Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Contribución del Mapeo Genómico Óptico (OGM) en el Diagnóstico de Múltiples Malformaciones Congénitas Con o Sin Discapacidad Intelectual Sin Anomalía Genética (CARTOGEN-N)

3 de noviembre de 2026 actualizado por: Céline PEBREL-RICHARD

Contribución del Mapeo Genómico Óptico (OGM) en el Diagnóstico de Múltiples Malformaciones Congénitas Con o Sin Discapacidad Intelectual Sin Anomalía Genética Detectada por Secuenciación del Genoma Completo

Congenital malformations result from an embryonic or foetal developmental disorder (DD) affecting one or more systems (cardiac, skeletal, nervous, etc.). These are referred to as multiple congenital anomalies (MCAs). They may be associated with an intellectual disability (ID)1.

Chromosomal analysis on Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) and gene panels or exome sequencing are the respective gold standard methods for chromosomal and molecular diagnosis of DD respectively2. In cases where no diagnosis is established after these first-line tests, short-read whole genome sequencing (WGS), via the Plan France Medicine Genomic 2020-2025 (AURAGEN), may be considered. This approach allows for diagnosis in nearly 40% of patients with DD3,4. However, many patients remain in diagnostic deadlock, likely due to the technical limitations of these methods, which potentially be overcome by emerging methodologies such as optical genome mapping (OGM)5,6,7,8,9. The investigators propose to systematically perform OGM in 30 patients presenting with MCA+/-ID who have inconclusive WGS result10.

The main objective is to assess the contribution of OGM in identifying structural variants not detected or poorly characterised by WGS in this clinical context. This work will also contribute to the ongoing of OGM in routine diagnostics and determine its role in the overall genetic diagnosis of MCA+/-ID. Additionally it may lead to the identification of new candidate genes and/or mechanisms of pathogenicity. If the results are promising, further clinical could expand this preliminary work into a larger-scale project. Improving the genetic diagnosis of DD should enhance the medical management of patients, currently in diagnostic deadlock, and their families.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Study Workflow

Pre-analytical Phase

Participation in the study will be offered to all patients meeting the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria by an investigator from the Department of Genetics, during a medical consultation in which the non-contributive whole-genome sequencing (WGS) result will have been communicated (Figure 1). Information regarding the study procedures and objectives will be provided at that time. The information sheet and consent form will be given to the patient (if an adult) or to the holders of parental authority (if the patient is a minor). After obtaining consent for both the genetic investigations and participation in the research project, the patient may be enrolled in the study. Blood samples required for the study will be collected, transferred to the laboratory, and secured for analysis according to the following protocol:

Patient > 20 kg:

2 × 5 mL EDTA blood tubes

  1. × 5 mL heparinized blood tube

    Patient 12-20 kg:

  2. × 5 mL EDTA blood tubes

Patient 5-12 kg:

1 × 5 mL EDTA blood tube

Samples will be sent to the Cytogenetics Department, where they will be pseudonymized and secured. At least three aliquots of 1.5 mL EDTA blood and the remaining volume will be frozen at -80 °C for DNA extraction and long-fragment DNA extraction. A cell culture (peripheral blood lymphocytes) will also be performed to obtain a fixed chromosomal pellet from the heparinized tube, when available. If the heparinized sample is not available and the results of optical genome mapping require confirmation of a chromosomal abnormality by karyotype or FISH (i.e., contributive result), a second blood draw will be proposed during the clinical results-return consultation.

Analysis Frozen samples from the Cytogenetics Department of Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital (one per patient) will be transferred via TSE to the Department of Genetics at Reims University Hospital, designated to perform optical genome mapping while awaiting installation of the Saphyr scanner at Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital (DAN 2025 application).

Extraction, labeling, and imaging of long DNA molecules will be performed using the manufacturer's kits, following the provided instructions.

Results and Interpretation

Raw data will be analyzed and validated by cytogeneticists at Reims University Hospital using Bionano Access and Solve® software. Data will also be securely shared with the project lead, responsible for:

Performing a second independent analysis (with Bionano Access and Solve, available in the Cytogenetics Department), leveraging expertise acquired through participation in previous projects.

