeks 36 and 48
Tidsramme: Week 36 and Week 48

Supportive endpoint: Proportion of patients with relapsing or refractory EGPA, achieving remission, defined as BVAS = 0 and OCS dose ≤ 7.5 mg/day (supportive remission definition) at both Weeks 36 and 48.
Week 36 and Week 48

Sekundære resultatmål

Sekundære resultatmål

I en klinisk undersøgelses protokol er et planlagt resultatmål, der ikke er lige så vigtigt som det primære resultatmål for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention, men som stadig er af interesse. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har mere end ét sekundært resultatmål.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Total Accrued Duration of Remission During DB Treatment Period
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks.

Total accrued duration of remission for the following categories: 0 week, > 0 to < 12 week, 12 to < 24 week, 24 to < 36 week, ≥ 36 week.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks.
Total Accrued Duration of Sustained Remission During DB Treatment Period
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Total accrued duration of sustained remission for the following categories: 0 week, > 0 to < 12 week, 12 to < 24 week, 24 to < 36 week, ≥ 36 week.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Time From Randomization to First Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (EGPA) Relapse
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Time from randomization to first Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA) relapse, where relapse is defined as any of the following:

  • Active vasculitis (BVAS > 0); OR
  • Active asthma symptoms and/or signs with a corresponding worsening in ACQ-6 score; OR
  • Active nasal and/or sinus disease, with a corresponding worsening in at least one of the sino-nasal symptom questions; warranting any of the following:
  • An increased dose of OCS therapy to > 4 mg/day prednisolone total daily dose; OR
  • An increased dose or addition of immunosuppressive therapy; OR
  • Hospitalization related to EGPA worsening Calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Annualized Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (EGPA) Relapse Rate
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Annualized Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA) relapse rate through end of DB treatment period. The estimate of annualized relapse rate (relapses per year) and the corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using a negative binomial model. The response variable in the model is the number of relapses experienced by a subject up to Week 52. The logarithm of the subject's corresponding follow-up time up to Week 52 was used as an offset variable to adjust for subjects having different follow-up times during which the events occur. The covariates in the model include treatment arm, baseline dose of prednisone, baseline BVAS and region.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Average Daily Dose of Prednisolone/Prednisone and Change From Baseline During Week 48 Through 52
Tidsramme: last 4 weeks of DB period

Average daily dose of prednisolone/prednisone and change from baseline during Week 48 through 52, or last 28 days prior to last double-blind assessment for those that withdrew
last 4 weeks of DB period
Proportion of Patients With Average Daily Dose of Prednisolone/Prednisone During Week 48 Through 52
Tidsramme: last 4 weeks of DB period

Proportion of patients with average daily dose of prednisolone/prednisone during Week 48 through 52 in each category: 0 mg; >0 to ≤ 4 mg; > 4 to ≤ 7.5 mg and > 7.5 mg
last 4 weeks of DB period
Percentage Reduction From Baseline in Average Daily Dose of Prednisolone/Prednisone During Week 48 Through 52
Tidsramme: last 4 weeks of DB period

Percentage reduction from baseline in average daily dose of prednisolone/prednisone during Week 48 through 52 in each category: no reduction or withdrawal from treatment; < 25% reduction; 25 to < 50% reduction; 50 to <75% reduction; 75 to < 100% reduction; 100% reduction.
last 4 weeks of DB period
Proportion of Subjects With Reduction From Baseline in Average Daily Dose of Prednisolone/Prednisone During Week 48 Through 52
Tidsramme: last 4 weeks of DB period

Proportion of subjects with reduction from baseline in average daily dose of prednisolone/prednisone during Week 48 through 52 in each category: >= 50% reduction; 100% reduction; OCS dose <= 4 mg/day.
last 4 weeks of DB period
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve Clinical Benefit
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Proportion of subjects who achieved any clinical benefit definition 1 (defined as any of the following:

  • Main remission at any time in DB period
  • >= 50% reduction in OCS dose in Weeks 48 to 52
  • EGPA relapse free in DB period) and subjects who achieved complete response definition 1 (defined as meeting all the definition 1 criteria above.)
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Proportion of Patients Who Have Achieved Remission Within the First 24 Weeks and Remained in Remission for Remainder of the Double-blind Treatment Period
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Proportion of patients who have achieved remission within the first 24 weeks and remained in remission for remainder of the double-blind treatment period
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS)
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) change from baseline by timepoint up to week 52. The BVAS form is divided into 9 organ-based systems, with each section including symptoms/signs that are typical of that particular organ involvement in systemic vasculitis. The total score on all 9 organ systems gives an indication of the disease activity of each patient at the time of scoring. Total scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more active vasculitis.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Spirometry Change From Baseline by Timepoint up to Week 52: Pre-BD FEV1 (L)
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Pre-bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume during first second (FEV1) change from baseline by timepoint up to week 52
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Spirometry Change From Baseline by Timepoint up to Week 52: Pre-BD FVC (L)
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Pre-bronchodilator (BD) Forced vital capacity (FVC) change from baseline by timepoint up to week 52
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI)
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) change from baseline by timepoint up to week 52. The VDI is divided into 11 organ systems and records items of damage, due to vasculitis, treatment or unrelated, that have occurred since the onset of vasculitis. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, ranging from 0 to 64, with a higher score indicating more damage.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (6-item Version) (ACQ-6)
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Asthma Control Questionnaire (6-item version) (ACQ-6) change from baseline by timepoint up to week 52. The ACQ-6 score is calculated by taking the mean of 6 equally weighted domains, with a range of 0 (well controlled) to 6 (extremely poorly controlled).
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36-item Health Survey (Version 2, Acute Recall) (SF-36v2) Component: Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Short Form 36-item health survey (version 2, acute recall) (SF-36v2) component Physical Component Summary (PCS) change from baseline by timepoint up to week 52. PCS score ranges from 10.8 to 75.5, where a higher score indicates better health.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36-item Health Survey (Version 2, Acute Recall) (SF-36v2) Component: Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Short Form 36-item health survey (version 2, acute recall) (SF-36v2) component Mental Component Summary (MCS) change from baseline by timepoint up to week 52. MCS score ranges from 5.6 to 69.7, where a higher score indicates better health.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) total score change from baseline by timepoint up to week 52. Patient reported symptom severity and symptom impact over the previous 2 weeks on 22 items are captured via a 6-point scale (0 = no problem to 5 = problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of item scores and ranges from 0 to 110 (higher scores indicate poorer outcomes).
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Sino-nasal Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) Scores: Symptom Runny Nose
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Sino-nasal Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) scores : symptom runny nose by timepoint. For the SSQ, participants rate each symptom against the following categories: very severe, severe, moderate, mild, none. Higher scores indicate greater severity (0 = none to 4 = very severe).
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Sino-nasal Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) Scores: Symptom Post-nasal Discharge
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Sino-nasal Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) scores : symptom Post-nasal discharge by timepoint. For the SSQ, participants rate each symptom against the following categories: very severe, severe, moderate, mild, none. Higher scores indicate greater severity (0 = none to 4 = very severe).
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Sino-nasal Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) Scores: Symptom Facial Pain/Pressure
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Sino-nasal Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) scores: symptom Facial pain/pressure by timepoint. For the SSQ, participants rate each symptom against the following categories: very severe, severe, moderate, mild, none. Higher scores indicate greater severity (0 = none to 4 = very severe).
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Sino-nasal Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) Scores: Symptom Loss or Reduction in Sense of Taste/Smell
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Sino-nasal Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) scores: symptom Loss or reduction in sense of taste/smell by timepoint. For the SSQ, participants rate each symptom against the following categories: very severe, severe, moderate, mild, none. Higher scores indicate greater severity (0 = none to 4 = very severe).
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Sino-nasal Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) Scores: Symptom Blockage/Congestion of Nose
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Sino-nasal Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) scores: symptom Blockage/congestion of nose by timepoint. For the SSQ, participants rate each symptom against the following categories: very severe, severe, moderate, mild, none. Higher scores indicate greater severity (0 = none to 4 = very severe).
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Category
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) category by timepoint
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Category
Tidsramme: from baseline to week 4

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) category by timepoint
from baseline to week 4
WPAI-GH Endpoint, Change From Baseline by Timepoint: Absenteeism (%)
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI-GH) has 6 questions which address absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced effectiveness while working), overall work productivity loss (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment for the 7 days prior to the assessment. WPAI outcomes are presented as impairment percentages (a higher percentage indicating greater impairment and less productivity). Subscale: Absenteeism (work time missed) (%) score, range 0-100.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
WPAI-GH Endpoint, Change From Baseline by Timepoint up to Week 52: Subscale: Presenteeism (Impairment at Work) (%), Range 0-100.
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI-GH) has 6 questions which address absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced effectiveness while working), overall work productivity loss (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment for the 7 days prior to the assessment. WPAI outcomes are presented as impairment percentages (a higher percentage indicating greater impairment and less productivity). Presenteeism (%) score.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
WPAI-GH Endpoint, Change From Baseline by Timepoint: Work Productivity Loss (%)
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI-GH) has 6 questions which address absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced effectiveness while working), overall work productivity loss (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment for the 7 days prior to the assessment. WPAI outcomes are presented as impairment percentages (a higher percentage indicating greater impairment and less productivity). Work productivity loss (%) score, range 0-100.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
WPAI-GH Endpoint, Change From Baseline by Timepoint: Activity Impairment (%)
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI-GH) has 6 questions which address absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced effectiveness while working), overall work productivity loss (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment for the 7 days prior to the assessment. WPAI outcomes are presented as impairment percentages (a higher percentage indicating greater impairment and less productivity). Activity impairment (%) score, range 0-100.
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks
Absolute Eosinophil Count, Change From Baseline
Tidsramme: from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Absolute eosinophil count, change from baseline by timepoint up to week 52
from baseline to end of DB period, 52 Weeks

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Den organisation eller person, der igangsætter undersøgelsen, og som har myndighed og kontrol over undersøgelsen.
AstraZeneca

Efterforskere

Efterforskere

En forsker involveret i et klinisk studie. Beslægtede termer omfatter stedets principal investigator, site sub-investigator, studieformand, undersøgelsesleder og undersøgelseshovedinvestigator.
  • Ledende efterforsker: Michael Wechsler, MD, National Jewish Health, 1400 Jackson St Denver, CO 80206

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Hjælpsomme links

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

Studiestart

Den faktiske dato, hvor den første deltager blev tilmeldt en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" undersøgelses startdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens startdato.
29. oktober 2019

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

Primær færdiggørelse

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention for at indsamle endelige data for det primære resultatmål. Hvorvidt det kliniske studie sluttede i henhold til protokollen eller blev afsluttet, påvirker ikke denne dato. For kliniske undersøgelser med mere end ét primært resultatmål med forskellige afslutningsdatoer refererer dette udtryk til den dato, hvor dataindsamlingen er afsluttet for alle de primære resultatmål. Den "forventede" primære afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være den primære afslutningsdato for undersøgelsen.
10. august 2023

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

Studieafslutning

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention/behandling for at indsamle endelige data for de primære resultatmål, sekundære udfaldsmål og uønskede hændelser (det vil sige den sidste deltagers sidste besøg). Den "forventede" undersøgelses afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens afslutningsdato.
30. november 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

Først indsendt

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsendte en undersøgelsespost til ClinicalTrials.gov. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den første indsendte dato og postens tilgængelighed på ClinicalTrials.gov (den første offentliggjorte dato).
29. september 2019

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsender en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Sponsoren eller investigatoren skal muligvis revidere og indsende en undersøgelsespost en eller flere gange, før NLM's kvalitetskontrolkriterier er opfyldt. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
5. november 2019

Først opslået (Faktiske)

Først opslået

Datoen, hvor undersøgelsesposten først var tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov efter National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgang er afsluttet. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte undersøgelsesposten, og den første offentliggjorte dato.
8. november 2019

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

Sidste opdatering sendt

Den seneste dato, hvor ændringer i en undersøgelsespost blev gjort tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov. Der kan være en forsinkelse mellem det tidspunkt, hvornår ændringerne blev indsendt til ClinicalTrials.gov af undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator (datoen for sidste opdatering afsendt) og den sidste opdatering, der blev sendt.
9. november 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte ændringer til en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
26. oktober 2026

Sidst verificeret

Sidst verificeret

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator bekræftede oplysningerne om en klinisk undersøgelse på ClinicalTrials.gov som nøjagtige og aktuelle. Hvis en undersøgelse med rekrutteringsstatus som rekruttering; rekrutterer endnu ikke; eller aktiv, ikke rekruttering er ikke blevet bekræftet inden for de seneste 2 år, er undersøgelsens rekrutteringsstatus vist som ukendt.
1. oktober 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre identifikatorer eller ID-numre end NCT-nummeret, der er tildelt til en klinisk undersøgelse af undersøgelsens sponsor, finansieringsgivere eller andre. Disse numre kan omfatte unikke identifikatorer fra andre forsøgsregistre og National Institutes of Health-bevillingsnumre.
  • D3253C00001
  • 2019-001832-77 (EudraCT nummer)
  • 2023-510248-19-00 (Anden identifikator: EU Trial (CTIS) Number)
  • 2023 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)
  • 2019 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal Vivli.org. All requests will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

"Yes", indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be approved.

IPD-delingstidsramme

AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA/PhRMA Data-Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please refer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD-delingsadgangskriterier

When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the anonymized individual patient-level data via secure research environment Vivli.org. A Signed Data Usage Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information.

IPD-deling Understøttende informationstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ja

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Cookieindstillinger

Vi bruger cookies for at sikre, at vi giver dig den bedste oplevelse på vores hjemmeside. For flere detaljer skal du læse omhyggeligt vores Politik om beskyttelse af personlige oplysninger og cookies. ...>>>Du kan når som helst ændre dine præferencer eller trække dit samtykke tilbage ved at slette cookies fra din hjemmeside eller computer som beskrevet i politikken. Accepter det og vælg dine præferencer ved at markere de tilsvarende felter i afsnittet "Administrer indstillinger" nedenfor. Læs vores servicevilkår omhyggeligt, inden du fortsætter med at bruge nogen del af dette websted.
«Administrer indstillinger