Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Weaning From Nasal High Flow Therapy

26. januar 2022 opdateret af: Prof Jean-Damien RICARD, Hôpital Louis Mourier

Weaning From Nasal High Flow Therapy: an Explorative Study Assessing the Usefulness of the ROX Index to Predict Outcome of the Weaning Process in Combination With a Withdrawal Trial

Nasal high flow is widely used in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. It has been shown to improve patient comfort, increase oxygenation and reduce need for intubation in some patients. The Respiratory Oxygenation (ROX) index has been established as a simple tool to help clinicians identify those patients who will succeed and those who will fail under nasal high flow and therefore predict the need for intubation. However, when nasal high flow therapy is successful, little is known as to how and when weaning of this device should be performed and what are the predictors of a safe withdrawal of the device. The objectives of this retrospective exploratory study are to identify a cut-off value of the ROX index predictive of success of the withdrawal trial, to describe a one-year use of the withdrawal trial; to describe the ROX value closest to weaning from nasal high flow, and to identify factors associated with success or failure of the withdrawal trial from nasal high flow therapy in patients receiving nasal high flow therapy.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Although nasal high flow is widely used in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, and its benefits have been shown in multiple studies, little is known as to how and when weaning from the technique device should be performed and what are the predictors of a safe withdrawal. The Respiratory Oxygenation (ROX) index was established and tested to predict outcome of nasal high flow therapy in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. It combines three parameters available at the bedside that reflect patient's respiratory status: respiratory rate, the level of the inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) and pulse oximetry (SpO2). Importantly, the combination of these three parameters outweighed the performance of each parameter taken separately to predict nasal high flow therapy outcome. Since its initial publication, several studies coming from different countries have confirmed the potential for the ROX index to predict need for intubation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, thus making a valuable tool accessible to everyone, including nurses, to monitor on a routine basis. Because it reflects the patient's respiratory status, the greater the score, the better the patient's condition. Hence, one may hypothesize that, at the other end of the spectrum of respiratory failure (i.e., at the stage of weaning and withdrawal of the high flow device when the patient has considerably improved), the ROX index may also help identify those patients who will be successfully separated from the nasal high flow support. To date, one study has suggested that among several parameters, the value of the ROX index could be associated with successful cessation of nasal high flow. Here, in a retrospective exploratory study, investigators aim to to identify a cut-off value of the ROX index predictive of success of the withdrawal trial, to describe a one-year use of the withdrawal trial (average duration of use of nasal high flow before weaning, number of weaning trials, number of failed and successful weaning trials.); to describe the ROX value closest to weaning from nasal high flow, and to identify factors associated with success or failure of the withdrawal trial from nasal high flow therapy in patients receiving nasal high flow therapy; A successful withdrawal is defined as the withdrawal of nasal high flow without necessity of placing the patient back on nasal high flow within the following 24h. A failed withdrawal is defined by the need to resume nasal high flow within the 24h hours following the withdrawal. The possible identification of a cut-off value may help clinicians initiate earlier weaning from nasal high flow.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

62

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Colombes, Frankrig, 92700
        • Hôpital Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

ICU patients treated with nasal high flow therapy

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

- ICU patient treated with nasal high flow

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age < 18 years
  • concomitant treatment with non-invasive ventilation
  • acute hypercapnic respiratory failure

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Value of the Respiratory Oxygenation index (ROX) at nasal high flow withdrawal
Tidsramme: through each nasal high flow therapy, that lasts an average of 24hours
the ROX index the closest to the time at which nasal high flow is withdrawn will be recorded
through each nasal high flow therapy, that lasts an average of 24hours

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
use of nasal high flow before weaning
Tidsramme: through each nasal high flow therapy, that lasts an average of 24 hours
average duration of nasal high flow therapy before initiating a withdrawal trial (in hours)
through each nasal high flow therapy, that lasts an average of 24 hours
number of withdrawal trials
Tidsramme: through each nasal high flow therapy, that lasts an average of 24 hours
the number of trials each patient will have performed will be recorded
through each nasal high flow therapy, that lasts an average of 24 hours
number of patients who failed a withdrawal trial
Tidsramme: throughout study duration which is a one-year period
withdrawal failure is defined by patients who required to be placed back on nasal high flow after withdrawal of the high flow device within 24 hours of withdrawal.
throughout study duration which is a one-year period
number of patients who succeeded a withdrawal trial
Tidsramme: throughout study duration which is a one-year period
withdrawal success is defined by patients that have not required to be placed back on nasal high flow after withdrawal of the high flow device within 24 hours of withdrawal.
throughout study duration which is a one-year period

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Jean-Damien Ricard, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. januar 2019

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

31. december 2019

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

31. august 2021

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

11. januar 2022

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

26. januar 2022

Først opslået (Faktiske)

27. januar 2022

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

27. januar 2022

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

26. januar 2022

Sidst verificeret

1. januar 2022

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Acute respiratory distress syndrom

3
Abonner