Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

QFR-Guided Virtual Stenting for Preprocedural Physiological Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial (FAVOR-Virtual)

7. juni 2026 opdateret af: Ying Song, China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of Preprocedural Physiological Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Coronary Imaging-Physiology Fusion-Based Virtual Stenting Technology

Coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains the standard treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease; however, suboptimal post-PCI physiological outcomes remain common and are associated with adverse cardiovascular prognosis. Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)-based virtual stenting technology enables simulation of post-intervention coronary physiology before PCI and may facilitate individualized optimization of stent implantation strategies.

This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether preprocedural physiological optimization of PCI using coronary imaging-physiology fusion-based virtual stenting technology improves clinical outcomes compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI. Eligible patients undergoing PCI for coronary artery disease will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either virtual stenting-guided PCI optimization or standard angiography-guided PCI.

The primary endpoint is major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization within 1 year after PCI. Secondary endpoints include post-PCI physiological optimization, cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, quality of life, procedural safety, and health economic outcomes.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by coronary angiography remains the current standard treatment approach for coronary artery disease. However, angiographic optimization does not necessarily correspond to physiological optimization, and a considerable proportion of patients experience suboptimal post-PCI coronary physiological results, which are associated with increased risks of adverse cardiovascular events.

Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)-derived physiological assessment provides a non-wire, angiography-based method for functional evaluation of coronary lesions. Recent developments in virtual stenting technology enable simulation of residual coronary physiology after hypothetical stent implantation, thereby allowing preprocedural prediction of post-PCI QFR and optimization of interventional strategies.

The present study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled superiority trial designed to evaluate whether coronary imaging-physiology fusion-based virtual stenting technology for preprocedural physiological optimization improves clinical outcomes compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI.

Approximately 1,472 participants with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either: Virtual stenting-guided PCI optimization; or Standard angiography-guided PCI.

The primary endpoint is 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization.

Secondary endpoints include immediate post-PCI physiological optimization, cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, quality of life assessed by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D), procedural safety, and health economic outcomes.

Participants will be followed at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI. The study will also evaluate concordance between predicted post-PCI QFR derived from virtual stenting and actual postprocedural physiological measurements, as well as changes in operator treatment strategies after physiological optimization.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

1472

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Studiesteder

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Kina, 100037
        • Fuwai Hospital, CAMS & PUMC
        • Kontakt:

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Diagnosis of coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to current clinical practice.
  • Presence of at least one target coronary lesion considered suitable for PCI and evaluable by angiography-derived Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR).
  • Ability to undergo coronary angiography and PCI. Provision of written informed consent before study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to PCI or inability to undergo coronary intervention. Severe renal dysfunction or other conditions making angiographic procedures unsuitable.
  • High bleeding risk judged by investigators.
  • Inability to complete follow-up or comply with study procedures.
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year due to non-cardiovascular comorbidities.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial that may interfere with study outcomes.
  • Coronary anatomy unsuitable for QFR-based virtual stenting analysis.
  • Any condition judged by investigators to make study participation inappropriate.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Virtual Stenting-Guided PCI Optimization
Participants randomized to the experimental group will undergo coronary imaging-physiology fusion-based virtual stenting analysis before PCI. Predicted post-PCI physiological outcomes will be used to optimize interventional strategies, including lesion coverage, stent length, stent position, and procedural planning before stent implantation.
Preprocedural physiological optimization of PCI using coronary imaging-physiology fusion-based virtual stenting technology based on angiography-derived Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) assessment to guide stent implantation strategy.
Aktiv komparator: Angiography-Guided PCI
Participants randomized to the control group will undergo PCI according to standard angiographic guidance and operator judgment without virtual stenting-guided physiological optimization.
Conventional percutaneous coronary intervention performed according to angiographic findings and routine clinical practice without use of virtual stenting-guided physiological optimization.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Tidsramme: Within 1 year after PCI
Composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization after index PCI.
Within 1 year after PCI

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Post-PCI Physiological Optimization
Tidsramme: Immediately after PCI
Successful physiological optimization defined as postprocedural TIMI grade 3 flow and post-PCI Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) ≥0.90 in the target vessel immediately after PCI.
Immediately after PCI
Cardiovascular Death or Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction
Tidsramme: Within 1 year after PCI
Composite of cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction after index PCI.
Within 1 year after PCI
Myocardial Infarction
Tidsramme: Within 1 year after PCI
This includes perioperative myocardial infarction and non-fatal myocardial infarction (including target vessel and non-target vessel related myocardial infarction) (30 days, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively).
Within 1 year after PCI

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
All-Cause Mortality
Tidsramme: Within 1 year after PCI
Death from any cause, including cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death, or death of undetermined cause.
Within 1 year after PCI
Ischemia-Driven Repeat Revascularization
Tidsramme: Within 1 year after PCI
Repeat coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) associated with ischemic symptoms, positive functional testing, angiographic stenosis ≥50% with ischemic evidence, or stenosis ≥70% regardless of symptoms.
Within 1 year after PCI
All revascularization
Tidsramme: Within 1 year after PCI
Including target-vessel and non-target vessel, ischemia-driven and non-ischemia driven
Within 1 year after PCI
Definite or Probable Stent Thrombosis
Tidsramme: Within 1 year after PCI
Definite or probable stent thrombosis according to ARC-2 definitions, including acute, subacute, late, and very late stent thrombosis.
Within 1 year after PCI
Major Bleeding Events
Tidsramme: Within 1 year after PCI
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or type 5 bleeding.
Within 1 year after PCI
Health-Related Quality of Life - SAQ
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI
Quality of life assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI
Health-Related Quality of Life - EQ-5D
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI
Quality of Life assessed by EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D).
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI
Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
Tidsramme: Within 1 year after PCI
Cost-utility evaluation using quality-adjusted life years estimated from EQ-5D utility scores using the Japanese time trade-off (TTO) conversion algorithm.
Within 1 year after PCI
Healthcare Costs
Tidsramme: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI
Direct medical costs including index hospitalization costs, cardiovascular medication costs, outpatient costs, hospitalization costs, and MACE-related medical expenditures.
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Anslået)

1. juli 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

31. december 2028

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

31. december 2028

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

1. juni 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

7. juni 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

9. juni 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

9. juni 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

7. juni 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juni 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Deidentified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications, including demographic characteristics, baseline clinical variables, procedural information, and outcome measures, may be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD-delingstidsramme

Beginning 12 months after publication and ending 5 years after publication

IPD-delingsadgangskriterier

Data will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request and approval by the study steering committee, subject to institutional and regulatory requirements.

IPD-deling Understøttende informationstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Koronararteriesygdom

Kliniske forsøg med Virtual Stenting-Guided PCI Optimization

Abonner