Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Closed-Loop Control in Young Children 5-8 Years Old Using DiAs Platform

22. Juni 2017 aktualisiert von: Mark DeBoer, MD, University of Virginia
The overall aim of this proposed research is to determine the safety, feasibility and efficacy (AP vs at home use of SAP) of the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) controller in day and night closed-loop control in young children 5-8 years old with type 1 diabetes over multiple 48 hours in an out-patient setting.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Young children with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) in the age range of 5-8 years old are a population with clear needs but unique challenges regarding the application of artificial pancreas (AP) technologies. Young children are likely to benefit from an AP system, with current deficits in glycemic control that include both significant hypoglycemia and sub-optimal HbA1c levels; however, they have undeveloped abilities to control and interact with the AP system, posing potential safety issues. During the hours that these children are away from their parents at school and elsewhere, they lack the sophistication to operate the currently-available tools in an AP system--and may induce harm if they are allowed to do so, causing parental resistance to AP use. Commercially-available insulin pumps have mechanisms to lock access to children to prevent inappropriate insulin-delivery. However, the AP is more complex than an insulin pump, both in requiring more detailed setting information (that a child could adversely alter) and in providing alerts for impending low- and high-blood glucose (BG) levels (that one wouldn't want to lock out to child use). These functions are all run via a platform on a smart phone-a device with which young children may already feel a high degree of familiarity and thus be more likely to attempt to explore and potentially change settings. It is likely that young children will benefit the most from a system that gives them access to some AP features but provides access to other features only for their parents. In this sense, young children require a device that is not user-centered as much as family-centered. A redesign of the system to provide appropriate access to AP tools-in which certain users can obtain access to certain functionalities-is direly needed before children in this age range can benefit from the improvements in blood glucose (BG) control that the AP has to offer.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

12

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, Vereinigte Staaten, 22903
        • University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

5 Jahre bis 9 Jahre (Kind)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes,

    • The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is based on the investigator's judgment
    • C peptide levels and antibody determinations are not required
  • Daily insulin therapy for ≥ 12 months
  • Insulin pump therapy for ≥ 3 months
  • Age ≥5 - ≤8 years old
  • Avoidance of acetaminophen-containing medications (i.e. Tylenol) while wearing the continuous glucose monitor.
  • Willingness to wear a continuous glucose sensor and physiological monitor for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

The presence of any of the following is an exclusion for the study:

  • Diabetic ketoacidosis in the past month
  • Hypoglycemic seizure or loss of consciousness in the past 3 months
  • History of seizure disorder (except for hypoglycemic seizure)
  • History of any heart disease including coronary artery disease, heart failure, or arrhythmias
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Current use of oral glucocorticoids, beta-blockers or other medications, which in the judgment of the investigator would be a contraindication to participation in the study.
  • History of ongoing renal disease (other than microalbuminuria).
  • Subjects requiring intermediate or long-acting insulin (such as NPH, Detemir or Glargine).
  • Subjects requiring other anti-diabetic medications other than insulin (oral or injectable).
  • Presence of a febrile illness within 24 hours of admission or acetaminophen use while wearing the CGM. The subject may be rescheduled for Research House/Hotel Admission if these criteria are not met. The study subject will not participate in the trial if these conditions are met.

  • Medical or psychiatric condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as:

    • Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months
    • Uncontrolled adrenal insufficiency

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Group A
In this randomized, cross-over study, the intervention involves blood glucose control using a Closed Loop system run by the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) during a stay at a Research House/Hotel. All subjects will have blood glucose data compared between their usual diabetes care (at home, using home insulin pump) and this Closed-Loop care (at Research House/Hotel using the DiAs system). Subjects who are randomized to Group A will have home care evaluated before the Research House/Hotel admission. Subjects in this arm will participate in CGM training and data collection prior to the Research House/Hotel admission.
Gerät: Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) with Closed-Loop
All subjects will use DiAs Medical Platform, a study insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in closed-loop mode during a Research House/Hotel admission that will last up to 72 hours.
Experimental: Group B
Group B is identical to Group A with the exception that usual diabetes care (at home, using home insulin pump) will be evaluated after the Research House/Hotel admission. Subjects who are randomized to Group B will participate in CGM training and data collection after the Research House/Hotel admission. As with Group A, all subjects will use Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) with Closed-Loop during the admission.
Gerät: Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) with Closed-Loop
All subjects will use DiAs Medical Platform, a study insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in closed-loop mode during a Research House/Hotel admission that will last up to 72 hours.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percent of Sensor Glucose Readings Between 70-180 mg/dL
Zeitfenster: 68 hours
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
68 hours

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are <70 mg/dL
Zeitfenster: 68 hours
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
68 hours
Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >150 mg/dL
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours
Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >180 mg/dL
Zeitfenster: 68 hours
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
68 hours
Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >250 mg/dL
Zeitfenster: 68 hours
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
68 hours
Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >400 mg/dL
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours
Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Maximum, Minimum, Median, Interquartile Range, Mean, Standard Deviation)
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours
Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Maximum)
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours
Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Minimum)
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours
Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Median/Interquartile Range)
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours
Mean BG (as Measured by CGM)
Zeitfenster: 68 hours
All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
68 hours
Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve <60
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours
Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve <70 mg/dL
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours
Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve >180
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours
Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve >250 mg/dL
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours
Incidence of Hypoglycemia Per Subject, Defined by Handheld Meter Glucose <70 mg/dL
Zeitfenster: 68 hours
All subjects have hypoglycemia monitored by meter analysis and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
68 hours
End of Night Blood Glucose
Zeitfenster: 72 hours
All subjects have blood glucose evaluated upon rising (approximately 7 am) and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.
72 hours

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

University of Virginia

Mitarbeiter

DexCom, Inc.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Mark D. DeBoer, MD, University of Virginia, Pediatrics, Endocrinology/Diabetes

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Nützliche Links

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Mai 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Mai 2016

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Mai 2016

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

15. April 2016

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

20. April 2016

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

25. April 2016

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. Juli 2017

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

22. Juni 2017

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2017

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 18888

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Not yet determined

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Diabetes mellitus, Typ 1

Klinische Studien zur Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) with Closed-Loop

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in South Africa

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren