Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Étude sur la télésanté et la mémoire (TAMS)

24 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Donna Posluszny, University of Pittsburgh

TCC sur appareil mobile pour la dysfonction cognitive liée à la chimiothérapie : un essai contrôlé randomisé multicentrique

The overall purpose of this trial is to confirm the efficacy of Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT), a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for treatment of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction among (female or male) breast cancer survivors. This is a multi-center, multi-clinician randomized control trial (MAAT vs. supportive therapy attention control condition). This trial will also evaluate a sub-sample of survivors pre-and post treatment with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a working memory task to evaluate pre-to-post treatment brain activation patterns to elucidate underlying mechanisms of clinical therapeutic change.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

The primary aim of this multi-site, multi-clinician randomized controlled trial is to determine if Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT), a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention, can improve self-reported and objectively measured cognitive functioning in breast cancer survivors who previously received chemotherapy. Breast cancer survivors (Stage I-III) who were treated with chemotherapy 1-5 years prior to enrollment and who have subjective cognitive complaints may be eligible for this study. After eligibility is confirmed, participants will complete baseline assessments of subjective and objective memory and attention functioning as well as behavioral rating scales, and will be randomized to MAAT or Supportive Therapy (ST; to control for therapist time and attention) for 8 weeks. Both treatments (MAAT and ST) will be delivered through videoconferencing using mobile (smartphone, laptop or other electronic device) in order to reduce survivor travel or time away from work or family. Data collection methods will include telephone- and web-administered measures of subjective and objective cognitive function, as well as various behavioral ratings. Outcome assessments will be conducted post-treatment and at 6-month follow-up. It is hypothesized that MAAT participants will have significantly improved scores of self-reported cognitive impairments and objective neurocognitive test scores (on verbal memory and processing speed) at post-treatment and 6-month follow-up compared to participants randomized to ST. In addition, willing and eligible participants will be asked to complete a functional MRI working memory task at baseline and post-treatment, to examine whether those who receive MAAT show greater increase in brain network activation than those who receive ST. This may advance understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying improvement of objective and self-reported cognitive function after chemotherapy. The sample size (n=100/group) will allow for a 10-15% drop out-rate and still provide 80% power to detect group differences using two (Group: MAAT vs. ST) by 3 (time: baseline, posttreatment, 6-month follow-up) ANCOVA at alpha=0.05. Potential baseline differences between MAAT and ST groups on primary outcome variables or other factors that may affect cognition (e.g., anxiety, fatigue or depression) will be evaluated as potential covariates, although such differences due to randomization are not anticipated.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

194

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, États-Unis, 46202
        • Indiana University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 15232
        • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of stage I-III breast cancer
  2. 1-5 years post-treatment and currently disease free
  3. Treatment involved adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  4. Report cognitive problems of memory and concentration attributed to chemotherapy with a score of 10 or below on the FACT-Cog Impact on Quality of Life Scale (a score ~1SD below pre-chemotherapy treatment norms; this criterion was used in our prior R21 study, ensures a clinically meaningful level of cognitive concerns,41 and discriminates high and low PCI scores in prior research42)
  5. Able to speak and read English
  6. Age >18
  7. Able to provide IRB-approved written informed consent
  8. Willing to use videoconferencing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous CNS radiation, intrathecal therapy, or CNS-involved surgery
  2. Previous cancer history with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer
  3. Previous exposure to chemotherapy with another cancer or due to other medical condition (e.g., methotrexate exposure for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis)
  4. Significant neurodevelopmental, neurobehavioral, or medical risk factors likely to affect cognitive functioning (e.g., history of neurological disorder or TBI of greater than mild severity, such as loss of consciousness >30 minutes, medical disorder that is unstable or likely to affect cognition such as metabolic disorder, heart attack or stroke, uncontrolled diabetes or endocrine dysfunction)
  5. Currently meeting DSM-5 mental disorder criteria, including but not limited to neurodevelopmental, substance abuse, mood (e.g., Maj.Dep), anxiety, or psychotic disorders
  6. Scoring 3 or below on the 6-item cognitive screen designed to detect severe memory disorders;43
  7. Severe uncorrected sensory impairment (severe hearing or visual impairment)

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Tripler

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT)

A videoconference-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for treatment of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) among cancer survivors consisting of 8 weekly 45-minute visits with a survivor workbook, that targets: 1) enhancement of survivor self-awareness of "at risk" situations where memory failures occur; 2) emotion regulation through modification of survivor causal attributions and negative cognitive appraisals of memory failures; and 3) training in compensatory strategies to improve performance on daily tasks for which memory.

A cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for treatment of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) among cancer survivors.

Comparateur actif: Supportive Therapy (ST)

Standard attention control condition therapy for treatment of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) among cancer survivors consisting of 8, 45-minutes visits. ST, emphasizes "non-specific" psychotherapeutic factors of clinician-participant alliance: empathy, support and warmth. ST will be directed at concerns with cancer survivorship and CRCD. Clinicians will set expectations with ST participants that they will be provided validation of experience, support, and encouragement of building their own coping resources if asked directly about what to do about cognitive problems. ST emphasizes reflective listening to help deepen knowledge of the emotional experience of the participant.

Standard attention control condition therapy for treatment of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) among cancer survivors.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
FACT-Cog PCI
Délai: At Baseline, Post-Treatment (8 weeks) and 6-Month Follow-up

The FACT-Cog is a 37-item self-report measure that uses 5- point (0-4) Likert-type ratings that produce four scales: 1) Impact on quality of life; 2) Perceived cognitive impairments; 3) Comments from others; and 3) Perceived cognitive abilities. Higher scores indicate better function and quality of life on each scale. While each scale is scored and interpreted separately, they comprise the total Fact-cog assessment. The FACT-Cog has good evidence of reliability and construct validity. We are assessing change in PCI -- from baseline to post-treatment, to 6-month follow-up-- as our primary measure of outcome.

At Baseline, Post-Treatment (8 weeks) and 6-Month Follow-up

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
California Verbal Learning Test-3 (CVLT-3)
Délai: At Baseline, Post-Treatment (8 weeks) and 6-Month Follow-up

The California Verbal Learning Test is a neuropsychological assessment of episodic verbal and working memory and processing speed. Participants listen to series of words and is then asked to recall the terms and the category to which they belong. This assessment attempts to measure how much a subject learned and also reveal strategies employed and the types of errors made. Higher CVLT-3 scores are associated with better memory and processing function.

At Baseline, Post-Treatment (8 weeks) and 6-Month Follow-up
Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)
Délai: At Baseline, Post-Treatment (8 weeks) and 6-Month Follow-up

The Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), is a neuropsychological measure of verbal fluency. The COWAT consists of three word conditions. Participants are asked to produce as many words as they can that begin with the F, A, or S within a 1 minute time period. The total number of words that the individual is able to produce provides a score. Typically, if someone scores less than 17 words, the test administrator will use additional tests to further evaluate cognition.

At Baseline, Post-Treatment (8 weeks) and 6-Month Follow-up
Digit Span test
Délai: At Baseline, Post-Treatment (8 weeks) and 6-Month Follow-up

The Digit Span test is a neurocognitive subset of both the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Memory Scales (WMS) that assesses working memory. Participants read a sequence of numbers and are asked to repeat the same sequence back to the examiner in order (forward span) or in reverse order (backward span). This assessment generates three "raw" scores and one overall age-appropriate normed (standard) score. Higher scores indicate better working memory and neurocognitive function.

At Baseline, Post-Treatment (8 weeks) and 6-Month Follow-up
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Délai: At Baseline, Post-Treatment (8 weeks) and 6-Month Follow-up

The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a neurocognitive screening instrument used to assess neurological dysfunction. Participants are required to use a coded key to match nine abstract symbols paired with numerical digits. Ten (10) practice items before commencing the test. The final score is the correct number of substitutions in 90 seconds, and scores range between 0 and 110. Higher scores indicate better neurocognitive functioning.

At Baseline, Post-Treatment (8 weeks) and 6-Month Follow-up
functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Délai: At Baseline and Post-Treatment (8 weeks)

fMRI assessment of a working memory task (N-Back) will assess brain activation patterns through detection in bloodflow changes. The fMRI N-Back working memory task has been demonstrated to reflect increased activation in response to MAAT treatment among individuals with traumatic brain injury.

At Baseline and Post-Treatment (8 weeks)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Robert J Ferguson, PhD, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
  • Chercheur principal: Donna Posluszny, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

18 mars 2021

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

31 juillet 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

31 juillet 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

29 septembre 2020

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

7 octobre 2020

Première publication (Réel)

14 octobre 2020

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

29 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

24 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

NIH funded study - public database

Délai de partage IPD

We anticipate a completed data set in approximately December of 2025 and will make de-identified data available to qualified investigators for a period of 3 years after publication of primary results in a peer reviewed journal.

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

De-identified data sharing criteria include (for quality assurance): 1) Qualified researchers who have obtained IRB approval from their institution; 2) Sign a Data Use Agreement (DUA); 3) Agree to NIH, IRB policies and HIPAA requirements regarding privacy, data security and ethical practices; 4) The DUAs will ensure that data will be used only for the specific research purposes outlined in the DUA; 5) No personally identifiable or protected health information will be shared outside of University of Pittsburgh/Indiana University research staff who have a need to know this information for the purposes of the study; 6) Individual participant's data will not be disseminated; 7) Data access will be protected under security measures including encryption and password protection, and that the data will be destroyed or returned to the University of Pittsburgh/Indiana University study team after completion of relevant analyses. Collaborative analyses with project investigators are encouraged.

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner