Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

Kliininen tutkimus fluorittomien COL 101 (arginiini) hampaiden turvallisuuden ja kariesta ehkäisevän tehon arvioimiseksi verrattuna 0,24 % natriumfluoripitoiseen (1100 ppm F) hammastahnakontrolliin 10–14-vuotiailla lapsilla

maanantai 20. heinäkuuta 2026 päivittänyt: Colgate Palmolive

Vaiheen 2 satunnaistettu, kaksoissokkoutettu, aktiivisesti kontrolloitu monikeskustutkimus, jolla arvioitiin fluorittomien COL 101 (arginiini) hampaiden, joissa on 1,5 %, 4,0 % ja 8,0 % arginiinia, turvallisuutta ja kariesta ehkäisevää tehoa. 0,24 % natriumfluoridia (1100 ppm F) hammastahnakontrolli 10–14-vuotiaille lapsille

Tämän tutkimuksen tavoitteena on arvioida COL101 (arginiini) ei-fluoridihammastahnojen turvallisuutta ja kariesta ehkäisevää tehoa verrattuna 0,24 % natriumfluoridipitoiseen hampaiden puhdistusaineeseen 10-14-vuotiailla lapsilla vuoden aikana.

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Tila

Valmis

Ehdot

Interventio / Hoito

Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus

In this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled multi-center study, 2025 subjects were randomized in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 into one of four parallel study groups (1.5% arginine dentifrice, 4.0% arginine dentifrice, 8.0% arginine dentifrice or 0.24% NaF dentifrice with no arginine). Subjects were asked to brush their teeth twice daily at home (unsupervised use) with the assigned dentifrice for a duration of 1 year. Measurements for efficacy, safety and assessment of product use compliance were conducted at baseline, 6 months (±1 month) and 1 year (±1 month). Additional safety evaluations including evaluation of oral soft and hard tissues, as well as product use compliance assessment was performed at 3 months and 9 months (±1 month). All subjects were monitored for adverse events (AEs) during the course of the study.

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Todellinen)

2025

Vaihe

  • Vaihe 2

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskelupaikat

  • Puerto Rico
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico
        • University of Puerto Rico School of Dental Medicine
  • Yhdysvallat
    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, Yhdysvallat, 92350
        • Loma Linda University School of Dentistry
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, Yhdysvallat, 32610
        • University of Florida College of Dentistry
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, Yhdysvallat, 46202-2876
        • Indiana University School of Dentistry
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Yhdysvallat, 02111
        • Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Yhdysvallat, 02142
        • The Forsyth Institute
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, Yhdysvallat, 14214
        • University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Yhdysvallat, 19104-6003
        • University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, Yhdysvallat, 78229-3900
        • UT Health San Antonio School of Dentistry

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

10 vuotta - 14 vuotta (Lapsi)

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Joo

Kuvaus

Sisällyttämiskriteerit:

  • Kaikki alla olevat kriteerit täyttävät koehenkilöt otetaan mukaan tutkimukseen:

    1. Tutkittavan suostumus ja vanhempien/huoltajien tietoinen suostumus vapaaehtoiseen osallistumiseen.
    2. Halu ja kyky käyttää määrättyjä tuotteita ohjeiden mukaisesti, saatavuus kaikkiin tapaamisiin ja kliinisen tutkimuksen valmistumisen todennäköisyys.
    3. Lapset ovat lähtötilanteessa 10-14-vuotiaita.
    4. Pysyvien toisten poskihampaiden läsnäolo tai todisteita vähintään yhdestä pysyvästä toisesta poskihampaasta, mikä osoittaa olkapään murtuman limakalvon läpi.
    5. Hyvä yleisterveys, josta on osoituksena sairaushistorian tarkastelu.
    6. Koehenkilöillä, joilla on tutkimukseen tullessa kaksi tai useampi aktiivinen kariesleesio (ICDAS-pisteet 2 tai enemmän) pysyvissä hampaissa ja aiempi karieskokemus (DMFT > 1), D = rappeutunut määritellään ICDAS-pisteiksi 3 tai enemmän.

Poissulkemiskriteerit:

  • Koehenkilöt, jotka täyttävät jonkin alla olevista kriteereistä, suljetaan pois tutkimuksesta:

    1. Kiinteän tai irrotettavan proteesin tai oikomishoidon, jossa on enemmän kuin neljä pysyvää hammasta, olemassaolo.

    2. Sellaisten lääkkeiden käyttö, jotka voivat lisätä hammaskarieksen kehittymisriskiä, ​​ts.

      lääkkeitä, jotka vähentävät syljeneritystä ja korkean sokeripitoisuuden omaavia.

    3. Pitkäaikainen antibioottihoito.
    4. Lapset, joilla on vahvistettu kognitiivinen ja/tai motorinen vajaatoiminta.
    5. Vaikea puute.
    6. Koehenkilöt, joilla on tutkimukseen tullessa vakava karies (ICDAS 5 tai 6) viidessä tai useammassa pysyvässä hampaassa.
    7. Todisteet kohtalaisesta tai vaikeasta parodontaalisairaudesta.
    8. Osallistuminen mihin tahansa muuhun kliiniseen tutkimukseen kliinisen tutkimuksen alkamista edeltäneiden 30 päivän aikana.
    9. Tunnettu allergioiden tai muiden haittavaikutusten esiintyminen arginiinille, suunhoitotuotteille tai niiden ainesosille.
    10. Itse ilmoittama raskaushistoria, aikomus tulla raskaaksi koeajan aikana tai imetys.

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Ennaltaehkäisy
  • Jako: Satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Nelinkertaistaa

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Active Comparator: 0,24 % natriumfluorihammastahna
Hammastahna
Lääke: 0,24 % natriumfluorihammastahna
Koko suun harjaus hammastahnalla, 2 kertaa päivässä 2 minuuttia kerrallaan tutkimuksen ajan
Kokeellinen: 1,5 % arginiinihammastahna
Hammastahna
Lääke: 1,5 % arginiinihammastahna
Koko suun harjaus hammastahnalla, 2 kertaa päivässä 2 minuuttia kerrallaan tutkimuksen ajan
Kokeellinen: 4,0 % arginiinia
Hammastahna
Lääke: 4,0 % arginiinia
Koko suun harjaus hammastahnalla, 2 kertaa päivässä 2 minuuttia kerrallaan tutkimuksen ajan
Kokeellinen: 8,0 % arginiinia
Hammastahna
Lääke: 8,0 % arginiinia
Koko suun harjaus hammastahnalla, 2 kertaa päivässä 2 minuuttia kerrallaan tutkimuksen ajan

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) Score Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of scorable tooth surfaces among the up to 128 examined surfaces in the subject's mouth that were determined by the examiner to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 128, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFS is defined as the change in DMFS score between two examinations performed at specified time points, calculated by subtraction.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) Score Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of scorable tooth surfaces among the up to 128 examined surfaces in the subject's mouth that were determined by the examiner to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 128, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFS is defined as the change in DMFS score between two examinations performed at specified time points, calculated by subtraction.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) Score Between the Month 6 and Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of scorable tooth surfaces among the up to 128 examined surfaces in the subject's mouth that were determined by the examiner to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 128, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFS is defined as the change in DMFS score between two examinations performed at specified time points, calculated by subtraction.
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) Score Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of the up to 28 examined teeth in the subject's mouth on which the examiner determined at least one surface to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 28, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFT is defined as the change in DMFT score between two examinations performed at specified time points, calculated by subtraction.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) Score Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of the up to 28 examined teeth in the subject's mouth on which the examiner determined at least one surface to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 28, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFT is defined as the change in DMFT score between two examinations performed at specified time points calculated by subtraction.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) Score Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of the up to 28 examined teeth in the subject's mouth on which the examiner determined at least one surface to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 28, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFT is defined as the change in DMFT score between two examinations performed at specified time points, calculated by subtraction.
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Severity Score Progressions Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 2 or higher; from a score of 1 or 2 to a score of 3 or higher; or from a score of 3 or 4 to a score of 5 or 6. Surfaces with scores between 0 and 4 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries severity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries progression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Severity Score Progressions Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 2 or higher; from a score of 1 or 2 to a score of 3 or higher; or from a score of 3 or 4 to a score of 5 or 6. Surfaces with scores between 0 and 4 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries severity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries progression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Severity Score Progressions Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 2 or higher; from a score of 1 or 2 to a score of 3 or higher; or from a score of 3 or 4 to a score of 5 or 6. Surfaces with scores between 0 and 4 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries severity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries progression was calculated.
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Severity Score Regressions Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score severity score regression on a tooth surface is defined as an improvement from a score of 2 or higher to a score of 0 or 1. Tooth surfaces for which the earlier score was between 2 and 6 are defined as being at risk for caries severity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries regression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Severity Score Regressions Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score severity score regression on a tooth surface is defined as an improvement from a score of 2 or higher to a score of 0 or 1. Tooth surfaces for which the earlier score was between 2 and 6 are defined as being at risk for caries severity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries regression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Severity Score Regressions Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score severity score regression on a tooth surface is defined as an improvement from a score of 2 or higher to a score of 0 or 1. Tooth surfaces for which the earlier score was between 2 and 6 are defined as being at risk for caries severity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries regression was calculated.
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Progressions Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 1. Surfaces with a score of 0 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity progression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Progressions Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 1. Surfaces with a score of 0 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity progression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Progressions Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 1. Surfaces with a score of 0 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity progression was calculated.
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Regressions Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score regression is defined as an improvement from a score of 1 to a score of 0. Surfaces with a score of 1 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity regression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Regressions Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score regression is defined as an improvement from a score of 1 to a score of 0. Surfaces with a score of 1 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity regression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Regressions Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 Visits
Aikaikkuna: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score regression is defined as an improvement from a score of 1 to a score of 0. Surfaces with a score of 1 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity regression was calculated
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Sponsori

Colgate Palmolive

Tutkijat

  • Opintojohtaja: Maria E Ryan, DDS PhD, Colgate-Palmolive Company

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)

Torstai 21. tammikuuta 2021

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Keskiviikko 28. helmikuuta 2024

Opintojen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Keskiviikko 28. helmikuuta 2024

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Maanantai 8. helmikuuta 2021

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Keskiviikko 10. helmikuuta 2021

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)

Torstai 11. helmikuuta 2021

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Tiistai 21. heinäkuuta 2026

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Maanantai 20. heinäkuuta 2026

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Keskiviikko 1. heinäkuuta 2026

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Avainsanat

Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja

Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot

  • CRO-2020-CAR-ARG-ED

Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)

Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?

EI

Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta

Joo

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta

Ei

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Tilaa