Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Esketamine Versus Sufentanil for Sedation in Patients Undergoing ERCP (ES-ERCP)

10. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Ren Da

Effects of Esketamine-Propofol Versus Sufentanil-Propofol Sedation on Hypoxemia and Hypotension During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

This study compares two anesthesia medications, esketamine and sufentanil, used together with propofol during ERCP procedures. The goal is to find out which combination provides better safety and comfort for people undergoing ERCP.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either esketamine or sufentanil during sedation. Researchers will monitor blood oxygen levels, blood pressure, and recovery time during and after the procedure to evaluate safety and effectiveness.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

This randomized controlled trial compares the effects of intravenous esketamine and intravenous sufentanil as adjuncts to propofol sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

The study aims to evaluate differences in intraoperative hemodynamic stability, oxygenation, sedation quality, and recovery profiles between the two sedation strategies.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either esketamine or sufentanil in combination with propofol during the ERCP procedure. Sedation will be titrated to achieve an adequate level of sedation based on clinical assessment.

Standard monitoring will be applied throughout the procedure, including continuous pulse oximetry and non-invasive blood pressure measurement at predefined time points. Hemodynamic instability, including hypotension and oxygen desaturation, will be managed according to predefined clinical protocols.

Adverse events will be recorded throughout the perioperative period and assessed for severity and relatedness to the study interventions.

The study is designed to reflect routine clinical anesthesia practice while systematically comparing two commonly used adjunct analgesic strategies for procedural sedation in ERCP patients.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

530

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged ≥18 years
  • Patients scheduled to undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 30 kg/m²
  • Patients requiring sedation for ERCP
  • Ability to provide written informed consent voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or contraindication to propofol, esketamine, sufentanil, or related medications
  • Severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg)
  • Severe dysfunction of the heart, lungs, liver, or kidneys
  • History of central nervous system disorders or psychiatric disorders
  • Anticipated difficult airway
  • History of psychiatric disorders or contraindications to ketamine use
  • Inability to communicate or provide informed consent
  • Requirement for general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation or intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia with intubation

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Esketamine arm
Participants receive intravenous esketamine in combination with propofol for procedural sedation during ERCP. Esketamine is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation, while propofol is continuously infused and titrated according to clinical sedation requirements.
Arzneimittel: Esketamine
Intravenous esketamine is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation for ERCP. It is used in combination with continuously infused propofol, with dosing titrated to achieve adequate procedural sedation. This regimen differs from the comparator arm in that esketamine is used as the primary analgesic agent instead of an opioid.
Aktiver Komparator: Sufentanil arm
Participants receive intravenous sufentanil in combination with propofol for procedural sedation during ERCP. Sufentanil is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation, while propofol is continuously infused and titrated according to clinical sedation requirements.
Arzneimittel: Sufentanil
Intravenous sufentanil is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation for ERCP. It is used in combination with continuously infused propofol, with dosing titrated to achieve adequate procedural sedation. This regimen differs from the comparator arm in that sufentanil is used as the opioid-based analgesic instead of esketamine.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia
Zeitfenster: Six time points:T0, upon arrival in the procedure room (baseline); T1, after anesthesia induction; T2, when the endoscope passed the vocal cords; T3, when the endoscope passed the duodenal papilla; T4, at the end of the procedure; and T5, upon recovery.
Hypoxemia is defined as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) < 90% lasting ≥ 10 seconds. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) were recorded at six predefined time points: T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5.
Six time points:T0, upon arrival in the procedure room (baseline); T1, after anesthesia induction; T2, when the endoscope passed the vocal cords; T3, when the endoscope passed the duodenal papilla; T4, at the end of the procedure; and T5, upon recovery.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Incidence of intraoperative hypotension
Zeitfenster: Six time points:T0, upon arrival in the procedure room (baseline); T1, after anesthesia induction; T2, when the endoscope passed the vocal cords; T3, when the endoscope passed the duodenal papilla; T4, at the end of the procedure; and T5, upon recovery.
Hypotension was defined as a reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥30% from baseline or a systolic arterial pressure (SAP) <90 mmHg. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at six predefined time points: T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5.
Six time points:T0, upon arrival in the procedure room (baseline); T1, after anesthesia induction; T2, when the endoscope passed the vocal cords; T3, when the endoscope passed the duodenal papilla; T4, at the end of the procedure; and T5, upon recovery.

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
induction time
Zeitfenster: During anesthesia induction
Time from administration of the study drug to successful insertion of the endoscope
During anesthesia induction
Recovery time
Zeitfenster: From the end of the procedure to recovery from sedation
Time from discontinuation of propofol administration to recovery of consciousness, defined as achieving an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) score of 5. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating a higher level of alertness. Recovery was defined as achieving an OAA/S score of 5 (responds readily to name spoken in a normal tone).
From the end of the procedure to recovery from sedation
Patient body movements
Zeitfenster: Throughout the procedure
Number of patient body movements during the procedure requiring additional propofol administration or interfering with the procedure
Throughout the procedure
Endoscopist satisfaction
Zeitfenster: Immediately after completion of the procedure
Endoscopist satisfaction with sedation conditions, assessed using a 10-point numeric rating scale (1 = extremely dissatisfied, 10 = extremely satisfied).
Immediately after completion of the procedure
Patient satisfaction
Zeitfenster: Before discharge from the recovery room (PACU)
Patient satisfaction with the anesthesia experience, assessed using a 10-point numeric rating scale (1 = extremely dissatisfied, 10 = extremely satisfied)
Before discharge from the recovery room (PACU)
Total propofol dose
Zeitfenster: From induction of sedation to the end of the procedure
The total amount of propofol administered during the procedure, including the induction dose and additional doses required to maintain adequate sedation
From induction of sedation to the end of the procedure
Aldrete recovery score
Zeitfenster: Upon arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and before discharge from PACU
Recovery from sedation was assessed using the modified Aldrete recovery score, which evaluates activity, respiration, circulation, consciousness, and oxygen saturation. The score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better recovery
Upon arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and before discharge from PACU
Airway intervention
Zeitfenster: From induction of sedation to the end of the procedure
The need for airway interventions to manage sedation-related respiratory compromise, including chin lift, jaw thrust, oral airway insertion, or mask ventilation during the procedure
From induction of sedation to the end of the procedure

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Ren Da

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

10. Juli 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

10. März 2028

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

10. März 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

3. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

10. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

14. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

14. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

10. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • BFHHZS20260216

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Erkrankungen der Gallenwege

Klinische Studien zur Esketamine

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Tunisia

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

3
Abonnieren