Providing final interpretation of results and disseminating clinically relevant findings for patient management.

Each sample will therefore benefit from dual review and dual expertise, ensuring the reliability of the results.

Parental segregation studies may be proposed to facilitate biological interpretation. If needed, collection of parental samples and consent procedures will be coordinated by the Department of Medical Genetics at Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital. Conclusive results will be communicated to the clinician who prescribed the WGS for patient management and genetic counselling.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

55

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Clermont-Ferrand, Francia
        • Reclutamiento
        • CHU clermont-Ferrand
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Céline PEBREL-RICHARD

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients presenting with at least two congenital anomalies, with or without intellectual disability, and weighing more than 5 kg.
  • Whole-genome sequencing performed by the AURAGEN laboratory deemed non-contributive (absence of class 4 or 5 variants, or identification of a VUS, or identification of only one variant in the context of a recessive disorder).
  • Patient covered by a social security scheme.
  • Patient able to understand and to oppose participation in the study.
  • Written informed consent for genetic analyses, signed either by the patient or by their legal representatives (for minors), after clear and fair information about the study has been provided.

Non-Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients for whom a non-genetic cause (infectious, environmental, or toxic) has been previously identified.
  • Inability to obtain a compliant sample.
  • Patient or holder of parental authority under guardianship or legal protection, deprived of liberty, or placed under court-ordered protection.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Diagnóstico
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: un solo brazo de pacientes con malformaciones congénitas

A blood sample will be collected after obtaining consent from the patient and/or their legal guardians. The number of tubes required (1 to 3) will be determined according to the patient's weight, for the purpose of performing optical genome mapping and any necessary confirmatory analyses in the event that a structural variant is identified.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
diagnostic yield of optical genome mapping (OGM) in multiple congenital anomalies with or without intellectual disability when whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is non-contributive
Periodo de tiempo: day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)

Assessing the diagnostic yield of optical genome mapping (OGM) in multiple congenital anomalies with or without intellectual disability when whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is non-contributive (absence of causal genetic variation or detection of a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) or a single variant in a recessive disorder).

day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Número de pacientes en los que se identifica un nuevo gen candidato/mecanismo patogénico
Periodo de tiempo: día 1 (inclusión y extracción de sangre)
día 1 (inclusión y extracción de sangre)
Number of reclassified variants intially considered as VUS (Variants of Uncertain/Unknown Signification)
Periodo de tiempo: day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)

Assessment of the number of variants initially classified as VUS (variants of uncertain/unknown significance) that were reclassified as benign or pathogenic variants

day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)
Evaluation of the feasibility (duration) of the technique in current practice in 1st-line, 2nd-line (after routine tests such as chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing…), or 3rd-line in the case of non-contributive WGS based on several criteria
Periodo de tiempo: day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)

Evaluation of technical duration (hours)

day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)
Evaluation of the feasibility of the technique (failure) in current practice in 1st-line, 2nd-line (after routine tests such as chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing…), or 3rd-line in the case of non-contributive WGS based on several criteria
Periodo de tiempo: day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)

failure rate number

day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)
Evaluation of the feasibility of the technique (reprocessing) in current practice in 1st-line, 2nd-line (after routine tests such as chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing…), or 3rd-line in the case of non-contributive WGS based on several criteria
Periodo de tiempo: day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)

reprocessing rate number

day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)
Evaluation of the feasibility of the technique (interpretation) in current practice in 1st-line, 2nd-line (after routine tests such as chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing…), or 3rd-line in the case of non-contributive WGS based on several criteria
Periodo de tiempo: day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)

Evaluation of biological interpretation time (hours)

day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)
Assess the impact of using these new technologies on patient management.
Periodo de tiempo: day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)

Percentage of patients for whom the OGM results led to a change in clinical management.

day 1 (inclusion and blood collection)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Silla de estudio: Lise LACLAUTRE, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

18 de noviembre de 2025

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

18 de noviembre de 2029

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

18 de noviembre de 2029

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

9 de diciembre de 2025

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

20 de enero de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

27 de enero de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

4 de noviembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de noviembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de noviembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • AOI 2024 PEBREL-RICHARD

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .