- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT05038319
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ENDOSCOPIC CONVENTIONAL CYANOACRYLATE GLUE VS EUS-GUIDED COIL PLUS CYANOACRYLATE TECHNIQUE IN THE TREATMENT OF GASTRIC VARICES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (GLUE)
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ENDOSCOPIC CONVENTIONAL CYANOACRYLATE GLUE VS EUS-GUIDED COIL PLUS CYANOACRYLATE TECHNIQUE IN THE TREATMENT OF GASTRIC VARICES
To compare safety and efficacy of Endoscopic conventional technique (cyanoacrylate alone) to the EUS-guided injection technique (coil and cyanoacrylate) in the treatment of gastric varices.
Methods:
Patient recruitment:
Patients would be recruited from the endoscopy centre prior to their scheduled endoscopic intervention.
Study intervention :- Cyanoacrylate injection and EUS guided coil and glue injection The procedures would be performed by experienced endoscopists. The procedure would be performed under conscious sedation or monitored anaesthesia. The procedures would be performed by a therapeutic endoscope with the through the scope method. The endoscope would be used to reach the site of Varices. In Conventional technique treatment with cyanoacrylate the injection was performed using a 23-G sclerotherapy needle catheter (Interject®,Cook). One vial of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (0.5 mL) was mixed with Lipiodol® in a 1:1 ratio, and injected intravesically as a 1 mL bolus. The injection was repeated until total hardening of the varix. In treatment with coil and cyanoacrylate once the gastric varix was identified, the total diameter of the vascular pseudotumor was measured and the puncture was made at the site of the widest varix. The puncture was performed using a 19 G needle (Expect®,Cook). The size of the coil used was selected based on the size of the widest varix in the pseudotumor; the size of the coil after release should not be greater than the caliber of the vessel. Following coil deployment, 2 mL of distilled water was injected, followed by one vial (0.5 mL) of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate mixed with Lipiodol in 1:1 ratio. Then, another 2 mL of distilled water was injected, and the needle was removed.
COIL and GLUE:
Cyanoacrylate injection remains the conventional treatment method. Since coils were first used to treat ectopic varices by Levy in 2008(6), this technique has been increasingly implemented into clinical practice. However, its higher cost has been a limiting factor in more widespread use.
Depending on the ectasia of the varix the following coil was deployed: 8 mm x 20 cm, 10 mm x 20 cm, or 10 mm x 30 cm (Interlock-18 Fibered IDC Occlusion System,Cook).
D.2.5 Randomization Patients were randomized into two groups: group I received standard endoscopic treatment with injection of a cyanoacrylate/Lipiodol (1:1) solution and group II received EUS-guided coiling and cyanoacrylate injection treatment A computer-based randomization list was generated with the online software Research Randomizer with 1:1 ratio (www.randomizer.org). An independent researcher not involved in this trial created the randomization list and sealed sequential opaque envelopes containing the random allocation sequence. The complete list generation occurred before the first enrollment.
D.2.6 Post-procedural management After the procedure, EUS with Doppler flow evaluation was repeated to check the presence or absence of flow within the varix. The patients remained under observation in the GI endoscopy unit for at least one hour, being released if no complaint was reported. After endoscopic treatment, all patients underwent thoracic and abdomen computerized tomography (CT) scanning within one week, independent of the development of clinical symptoms.
Studieoversigt
Detaljeret beskrivelse
All patients returned to the GI endoscopy unit approximately one month after initial endoscopic intervention for a repeat EUS evaluation.
Technical success is defined as complete obliteration of varices and absence of flow signal.On this occasion, if any residual flow was identified, new treatment was performed following the same technique initially used, and another evaluation was thus performed one month later. This scenario was repeated until complete thrombosis was achieved.
Complications that occurred during the procedure or within seven days post-intervention were defined as early complications, whereas those that occurred greater than or equal to seven days post-intervention were defined as late complications.
Recurrence was defined as evidence of any flow within the varix which occurred after initial obliteration had been confirmed.
5.Esophageal stricture 6.Iodine allergy (for EV)
Follow-up:
Once complete thrombosis was achieved, follow-up evaluations were performed three and nine months later (i.e. four and 10 months after therapy), at which time patients were questioned about any post-procedure complications, and underwent another EUS examination, which permitted repeat evaluations of flow within the treated vessel.
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Forventet)
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Satya Maharshi Tummalapalli, MBBS MD
- Telefonnummer: 04023378888
- E-mail: maharshi2059@gmail.com
Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup
- Navn: RAJESH GOUD, M.PHARMA, MBA
- Telefonnummer: 04023378888
- E-mail: rajeshgoud761@gmail.com
Studiesteder
-
-
Telangana
-
Hyderabad, Telangana, Indien, 500082
- Rekruttering
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
-
Kontakt:
- SATYA MAHARSHI, MBBS MD
- Telefonnummer: 04023378888
- E-mail: maharshi2059@gmail.com
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years old, patients diagnosed with
- gastric varices larger than 2.0 cm in total diameter of the vascular pseudotumor type GOV2 or IGV 1.
