Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Use of Illustrated Material in Communication With the Patient in the Mechanical Ventilator

28. Februar 2020 aktualisiert von: Bircan Kolcak, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi

The Effect of Using Illustrated Communication Material on Anxiety and Comfort in Communication With Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilator: Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

This study was carried out to determine the effect of the use of communication material on the anxiety and comfort of the patient in communication with patients receiving mechanical ventilators.As a result, the use of communication material reduces anxiety and increases patient satisfaction and comfort level. In communicating with intubated patients receiving mechanical ventilator therapy, the use of illustrated communication material is recommended.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

The use ofcommunication material in communication with patients receiving mechanical ventilator support increases patient satisfaction and reduces communication difficulties. However, there was no randomized controlled clinical study showing the effect of the use of these materials on patient care outcomes such as anxiety and comfort level.Patients were randomly assigned to the control groups using illustrated communication material and intervention and routine communication methods. The research was carried out in three stages: preoperative, intensive care and one day after surgery. The primary outcomes of the study were pain, anxiety and comfort levels of the patients. Secondary outcomes were the patients' satisfaction with hemodynamic parameters and communication method.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

60

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 65 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Having undergone cardiac surgery
  2. Being applied mechanical ventilator therapy
  3. Being 18 or over
  4. To have scored minimum 2 to maximum 2 from Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS)
  5. Agree to participate in the research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. not knowing Turkish
  2. Having vision and hearing loss,
  3. Having a cognitive or psychological problem that prevents them from communicating. 4. Having an intubation experience before

5. Bleeding, etc. in the early postoperative period. industrial development such as undergoing revision surgery or needing additional sedation,

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Kein Eingriff: Kontrollgruppe
kein Eingriff
Experimental: intervention group
In the intervention group, communication was established with the illustrated communication material. The pain, anxiety scores, and hemodynamic data of the patients were recorded by the intensive care nurse in three consecutive measurements starting with the first communication (0th minute) and at 30th and 60th minutes. On the first postoperative day, the satisfaction of the communication established with them, as well as their evaluations regarding the adequacy of this communication and their comfort levels were determined during the time they received mechanical ventilation therapy.
Illustrated communication material was introduced to the patients in the intervention group. In the process (intensive care) that patients received mechanical ventilation support after the operation, agitation and sedation levels were monitored by the intensive care nurse who was to communicate with the patient using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS). According to this scale, having minimum -2 and maximum +2 points was accepted as the starting criteria for communication (Sessler et al., 2002). Communication was established with the illustrated communication material.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
change of anxiety over time
Zeitfenster: The anxiety scores were recorded by the intensive care nurse in three consecutive measurements starting with the first communication (0th minute) and at 30th and 60th minutes
it was measured by using the Faces Anxiety Scale
The anxiety scores were recorded by the intensive care nurse in three consecutive measurements starting with the first communication (0th minute) and at 30th and 60th minutes
comfort level
Zeitfenster: 1 day after surgery
Postoperative comfort levels of the patients were determined by the Early Postoperative Comfort Scale.The highest total score that can be obtained from the scale is 144, and the lowest total score is 24. High scores show that comfort is good, and low scores show that comfort is depraved
1 day after surgery

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
hemodynamic data
Zeitfenster: Hemodynamic data were recorded through the patient monitor by intensive care nurses in three consecutive measurements starting with the first communication (0th minute) and at 30th and 60th minutes
hemodynamic data are systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, and peripheral oxygen
Hemodynamic data were recorded through the patient monitor by intensive care nurses in three consecutive measurements starting with the first communication (0th minute) and at 30th and 60th minutes
communication satisfaction and adequacy of communication techniqu, change of pain over time
Zeitfenster: Pain data were recorded as 30th and 60th minutes, starting from the first communication (0th minute) in mechanical ventilation. Satisfaction and adequacy of communication were evaluated an average of 24 hours after surgery
It is stated that numerical scales have been adopted more in clinical practice because they are useful in facilitating the definition of pain intensity, facilitating scoring and recording, and evaluating ceiling and floor effects. "The Numerical Evaluation Scale" was used to determine the pain levels of patients and to evaluate their satisfaction with the communication method used and the adequacy of the method
Pain data were recorded as 30th and 60th minutes, starting from the first communication (0th minute) in mechanical ventilation. Satisfaction and adequacy of communication were evaluated an average of 24 hours after surgery

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: bircan kolcak, lecturer, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Faculty of Nursing, Ankara, Turkey

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

15. Januar 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

20. April 2017

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. Juni 2017

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

17. Februar 2020

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

28. Februar 2020

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

3. März 2020

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

3. März 2020

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

28. Februar 2020

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Februar 2020

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 16161616

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

options collected on this subject will be shared in a way that they can be used by other researchers.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

This work is only available after publication

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

it was approved by the responsible researcher of the study to share this study.

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur illustrated communication material

3
Abonnieren