Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Peer MI in FQHCs for Substance-using Emerging Adults

28. November 2018 aktualisiert von: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Peer-enhanced Motivational Interviewing in Federally-Qualified Health Clinics for Substance-using Emerging Adults

The main purpose of this study is to test whether a Peer-Enhanced Motivational Interviewing (PMI) intervention, which has been successful with college students, results in superior alcohol and marijuana use outcomes for emerging adults (EA), ages 18-29, who are clients of Federally-qualified Health Centers, and their peers. In the first phase of the study, seventy-five peer dyads (total n = 150, ntarget client = 75, npeer = 75) will be randomized to receive either Peer-Enhanced Motivational Interviewing (PMI), Motivational Interviewing only (MI) or Waitlist Control (WC.) In the second, expanded phase of the study, an additional 325 peer dyads (total n = 650, ntarget client = 325, npeer = 325) will be randomized to receive either Peer-Enhanced Motivational Interviewing, Motivational Interviewing only (MI) or Waitlist Control.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

This project randomizes peer dyads, consisting of one Emerging Adult (EA), 18-29 years old, who both has a substance use problem and attends a Federally-qualified Health Center (i.e. target client), and one peer, to one of three conditions. In the Peer-Enhanced Motivational Interviewing (PMI) condition, target clients and peers will receive separate one-hour sessions of Motivational Interviewing (MI), an empirically-supported treatment that helps individuals work through ambivalence about making changes in substance use. MI is thought to work because it is a non-confrontational intervention where a therapist empathetically reviews substance use behaviors, listens empathetically, and reinforces any client statements indicating a desire to change. With the "peer" of each PMI dyad, the therapist presents peer with data about the extent of the target client's substance use, builds the peer's motivation to help their friend, and teaches the peer communication skills they can use to influence the target client's substance use. In the Motivational Interviewing only (MI) condition, the target client alone will receive the MI intervention with no peer participation. In the Waitlist (WC) condition, target clients and peers can receive the intervention at 2 months into the follow-up period for the PMI group.

The main purpose of this study is to test whether a Peer-Enhanced Motivational Interviewing (PMI) intervention, which has been successful with college students, results in superior alcohol and marijuana use outcomes for emerging adults (EA), ages 18-29, who are clients of Federally-qualified Health Centers, and their peers. Seventy-five peer dyads (total n = 150, ntarget client = 75, npeer = 75) will be randomized to receive either Peer-Enhanced Motivational Interviewing (PMI), Motivational Interviewing only (MI) or Waitlist Control (WC.)

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Voraussichtlich)

150

Phase

  • Phase 2

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

    • Illinois
      • Urbana, Illinois, Vereinigte Staaten, 61801
        • School of Social Work

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 29 Jahre (Erwachsene)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For the Target Client

    1. Score 5 or higher on the AUDIT-C measure and/or use alcohol or marijuana 13 days or more out of the past 90 days,
    2. Have a friend that they are willing to refer to the study to be their 'peer' (support) and that peer agrees to participate,
    3. Are able to complete baseline and follow-up assessments and have a valid email,
    4. Are willing to be video recorded, and
    5. Are fluent in English
  • For the Peer

    1. Have weekly contact with the participating Target Client who referred them,
    2. Are will to attend all study procedures (i.e. baseline assessment, intervention, follow up),
    3. Are willing to be video record,
    4. Are fluent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For the Target Client

    1. Are current students in the lead Investigator's classes,
    2. Are seeking residential treatment at the time of the screening call,
    3. Are incarcerated or court-ordered to receive treatment at the time of the screening call,
    4. Use drugs besides marijuana or alcohol over 45 of the past 90 days.
  • For the Peer

    1. Are current students in the lead Investigator's classes,
    2. Are seeking residential treatment at the time of the screening call,
    3. Are incarcerated or court-ordered to receive treatment at the time of the screening call,
    4. Use drugs besides marijuana or alcohol over 45 of the past 90 days,
    5. Are romantic partners of the Target Client