- Active bleeder
- Secondary prophylaxis - h/o previous bleed
- High risk GV (GOV 2/IGV 1) - Baveno VI-
- Primary prophylaxis
Excusion criteria:
- Previous HRS
- MOF
- Platelet <50,000/cumm
- INR>2
- Esophageal stricture
- Iodine allergy (for EV)
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Dobbelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
---|---|
Aktiv komparator: Cyanoacrylate injection and EUS guided coil and glue injection
The procedure would be performed under conscious sedation.The endoscope would be used to reach the site of Varices.
In Conventional technique treatment with cyanoacrylate the injection was performed using a 23-G sclerotherapy needle catheter .
One vial of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (0.5 mL) was mixed with Lipiodol) in a 1:1 ratio, and injected intravesically as a 1 mL bolus.
The injection was repeated until total hardening of the varix.
In treatment with coil and cyanoacrylate once the gastric varix was identified, the total diameter of the vascular pseudotumor was measured and the puncture was made at the site of the widest varix.
The puncture was performed using a 19 G needle .
the size of the coil after release should not be greater than the caliber of the vessel.
Following coil deployment, 2 mL of distilled water was injected, followed by one vial (0.5 mL) of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate mixed with Lipiodol in 1:1 ratio.
|
The procedures would be performed by a therapeutic endoscope with the through the scope method.
The endoscope would be used to reach the site of Varices.
|
Placebo komparator: COIL and GLUE
Cyanoacrylate injection, first published by Soehendra in 1986, remains the conventional treatment method. Since coils were first used to treat ectopic varices by Levy in 2008(6), this technique has been increasingly implemented into clinical practice. However, its higher cost has been a limiting factor in more widespread use. Depending on the ectasia of the varix the following coil was deployed: 8 mm x 20 cm, 10 mm x 20 cm, or 10 mm x 30 cm (Interlock-18 Fibered IDC Occlusion System,Cook). |
The procedures would be performed by a therapeutic endoscope with the through the scope method.
The endoscope would be used to reach the site of Varices.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
Primary outcome was to compare the occurrence of embolism in the two groups
Tidsramme: 4 months
|
Technical success is defined as complete obliteration of varices and absence of flow signal.On this occasion, if any residual flow was identified, new treatment was performed following the same technique initially used, and another evaluation was thus performed one month later.
This scenario was repeated until complete thrombosis was achieved.
|
4 months
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
Secondary outcome was to evaluate the efficacy of the two techniques in the eradication of the varices.
Tidsramme: 9 MONTHS
|
Technical success is defined as complete obliteration of varices and absence of flow signal.On this occasion, if any residual flow was identified, new treatment was performed following the same technique initially used, and another evaluation was thus performed one month later.
This scenario was repeated until complete thrombosis was achieved.
|
9 MONTHS
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Efterforskere
- Studieleder: RAJESH GUPTA, MBBS MD, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Pvt Ltd
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær færdiggørelse (Forventet)
Studieafslutning (Forventet)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- EUS GLUE 001
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .
Kliniske forsøg med EUS
-
Fondazione del Piemonte per l'OncologiaRekrutteringSubepiteliale gastrointestinale tumorerItalien
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasRekrutteringOndartet biliær obstruktionItalien
-
Per HedenströmAfsluttet
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityUkendtKræft i bugspytkirtlen | Cholangiocarcinom | Galdevejskræft | Kronisk pancreatitis | Galdeforsnævring | Biliær obstruktion | Ampulær kræft | Stentblokering | Proksimal kanalforsnævring | Distal kanalforsnævring | Biliær sphincter stenose | Påvirkede sten | Peri-ampullære divertikler | Ændret anatomiForenede Stater, Brasilien
-
University of BolognaAfsluttetLæsion; Gastrointestinale | Lever-, galde-, bugspytkirtel- og mave-tarmsygdomme, nrItalien
-
University of FloridaJohns Hopkins University; Mayo Clinic; Yale University; Columbia University; Ochsner... og andre samarbejdspartnereAfsluttetGastroenterologi | LæsionerForenede Stater
-
AdventHealthAfsluttetPancreas neoplasmaForenede Stater
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteAmerican Cancer Society, Inc.AfsluttetBugspytkirteltumorerForenede Stater
-
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaIkke rekrutterer endnu
-
University of Colorado, DenverUS EndoscopyRekrutteringBugspytkirtelcysteForenede Stater