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Peer-enhanced Motivational Interviewing
In the Peer-Enhanced Motivational Interviewing (PMI) condition, target clients and peers will receive separate one-hour sessions of Motivational Interviewing (MI), an empirically-supported treatment that helps individuals work through ambivalence about making changes in substance use. Mi is thought to work because it is a non-confrontational intervention where a therapist empathetically reviews substance use behaviors, listens empathetically, and reinforces any client statements indicating a desire to change. With the "peer" of each PMI dyad, the therapist presents peer with data about the extent of the target client's substance use, builds the peer's motivation to help their friend, and teaches the peer communication skills they can use to influence the target client's substance use.
In the Peer-Enhanced Motivational Interviewing (PMI) condition, target clients and peers will receive separate one-hour sessions of Motivational Interviewing (MI), an empirically-supported treatment that helps individuals work through ambivalence about making changes in substance use. MI is thought to work because it is a non-confrontational intervention where a therapist empathetically reviews substance use behaviors, listens empathetically, and reinforces any client statements indicating a desire to change. With the "peer" of each PMI dyad, the therapist presents peer with data about the extent of the target client's substance use, builds the peer's motivation to help their friend, and teaches the peer communication skills they can use to influence the target client's substance use.
Andere Namen:
  • PMI
Aktiver Komparator: Motivational Interviewing
In the Motivational Interviewing (MI) condition, target clients only will receive one-hour sessions of Motivational Interviewing (MI), an empirically-supported treatment that helps individuals work through ambivalence about making changes in substance use.
In the Motivational Interviewing (PMI) condition, target clients only will receive one-hour sessions of Motivational Interviewing (MI), an empirically-supported treatment that helps individuals work through ambivalence about making changes in substance use. MI is thought to work because it is a non-confrontational intervention where a therapist empathetically reviews substance use behaviors, listens empathetically, and reinforces any client statements indicating a desire to change.
Andere Namen:
  • MI
Placebo-Komparator: Waitlist Control
Those dyads randomized to the Waitlist Control (WC) condition willl be offered teh PMI intervention at month 2 post-intervention for the PMI arm.
In the Peer-Enhanced Motivational Interviewing (PMI) condition, target clients and peers will receive separate one-hour sessions of Motivational Interviewing (MI), an empirically-supported treatment that helps individuals work through ambivalence about making changes in substance use. MI is thought to work because it is a non-confrontational intervention where a therapist empathetically reviews substance use behaviors, listens empathetically, and reinforces any client statements indicating a desire to change. With the "peer" of each PMI dyad, the therapist presents peer with data about the extent of the target client's substance use, builds the peer's motivation to help their friend, and teaches the peer communication skills they can use to influence the target client's substance use.
Andere Namen:
  • PMI
Dyads randomized to this intervention will have no contact with study personnel until 2 months after the PMI group has completed the PMI intervention. Then those in the Waitlist Control condition will receive the full PMI protocol.
Andere Namen:
  • Toilette

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change: Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) Substance Problem Scale
Zeitfenster: Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period
A 16-item scale composed of lifetime symptoms of substance abuse, dependence, and substance-induced health and psychological disorders based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) -IV.
Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change: Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire (MACQ)
Zeitfenster: Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period
A 50-item self-report measure modeled after the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ) assessing marijuana problems over the past 6 months. A 6-month time frame was chosen to adequately capture potential infrequent consequences among marijuana users. Each item is rated dichotomously (yes/no) to indicate whether the marijuana-related problem occurred in the last 6 months.
Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period
Change: Days of Combined Cannabis and Alcohol Use
Zeitfenster: Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period
Past month measure of days (out of past 30) when participant used both marijuana and alcohol (based on Stein et al., 2018)
Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period
Change: Days of Cannabis and Binge Alcohol Use
Zeitfenster: Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period
Past month measure of days (out of past 30) of use of either substance. Binge drinking calculated from Time-Line Follow-Back (TLFB) as number of days of consuming 4+ (females)/5+ (males) drinks. Items drawn from GAIN's Substance Frequency Scale.
Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period
Change: Drinking Consequences
Zeitfenster: Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period
From the Rutgers Alcohol Problems Index and used to indicate indicates the frequency of experiencing negative consequences due to alcohol use.
Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period
Change: Urine Testing
Zeitfenster: Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period
National Institute of Drub Abuse-approved urine test kit to determine presence of Marijuana metabolites in urine.
Baseline and at month 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 post-intervention period

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Douglas C Smith, PhD, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign School of Social Work

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Voraussichtlich)

1. August 2019

Primärer Abschluss (Voraussichtlich)

1. Februar 2024

Studienabschluss (Voraussichtlich)

1. Februar 2024

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

6. November 2018

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

28. November 2018

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

29. November 2018

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

29. November 2018

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

28. November 2018

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. November 2018

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • Smith17393FQHC

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Substanzgebrauchsstörungen

Klinische Studien zur Peer-enhanced Motivational Interviewing

Abonnieren